Why Should We Assure Quality Teaching?

John Sekar Jeyaraj
{"title":"Why Should We Assure Quality Teaching?","authors":"John Sekar Jeyaraj","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3486742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education is essential for India’s long-term social progress, economic growth, and sustainable development. To realize this purpose, stakeholders of universities and colleges need academic freedom and institutional autonomy. They should be innovative institutions that offer a huge range of opportunities for students to grow as wholesome personalities. There are two issues: providing access to higher education to the needy and the deserving, if not for all, and maintaining its quality. The former without the latter is a useless proposition. In fact, the quality is more essential than the quantity even though it cannot be attained overtime and quantified in tangible terms. Both ought to proceed simultaneously. The onerous responsibility lays on the part of the most important stakeholder from the delivery point of view — the teachers. Paradoxically, the learners also deserve equal attention because teachers without learners mean nothing as much as teaching without learning is an exercise in futility. The role of teachers in quality initiatives ranges from curriculum planning to curriculum implementation. It encompasses being sensitive to learner needs, articulating specific outcomes of learning for each course that is contemplated, unitizing the course content, providing access to the updated sources of knowledge, involving in materials production, devising teaching methods and techniques, involving learners in the process of interactive teaching-learning, trying out innovative testing techniques, harvesting ICT to suit the learning styles of the 21st tech-savvy learners, and creating academic and intellectual spaces for research.","PeriodicalId":188711,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Educational Policy (Topic)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Educational Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher education is essential for India’s long-term social progress, economic growth, and sustainable development. To realize this purpose, stakeholders of universities and colleges need academic freedom and institutional autonomy. They should be innovative institutions that offer a huge range of opportunities for students to grow as wholesome personalities. There are two issues: providing access to higher education to the needy and the deserving, if not for all, and maintaining its quality. The former without the latter is a useless proposition. In fact, the quality is more essential than the quantity even though it cannot be attained overtime and quantified in tangible terms. Both ought to proceed simultaneously. The onerous responsibility lays on the part of the most important stakeholder from the delivery point of view — the teachers. Paradoxically, the learners also deserve equal attention because teachers without learners mean nothing as much as teaching without learning is an exercise in futility. The role of teachers in quality initiatives ranges from curriculum planning to curriculum implementation. It encompasses being sensitive to learner needs, articulating specific outcomes of learning for each course that is contemplated, unitizing the course content, providing access to the updated sources of knowledge, involving in materials production, devising teaching methods and techniques, involving learners in the process of interactive teaching-learning, trying out innovative testing techniques, harvesting ICT to suit the learning styles of the 21st tech-savvy learners, and creating academic and intellectual spaces for research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么要保证教学质量?
高等教育对印度的长期社会进步、经济增长和可持续发展至关重要。要实现这一目标,高校利益相关者需要学术自由和机构自治。它们应该是创新的机构,为学生提供广泛的机会,让他们成长为健全的人格。有两个问题:为有需要和值得接受高等教育的人提供接受高等教育的机会,如果不是为所有人提供的话,以及保持高等教育的质量。没有后者的前者是一个无用的命题。事实上,质量比数量更重要,即使它不能长期获得并以有形的形式量化。两者应该同时进行。从交付的角度来看,繁重的责任落在了最重要的利益相关者身上——教师。矛盾的是,学习者也应该得到同样的关注,因为没有学习者的教师没有任何意义,就像没有学习的教学是徒劳的练习一样。教师在质量倡议中的作用从课程规划到课程实施。它包括对学习者需求的敏感,阐明所考虑的每门课程的具体学习结果,统一课程内容,提供获取最新知识来源的途径,参与材料制作,设计教学方法和技术,让学习者参与互动教与学的过程,尝试创新的测试技术,收获ICT以适应21世纪精通技术的学习者的学习风格,为研究创造学术和智力空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Free School Meals and Demand for Community Food Resources Experimental Evidence on Which Academic Outcomes Nudging Can Shift for First-Year College Students from High-FRL Schools Performance Grading, Innovation and SDG 4 Relationships Comparative Study of Education Funding in Nigeria School Governance Structure and Its Impact on Student Performance: A Comparative Study between Four Provinces of China and the PISA2015 High-Scored Countries/Economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1