E. Kostenko, Lyudmila V. Petrova, D. I. Nahrapov, I. Pogonchenkova
{"title":"Effect of Rehabilitation Interventions on Post-Stroke Upper Limb Dysfunction and Cognitive Functions: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"E. Kostenko, Lyudmila V. Petrova, D. I. Nahrapov, I. Pogonchenkova","doi":"10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-1-69-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. The prevalence of upper limb dysfunction and cognitive impairments are frequently observed following stroke, but are often considered as distinct entities, and there is little evidence regarding how they are related, as well as rehabilitation methods are aimed at monodomain restoration of any of these impairments.\nAIM. To analyze the data of recent years on the impact of rehabilitation interventions on cognitive and the upper limb (UL) motor functions in patients with stroke, and to establish how they are related.\nMATERIAL AND METHODS. The search was carried out in the Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus sources in accordance with the PRISMA principles and initially revealed 2,841 records. Of these, 35 articles were included in the study with publication 2011–2022. Keywords were used: stroke, movement, motor, upper limb, cognition, cognitive, cognitive-motor, motor-cognitive function. The relationship between cognitive impairments and the degree of restoration of the UL motor function under the influence of various rehabilitation interventions was assessed.\nRESULTS. Five studies were selected for meta-analysis with the inclusion of 180 stroke patients. It is shown that the improvement of cognitive tests (MoCA) is accompanied by an improvement in UL motor impairments (FMA, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test), while hand dexterity (Box and blocks, NHPT, Minnesota manual dexterity test) remained without statistically significant changes during medical rehabilitation.\nCONCLUSION. The meta-analysis provides evidence of the relationship and mutual influence of cognitive functions on motor recovery and manual dexterity. However, the small sample size and heterogeneity of available studies are still limiting factors for obtaining unambiguous conclusions.","PeriodicalId":397121,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-1-69-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The prevalence of upper limb dysfunction and cognitive impairments are frequently observed following stroke, but are often considered as distinct entities, and there is little evidence regarding how they are related, as well as rehabilitation methods are aimed at monodomain restoration of any of these impairments.
AIM. To analyze the data of recent years on the impact of rehabilitation interventions on cognitive and the upper limb (UL) motor functions in patients with stroke, and to establish how they are related.
MATERIAL AND METHODS. The search was carried out in the Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus sources in accordance with the PRISMA principles and initially revealed 2,841 records. Of these, 35 articles were included in the study with publication 2011–2022. Keywords were used: stroke, movement, motor, upper limb, cognition, cognitive, cognitive-motor, motor-cognitive function. The relationship between cognitive impairments and the degree of restoration of the UL motor function under the influence of various rehabilitation interventions was assessed.
RESULTS. Five studies were selected for meta-analysis with the inclusion of 180 stroke patients. It is shown that the improvement of cognitive tests (MoCA) is accompanied by an improvement in UL motor impairments (FMA, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test), while hand dexterity (Box and blocks, NHPT, Minnesota manual dexterity test) remained without statistically significant changes during medical rehabilitation.
CONCLUSION. The meta-analysis provides evidence of the relationship and mutual influence of cognitive functions on motor recovery and manual dexterity. However, the small sample size and heterogeneity of available studies are still limiting factors for obtaining unambiguous conclusions.
介绍。中风后经常观察到上肢功能障碍和认知障碍的患病率,但通常被认为是不同的实体,很少有证据表明它们是如何相关的,以及康复方法旨在恢复这些损伤中的任何一种。分析近年来康复干预对脑卒中患者认知和上肢运动功能的影响,并探讨两者之间的关系。材料和方法。根据PRISMA原则,在Medline、Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus来源中进行了搜索,初步发现了2841条记录。其中,35篇文章被纳入2011-2022年出版的研究。关键词:卒中,运动,运动,上肢,认知,认知,认知-运动,运动-认知功能。在各种康复干预措施的影响下,评估认知障碍与UL运动功能恢复程度的关系。选取5项研究纳入180例脑卒中患者进行meta分析。结果表明,认知测试(MoCA)的改善伴随着UL运动障碍(FMA, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test)的改善,而手灵巧(Box and blocks, NHPT, Minnesota manual dexterity Test)在医疗康复期间无统计学意义的变化。meta分析提供了认知功能对运动恢复和手灵巧的关系和相互影响的证据。然而,现有研究的小样本量和异质性仍然是获得明确结论的限制因素。