Defining Approaches To The Classification Of Criminal Procedure Policies Of EU Member States

Y. Mykytyn
{"title":"Defining Approaches To The Classification Of Criminal Procedure Policies Of EU Member States","authors":"Y. Mykytyn","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.51.166-177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the approaches to the classification of criminal procedural policiesof EU Member States. The basic variants of classifications of models (types) of criminal procedure policies of the EU Member States are investigated. \nIt is considered that in the context of defining approaches to the classification of criminal procedural policies of the Member States of the European Union, it would be optimal to simultaneously use the terms «model» and «type» of criminal procedural policy as universal synonymous categories, that reflecting both European and Ukrainian legal traditions. \nDespite the tendency to unification and converge criminal procedural legislation of EU Member States on the basis of EU standards, criminal procedural policies in such countries have significant differences. \nBelonging to a particular model (type) of criminal procedure policy is determined on the basis of the content of the legal system of a particular EU Member State and is conditioned by various factors. \nFirst of all, there are two basic models (types) of criminal procedural policies of EU Member States at the global level: Anglo-Saxon and Continental (Romano-German). The Continental (Romano-German) model (type) of criminal procedure policy has the following types: French (Romance), German and Swedish (Scandinavian). \nThe German type (model) had the greatest influence on the formulation of criminal (type), the following subspecies are distinguished: Central and Eastern European, Baltic, Balkan. \nThe models (types) of criminal procedure policies of EU Member States can be classified on the basis of such a criterion as the form of the state. Thus, the form of state government can distinguish the constitutional monarchical model (type) of criminal procedural policy and the republican model (type) of criminal procedural policy. In turn, the republican model (type) of criminal procedural policy is of two types, semi-presidential and parliamentary. It should be emphasized that the EU Member States are not characterized by the presidential kind of the model (type) of republican criminal procedural policy. According to the form of the state system there are a unitary and a federal model (type) of criminal procedure policy. According to the form of state regime, all EU Member States belong to the democratic model (type) of criminal procedure policy. \nOne of the criteria for the classification of models (types) of criminal procedural policies is the methodology of codification of criminal procedural law. According to this criterion, it is possible to distinguish classical continental, Swedish (Scandinavian) and Anglo-Saxon model (type) of criminal procedure policy.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.51.166-177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the approaches to the classification of criminal procedural policiesof EU Member States. The basic variants of classifications of models (types) of criminal procedure policies of the EU Member States are investigated. It is considered that in the context of defining approaches to the classification of criminal procedural policies of the Member States of the European Union, it would be optimal to simultaneously use the terms «model» and «type» of criminal procedural policy as universal synonymous categories, that reflecting both European and Ukrainian legal traditions. Despite the tendency to unification and converge criminal procedural legislation of EU Member States on the basis of EU standards, criminal procedural policies in such countries have significant differences. Belonging to a particular model (type) of criminal procedure policy is determined on the basis of the content of the legal system of a particular EU Member State and is conditioned by various factors. First of all, there are two basic models (types) of criminal procedural policies of EU Member States at the global level: Anglo-Saxon and Continental (Romano-German). The Continental (Romano-German) model (type) of criminal procedure policy has the following types: French (Romance), German and Swedish (Scandinavian). The German type (model) had the greatest influence on the formulation of criminal (type), the following subspecies are distinguished: Central and Eastern European, Baltic, Balkan. The models (types) of criminal procedure policies of EU Member States can be classified on the basis of such a criterion as the form of the state. Thus, the form of state government can distinguish the constitutional monarchical model (type) of criminal procedural policy and the republican model (type) of criminal procedural policy. In turn, the republican model (type) of criminal procedural policy is of two types, semi-presidential and parliamentary. It should be emphasized that the EU Member States are not characterized by the presidential kind of the model (type) of republican criminal procedural policy. According to the form of the state system there are a unitary and a federal model (type) of criminal procedure policy. According to the form of state regime, all EU Member States belong to the democratic model (type) of criminal procedure policy. One of the criteria for the classification of models (types) of criminal procedural policies is the methodology of codification of criminal procedural law. According to this criterion, it is possible to distinguish classical continental, Swedish (Scandinavian) and Anglo-Saxon model (type) of criminal procedure policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟成员国刑事诉讼政策分类的界定方法
本文分析了欧盟成员国刑事诉讼政策分类的途径。考察了欧盟成员国刑事诉讼政策模式(类型)分类的基本变体。据认为,在确定欧洲联盟成员国刑事程序政策分类方法的范围内,最好同时使用刑事程序政策的“模式”和“类型”这两个术语作为反映欧洲和乌克兰法律传统的普遍同义类别。尽管欧盟成员国的刑事诉讼立法在欧盟标准的基础上有统一和趋同的趋势,但各国的刑事诉讼政策却存在显著差异。属于某一特定模式(类型)的刑事诉讼政策是根据某一欧盟成员国法律制度的内容而确定的,并受到各种因素的制约。首先,欧盟成员国在全球层面的刑事诉讼政策有两种基本模式(类型):盎格鲁-撒克逊模式和欧陆(罗马-德国)模式。欧陆(罗马-德国)模式的刑事诉讼政策有以下几种类型:法国(罗曼语)、德国和瑞典(斯堪的纳维亚语)。德国类型(模式)对罪犯(类型)的形成影响最大,以下亚种被区分:中欧和东欧,波罗的海,巴尔干。欧盟成员国刑事诉讼政策的模式(类型)可以根据国家形式这一标准进行分类。因此,国家政府的形式可以区分君主立宪制的刑事诉讼政策模式(类型)和共和制的刑事诉讼政策模式(类型)。相应地,刑事诉讼政策的共和模式(类型)又分为半总统制模式和议会制模式两种。需要强调的是,欧盟成员国并不具有总统式的共和式刑事诉讼政策模式(类型)。根据国家制度的形式,刑事诉讼政策有单一型和联邦型之分。从国家制度的形式来看,欧盟各成员国均属于民主刑事诉讼政策模式(类型)。刑事诉讼政策模式(类型)分类的标准之一是刑事诉讼法的法典化方法。根据这一标准,可以区分古典大陆、瑞典(斯堪的纳维亚)和盎格鲁-撒克逊模式(类型)的刑事诉讼政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidential activity of the court in civil and administrative proceedings: a comparative legal analysis The influence of jurisprudence of international treaty bodies on the interpretation of international treaties Administrative and legal mechanisms for ensuring the safety of the educational process in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine Simplified proceedings in the civil procedure of Poland Consideration of family cases by the court according to the rules of simplified litigation: a review of judicial practice and trends of change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1