Why Marx Was a Bad Driver: Alienation to Sensuality in the Anthropology of Automobility

A. Dawson
{"title":"Why Marx Was a Bad Driver: Alienation to Sensuality in the Anthropology of Automobility","authors":"A. Dawson","doi":"10.4236/AA.2017.71001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary automobilities research is characterised by a fundamental paradox-recognition of driving as a sensate experience alongside a tendency to emphasise the driver’s sensory disengagement from, rather than engagement with the bodily, social and environmental contexts with which s/he interacts. In this article, which builds on previous empirical work I have published, only now in a more theoretical and comparative directions, I undertake three tasks. I locate automobilities researches’ concern with the senses in its broader contexts of substantive enquiry-namely, the “Mobilities Paradigm” and the social scientific study of the “Senses”. I posit the theoretical basis of the representation of sensory disengagement in driving in automobilities research, specifically in post-war Marxian thought and its critique of Capitalist Modernity and concern with alienation. Lastly, I review three anthropological case studies that represent sensory engagement in driving, one from Palestine, one from Turkey and my own from Bosnia and Herzegovina. I go on to suggest that the approach they share, which is indicative of a growing trend towards the anthropological study of automobilities, is valuable in two ways. It is a corrective to the inappropriate representation of sensory disengagement that is a characteristic of most automobilities research. Also, through its ability to convey sensory engagement in driving, I argue that it provides important insights on the contemporary nature of enduring, but now increasingly mobile social phenomena such as, as in these particular cases sectarian enclosure, class segregation, and ethnic-national transition.","PeriodicalId":149660,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Anthropology","volume":"2005 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/AA.2017.71001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Contemporary automobilities research is characterised by a fundamental paradox-recognition of driving as a sensate experience alongside a tendency to emphasise the driver’s sensory disengagement from, rather than engagement with the bodily, social and environmental contexts with which s/he interacts. In this article, which builds on previous empirical work I have published, only now in a more theoretical and comparative directions, I undertake three tasks. I locate automobilities researches’ concern with the senses in its broader contexts of substantive enquiry-namely, the “Mobilities Paradigm” and the social scientific study of the “Senses”. I posit the theoretical basis of the representation of sensory disengagement in driving in automobilities research, specifically in post-war Marxian thought and its critique of Capitalist Modernity and concern with alienation. Lastly, I review three anthropological case studies that represent sensory engagement in driving, one from Palestine, one from Turkey and my own from Bosnia and Herzegovina. I go on to suggest that the approach they share, which is indicative of a growing trend towards the anthropological study of automobilities, is valuable in two ways. It is a corrective to the inappropriate representation of sensory disengagement that is a characteristic of most automobilities research. Also, through its ability to convey sensory engagement in driving, I argue that it provides important insights on the contemporary nature of enduring, but now increasingly mobile social phenomena such as, as in these particular cases sectarian enclosure, class segregation, and ethnic-national transition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么马克思是个糟糕的司机:汽车人类学中对感官的异化
当代汽车研究的特点是一个基本的悖论——承认驾驶是一种感官体验,同时又倾向于强调驾驶员的感官脱离,而不是与他/她互动的身体、社会和环境环境的接触。在这篇建立在我之前发表的实证工作基础上的文章中,我承担了三个任务,只是现在在一个更理论化和比较的方向上。我将汽车研究对感官的关注置于其更广泛的实质性探究背景中——即“移动范式”和对“感官”的社会科学研究。我假定在汽车研究中,特别是在战后马克思主义思想及其对资本主义现代性的批判和对异化的关注中,感官脱离在驾驶中的表现的理论基础。最后,我回顾了三个代表驾驶感官参与的人类学案例研究,一个来自巴勒斯坦,一个来自土耳其,我自己来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那。我接着提出,他们所分享的方法表明了对汽车进行人类学研究的一种日益增长的趋势,这种方法在两个方面是有价值的。这是对大多数汽车研究的特征——感官脱离的不恰当表述的一种纠正。此外,通过它在驾驶过程中传达感官参与的能力,我认为它为持久的、但现在日益流动的社会现象的当代本质提供了重要的见解,例如,在这些特殊情况下,宗派封闭、阶级隔离和种族-国家过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cooperative and Problem-Based Learning Practice in Islamic Education in Bahrain: Strengths and Challenges The Engraved Pebble from Pavlo-Ochakovskaya Spit Critics of Delegation and Decentralization in Abdicating Authority and Upholding Ubuntu Philosophy in Social Welfare Organizations Archaeology of Human Consciousness: An Integrated Narrative of Cognitive Evolution from the Preanthromorphic Mind to Humanity’s Contemporary, Academia-Centric Culture Ayotzinapa 43: The Political Aesthetics of Drone Protest Graffiti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1