Contract selection of platform selling under spillovers from offline to online sales

Xueping Zhen, Shuangshuang Xu, Conglin Hu
{"title":"Contract selection of platform selling under spillovers from offline to online sales","authors":"Xueping Zhen, Shuangshuang Xu, Conglin Hu","doi":"10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More and more retailers have established their own online channels (such as Apps, WeChat applets and official websites) in addition to their offline channels (physical stores). Moreover, some of them also try to sell their products through the third-party platforms (e-tailer platforms such as Amazon, Taobao and JD). Two common agency fee contracts are offered by the third-party platform to the retailer: the revenue sharing contract where the platform shares a portion of the retailer's revenue, and the fixed fee contract where the retailer needs to pay a fixed rent for each sale. This paper establishes a model where a retailer sells products through an offline channel, an online channel and a third-party platform channel which provides two different agency contracts. A spillover effect is considered to capture the interaction between the offline channel and the online channel. We investigate the optimal pricing decisions of the retailer and contract preference of both the retailer and the third-party platform. We find that the retailer prefers revenue sharing contract to the fixed fee contract. However, when the degree of competition among channels is very low, the third-party platform is not willing to offer revenue sharing contract. Moreover, we find that the third-party platform prefers the fixed fee contract when both contracts generate profits.","PeriodicalId":442421,"journal":{"name":"2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

More and more retailers have established their own online channels (such as Apps, WeChat applets and official websites) in addition to their offline channels (physical stores). Moreover, some of them also try to sell their products through the third-party platforms (e-tailer platforms such as Amazon, Taobao and JD). Two common agency fee contracts are offered by the third-party platform to the retailer: the revenue sharing contract where the platform shares a portion of the retailer's revenue, and the fixed fee contract where the retailer needs to pay a fixed rent for each sale. This paper establishes a model where a retailer sells products through an offline channel, an online channel and a third-party platform channel which provides two different agency contracts. A spillover effect is considered to capture the interaction between the offline channel and the online channel. We investigate the optimal pricing decisions of the retailer and contract preference of both the retailer and the third-party platform. We find that the retailer prefers revenue sharing contract to the fixed fee contract. However, when the degree of competition among channels is very low, the third-party platform is not willing to offer revenue sharing contract. Moreover, we find that the third-party platform prefers the fixed fee contract when both contracts generate profits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
线下销售向线上销售溢出效应下的平台销售合同选择
越来越多的零售商除了线下渠道(实体店)之外,还建立了自己的线上渠道(如app、微信小程序和官方网站)。此外,他们中的一些人还试图通过第三方平台(亚马逊、淘宝和京东等电子零售商平台)销售他们的产品。第三方平台向零售商提供两种常见的代理费合同:一种是收入分成合同,平台分享零售商的部分收入;另一种是固定费用合同,零售商需要为每笔销售支付固定租金。本文建立了零售商通过线下渠道、线上渠道和第三方平台渠道销售产品的模型,这三种渠道提供了两种不同的代理合同。溢出效应被认为是捕捉离线渠道和在线渠道之间的相互作用。我们研究了零售商的最优定价决策以及零售商和第三方平台的契约偏好。我们发现零售商更倾向于收益分成合同而不是固定费用合同。然而,当渠道之间的竞争程度很低时,第三方平台不愿意提供收入分成合同。此外,我们发现当两种合同都产生利润时,第三方平台更倾向于固定费用合同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on the Influence Mechanism of Gamification Elements on Users' Willingness to Continue Using in Interest-based Virtual Communities ‐‐ Based on ECM-ISC Model The Application of Offshore Operation Risk Classification Management Method An empirical study of corporate environmental liability performance, industry characteristics and financial performance The Application of Safety&security System in the Long Distance Landing Subsea Pipeline A Clustering-based Approach for Reorganizing Bus Route on Bus Rapid Transit System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1