Exploring Variables Affecting Adolescents’ Reading Literacy and Life Satisfaction: PISA 2018 International Comparison of Korea and Finland

Hyewon Chung, S. Park, Jung-in Kim, Arum Kim
{"title":"Exploring Variables Affecting Adolescents’ Reading Literacy and\n Life Satisfaction: PISA 2018 International Comparison of Korea and\n Finland","authors":"Hyewon Chung, S. Park, Jung-in Kim, Arum Kim","doi":"10.29221/JCE.2021.24.1.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore and compare the variables that explain adolescents’ reading literacy and life satisfaction in Korea and Finland. To do this, the random forest method, machine learning technique, was applied to PISA 2018 data to explore the important variables among student or school related 262 variables, and multilevel modeling was utilized to test the significance of the selected important variables for Korean adolescents(n=6,650) and Finnish adolescents(n=5,649). Main results are as follows. The findings of the random forest revealed that 14 variables were commonly selected as important variables for both Korea and Finland; eight additional variables for Korea only and seven additional variables for Finland only were selected in reading literacy. Similarly, 13 variables were commonly selected for both Korea and Finland, five additional variables for Korea only and seven additional variables for Finland only were selected in life satisfaction. The results of the multilevel modeling revealed that ‘ICT available at home’ and ‘Student behaviour hindering learning’ were statistically negatively related to reading literacy for Korean adolescents. Moreover, ‘Family wealth’, ‘Attitude towards school: learning activities’, ‘Perception of cooperation at school’ and ‘Use of ICT at school in general’ were statistically positively related to Korean adolescents’ life satisfaction while ‘Afraid’ emotion was statistically negatively related to Korean adolescents’ life satisfaction. Based on the findings of the current study, implications for improving Korean adolescents’ literacy and life satisfaction as compared to Finnish adolescents are discussed.","PeriodicalId":198625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29221/JCE.2021.24.1.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore and compare the variables that explain adolescents’ reading literacy and life satisfaction in Korea and Finland. To do this, the random forest method, machine learning technique, was applied to PISA 2018 data to explore the important variables among student or school related 262 variables, and multilevel modeling was utilized to test the significance of the selected important variables for Korean adolescents(n=6,650) and Finnish adolescents(n=5,649). Main results are as follows. The findings of the random forest revealed that 14 variables were commonly selected as important variables for both Korea and Finland; eight additional variables for Korea only and seven additional variables for Finland only were selected in reading literacy. Similarly, 13 variables were commonly selected for both Korea and Finland, five additional variables for Korea only and seven additional variables for Finland only were selected in life satisfaction. The results of the multilevel modeling revealed that ‘ICT available at home’ and ‘Student behaviour hindering learning’ were statistically negatively related to reading literacy for Korean adolescents. Moreover, ‘Family wealth’, ‘Attitude towards school: learning activities’, ‘Perception of cooperation at school’ and ‘Use of ICT at school in general’ were statistically positively related to Korean adolescents’ life satisfaction while ‘Afraid’ emotion was statistically negatively related to Korean adolescents’ life satisfaction. Based on the findings of the current study, implications for improving Korean adolescents’ literacy and life satisfaction as compared to Finnish adolescents are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响青少年阅读素养和生活满意度的变量探讨:PISA 2018韩国与芬兰的国际比较
本研究的目的是探讨和比较韩国和芬兰青少年阅读素养和生活满意度的变量。为此,将随机森林方法和机器学习技术应用于PISA 2018数据,以探索与学生或学校相关的262个变量中的重要变量,并利用多层次建模来测试所选重要变量对韩国青少年(n=6,650)和芬兰青少年(n=5,649)的显著性。主要结果如下:随机森林的结果显示,韩国和芬兰通常选择14个变量作为重要变量;在阅读能力方面,韩国增加了8个变量,芬兰增加了7个变量。同样,在生活满意度方面,韩国和芬兰一般都选择了13个变量,韩国只选择了5个变量,芬兰只选择了7个变量。多层模型的结果显示,“家中可用的信息通信技术”和“学生行为阻碍学习”在统计上与韩国青少年的阅读能力呈负相关。此外,“家庭财富”、“对学校学习活动的态度”、“对学校合作的感知”和“学校一般信息通信技术的使用”与韩国青少年的生活满意度呈统计学上的正相关,而“害怕”情绪与韩国青少年的生活满意度呈统计学上的负相关。基于目前的研究结果,讨论了与芬兰青少年相比,提高韩国青少年的读写能力和生活满意度的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Validation of Teacher's Educational Text readability Evaluation through a Cloze Test for Elementary and Middle School Students Exploration of motor development evidence reflected in the content system of the 2022 revised physical education curriculum and Derivation of future tasks Exploring high school students' formative assessment perception types and influencing factors in Korean language classes Analysis of Trends in Mathematics Achievement of Korean Middle School Students in the Recent 5 Cycles of TIMSS A study on the evaluation of foundational literacy with the case of BC, Canada and Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1