The Stolen Child: Maternal Claim and National Belonging in David Bergen's Stranger

Janice Schroeder
{"title":"The Stolen Child: Maternal Claim and National Belonging in David Bergen's Stranger","authors":"Janice Schroeder","doi":"10.1353/ado.2022.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Contemporary fictions about adoption play an important role in testing and normalizing cultural beliefs about whom adoption serves. Some examples of contemporary adoption fiction seem to offer a political critique of a failed system of international adoption where adoption is understood as a tool of imperial domination. But they may also reduce the complexities of adoption to a \"good vs. evil\" plotline that pits adults against each other in a struggle for the possession and ownership of another human being. This article's case study is the 2016 novel Stranger by Canadian novelist David Bergen. By granting moral and maternal power to the birth mother, and bringing the stolen adoptee \"home,\" Stranger foregrounds birth mother agency against a backdrop of asymmetrical relations between Guatemala and the US. In this sense, Stranger is a welcome addition to contemporary adoption novels, which often occlude the first parents. Yet Bergen also harnesses the idea of the child as property of the patriarchal family, framing his adoption plot in the stark moral logic of Dickensian fiction, orphan fairytales, and biblical narratives of good and evil. While Stranger offers an anti-imperialist fantasy of the adoptee's return, and a feminist-leaning celebration of the birth mother, it does so on a bedrock of stories in which women compete for male attention, maternal status, and ownership of children.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"62 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2022.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Contemporary fictions about adoption play an important role in testing and normalizing cultural beliefs about whom adoption serves. Some examples of contemporary adoption fiction seem to offer a political critique of a failed system of international adoption where adoption is understood as a tool of imperial domination. But they may also reduce the complexities of adoption to a "good vs. evil" plotline that pits adults against each other in a struggle for the possession and ownership of another human being. This article's case study is the 2016 novel Stranger by Canadian novelist David Bergen. By granting moral and maternal power to the birth mother, and bringing the stolen adoptee "home," Stranger foregrounds birth mother agency against a backdrop of asymmetrical relations between Guatemala and the US. In this sense, Stranger is a welcome addition to contemporary adoption novels, which often occlude the first parents. Yet Bergen also harnesses the idea of the child as property of the patriarchal family, framing his adoption plot in the stark moral logic of Dickensian fiction, orphan fairytales, and biblical narratives of good and evil. While Stranger offers an anti-imperialist fantasy of the adoptee's return, and a feminist-leaning celebration of the birth mother, it does so on a bedrock of stories in which women compete for male attention, maternal status, and ownership of children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被偷走的孩子:大卫·卑尔根的《陌生人》中的母亲要求与国家归属
摘要:当代收养小说在检验和规范收养服务对象的文化观念方面发挥着重要作用。当代收养小说的一些例子似乎提供了对失败的国际收养制度的政治批判,在这种制度下,收养被理解为帝国统治的工具。但它们也可能将收养的复杂性简化为“善与恶”的情节主线,让成年人在争夺另一个人的所有权和所有权的斗争中相互对抗。本文的案例研究是加拿大小说家大卫·卑尔根2016年的小说《陌生人》。通过赋予生母道德和母性力量,并将被偷的被收养者“带回家”,《陌生人》将生母机构置于危地马拉和美国之间不对称关系的背景下。从这个意义上说,《陌生人》是当代收养小说的一个受欢迎的补充,这些小说往往会把第一个父母拒之门外。然而,卑尔根也利用了孩子是父权家庭财产的观念,在狄更斯小说、孤儿童话和圣经善恶叙事的鲜明道德逻辑中构建了他的收养情节。虽然《陌生人》提供了一个关于被收养者回归的反帝国主义幻想,以及对生母的女权主义倾向的庆祝,但它是建立在女性争夺男性关注、母亲地位和孩子所有权的故事基础上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Dobbs Issue Taking Children: A History of American Terror by Laura Briggs, and: Legitimating Life: Adoption in the Age of Globalization and Biotechnology by Sonja van Wichelen (review) Originalism: Erasing Women from the Body Politic Separation, Sorrow, and Silence: What Birth Mothers and Birth Searching in Children’s Literature Can Teach Us About the Abortion v. Adoption Debate The Dobbs Decision and the (False) Adoption “Option,” A Personal Essay of “Ambiguous Loss”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1