Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fungsi Pembangkit

Ninik Mutianingsih, Lydia Lia Prayitno, Agus Prasetyo Kurniawan
{"title":"Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fungsi Pembangkit","authors":"Ninik Mutianingsih, Lydia Lia Prayitno, Agus Prasetyo Kurniawan","doi":"10.15642/jrpm.2018.3.1.29-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe students’ thinking process in solving the problems of generating function. This is a case study that classifies students into three categories: high, medium, and low. Subjects were asked to solve the problems then use think aloud to reveal their thinking process. The results show that in understanding the problem, using conceptual and procedural knowledge related to the problems, strategies, and experiences they have in solving similar problems between the three subjects is different. Subjects with high and medium capability are able to reveal the problem-solving component of Polya in detail, whereas low-ability subjects use only some of the problem-solving components of Polya.","PeriodicalId":210114,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2018.3.1.29-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe students’ thinking process in solving the problems of generating function. This is a case study that classifies students into three categories: high, medium, and low. Subjects were asked to solve the problems then use think aloud to reveal their thinking process. The results show that in understanding the problem, using conceptual and procedural knowledge related to the problems, strategies, and experiences they have in solving similar problems between the three subjects is different. Subjects with high and medium capability are able to reveal the problem-solving component of Polya in detail, whereas low-ability subjects use only some of the problem-solving components of Polya.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生思考解决植物功能问题的过程
本研究旨在描述学生在解决生成函数问题时的思维过程。这是一个案例研究,将学生分为三类:高、中、低。研究对象被要求解决问题,然后用“大声思考”来揭示他们的思考过程。结果表明,在理解问题时,使用与问题相关的概念性和程序性知识、解决类似问题的策略和经验在三个被试之间存在差异。高、中等能力的被试能够详细地揭示Polya的问题解决成分,而低能力的被试只能使用Polya的部分问题解决成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Etnomatematika: Eksplorasi Budaya Sasak sebagai Sumber Belajar Matematika Sekolah Dasar Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Open-Ended Deskripsi Proses Kognitif Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Modes Of Representation Teori Bruner Analisis Kesalahan Penyelesaian Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson Kemampuan Metakognitif dan Komunikasi Matematis dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1