Procedural Forms of Protection of the Right to Entrepreneurship in Administrative Courts: Problems of a Scientific Approach

Vasyl Rіabchenko
{"title":"Procedural Forms of Protection of the Right to Entrepreneurship in Administrative Courts: Problems of a Scientific Approach","authors":"Vasyl Rіabchenko","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.161.274297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topicality is due to the active development of the system of administrative proceedings and at the same time the need to take into account the specifics of the mentioned cases (increased requirements for the promptness of the case review; the accuracy of the definition of individual elements of procedural forms; the need for the administrative court to apply special knowledge in the field of economics). The purpose of the article is to reveal a scientific approach to the development of procedural forms of protection of the right to entrepreneurship in administrative courts, to determine, on the basis of this, the vectors of further development of procedural forms of protection of the specified right. Achieving the outlined goal became possible thanks to the use of a complex of methods of both general scientific and specifically legal nature. Thus, with the use of the formal-dogmatic method, the content of the applied concepts and categories was clarified, including such concepts as \"proceedings\", \"administrative proceedings\", \"procedural form\". The dialectical method made it possible to take into account the general principles of the development of the administrative justice system. On the basis of the combination of this method and the method of synthesis, the current problems of the studied procedural forms are summarized. These and other research methods are applied taking into account the requirements of scientific objectivity. The problem of the ratio of the ratio of the specific procedures for consideration of certain categories of administrative cases and the general forms of legal proceedings is revealed from the standpoint of the dichotomy of the legal nature of the activity of the administrative court (declarative and interventional). Accordingly, the contentiousness of the issue regarding the possibility of calling such specific procedures procedural forms of review and resolution by the administrative court of the considered category of cases was determined. Based on the results of the research, conclusions were formulated and recommendations were made regarding the development of a generalized concept of \"procedural form\", which would combine the common features of general legal proceedings and simplified legal proceedings in this category of cases. This will make it possible to conduct a further study of the specified common features using a single legal construction.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.161.274297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topicality is due to the active development of the system of administrative proceedings and at the same time the need to take into account the specifics of the mentioned cases (increased requirements for the promptness of the case review; the accuracy of the definition of individual elements of procedural forms; the need for the administrative court to apply special knowledge in the field of economics). The purpose of the article is to reveal a scientific approach to the development of procedural forms of protection of the right to entrepreneurship in administrative courts, to determine, on the basis of this, the vectors of further development of procedural forms of protection of the specified right. Achieving the outlined goal became possible thanks to the use of a complex of methods of both general scientific and specifically legal nature. Thus, with the use of the formal-dogmatic method, the content of the applied concepts and categories was clarified, including such concepts as "proceedings", "administrative proceedings", "procedural form". The dialectical method made it possible to take into account the general principles of the development of the administrative justice system. On the basis of the combination of this method and the method of synthesis, the current problems of the studied procedural forms are summarized. These and other research methods are applied taking into account the requirements of scientific objectivity. The problem of the ratio of the ratio of the specific procedures for consideration of certain categories of administrative cases and the general forms of legal proceedings is revealed from the standpoint of the dichotomy of the legal nature of the activity of the administrative court (declarative and interventional). Accordingly, the contentiousness of the issue regarding the possibility of calling such specific procedures procedural forms of review and resolution by the administrative court of the considered category of cases was determined. Based on the results of the research, conclusions were formulated and recommendations were made regarding the development of a generalized concept of "procedural form", which would combine the common features of general legal proceedings and simplified legal proceedings in this category of cases. This will make it possible to conduct a further study of the specified common features using a single legal construction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政法院创业权保护的程序形式:一个科学方法的问题
专题性是由于行政诉讼制度的积极发展,同时需要考虑到所述案件的具体情况(对案件审查的及时性的要求增加;程序形式个别要件界定的准确性;行政法院需要运用经济学领域的专门知识)。本文旨在揭示行政法院创业权保护程序形式发展的科学途径,并在此基础上确定进一步发展创业权保护程序形式的途径。由于使用了具有一般科学性质和具体法律性质的复杂方法,实现概述的目标成为可能。因此,采用形式教条主义的方法,澄清了适用概念和类别的内容,包括“程序”、“行政程序”、“程序形式”等概念。辩证方法使我们有可能考虑到行政司法制度发展的一般原则。在此方法与综合方法相结合的基础上,总结了目前所研究的程序形式存在的问题。这些和其他研究方法的应用考虑到科学客观性的要求。从行政法院活动的法律性质(声明性和干预性)的二分法的观点出发,揭示了审理某些类别行政案件的具体程序与诉讼程序的一般形式的比例问题。因此,关于是否可能将这种具体程序称为行政法院对所审议的一类案件的审查和解决的程序性形式的问题的争议性已经确定。根据研究结果,提出了关于发展“程序形式”这一广义概念的结论和建议,这一概念将把这类案件的一般法律程序的共同特点和简化的法律程序结合起来。这将使使用单一法律结构对指定的共同特征进行进一步研究成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of legal regulation of exemptions in the payment and calculation of land fees in the conditions of martial law on the basis of judicial practice Ways to Protect Infringed Rights in the Creation and Distribution of Deepfakes Creation and Legal Status of a Specially Authorized Body of Non-Banking Financial Services Implementation of the Ecosystem Services Concept in the Environmental Legislation of Ukraine: Current State and Prospects Modern Challenges of Adjusting the Effectiveness of the Application of Laws (on the Example of Tax and Legal Regulation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1