Effect of Rehabilitation Interventions on Post-Stroke Upper Limb Dysfunction and Cognitive Functions: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

E. Kostenko, Lyudmila V. Petrova, D. I. Nahrapov, I. Pogonchenkova
{"title":"Effect of Rehabilitation Interventions on Post-Stroke Upper Limb Dysfunction and Cognitive Functions: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"E. Kostenko, Lyudmila V. Petrova, D. I. Nahrapov, I. Pogonchenkova","doi":"10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-1-69-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. The prevalence of upper limb dysfunction and cognitive impairments are frequently observed following stroke, but are often considered as distinct entities, and there is little evidence regarding how they are related, as well as rehabilitation methods are aimed at monodomain restoration of any of these impairments.\nAIM. To analyze the data of recent years on the impact of rehabilitation interventions on cognitive and the upper limb (UL) motor functions in patients with stroke, and to establish how they are related.\nMATERIAL AND METHODS. The search was carried out in the Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus sources in accordance with the PRISMA principles and initially revealed 2,841 records. Of these, 35 articles were included in the study with publication 2011–2022. Keywords were used: stroke, movement, motor, upper limb, cognition, cognitive, cognitive-motor, motor-cognitive function. The relationship between cognitive impairments and the degree of restoration of the UL motor function under the influence of various rehabilitation interventions was assessed.\nRESULTS. Five studies were selected for meta-analysis with the inclusion of 180 stroke patients. It is shown that the improvement of cognitive tests (MoCA) is accompanied by an improvement in UL motor impairments (FMA, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test), while hand dexterity (Box and blocks, NHPT, Minnesota manual dexterity test) remained without statistically significant changes during medical rehabilitation.\nCONCLUSION. The meta-analysis provides evidence of the relationship and mutual influence of cognitive functions on motor recovery and manual dexterity. However, the small sample size and heterogeneity of available studies are still limiting factors for obtaining unambiguous conclusions.","PeriodicalId":397121,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2023-22-1-69-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The prevalence of upper limb dysfunction and cognitive impairments are frequently observed following stroke, but are often considered as distinct entities, and there is little evidence regarding how they are related, as well as rehabilitation methods are aimed at monodomain restoration of any of these impairments. AIM. To analyze the data of recent years on the impact of rehabilitation interventions on cognitive and the upper limb (UL) motor functions in patients with stroke, and to establish how they are related. MATERIAL AND METHODS. The search was carried out in the Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus sources in accordance with the PRISMA principles and initially revealed 2,841 records. Of these, 35 articles were included in the study with publication 2011–2022. Keywords were used: stroke, movement, motor, upper limb, cognition, cognitive, cognitive-motor, motor-cognitive function. The relationship between cognitive impairments and the degree of restoration of the UL motor function under the influence of various rehabilitation interventions was assessed. RESULTS. Five studies were selected for meta-analysis with the inclusion of 180 stroke patients. It is shown that the improvement of cognitive tests (MoCA) is accompanied by an improvement in UL motor impairments (FMA, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test), while hand dexterity (Box and blocks, NHPT, Minnesota manual dexterity test) remained without statistically significant changes during medical rehabilitation. CONCLUSION. The meta-analysis provides evidence of the relationship and mutual influence of cognitive functions on motor recovery and manual dexterity. However, the small sample size and heterogeneity of available studies are still limiting factors for obtaining unambiguous conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复干预对脑卒中后上肢功能障碍和认知功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
介绍。中风后经常观察到上肢功能障碍和认知障碍的患病率,但通常被认为是不同的实体,很少有证据表明它们是如何相关的,以及康复方法旨在恢复这些损伤中的任何一种。分析近年来康复干预对脑卒中患者认知和上肢运动功能的影响,并探讨两者之间的关系。材料和方法。根据PRISMA原则,在Medline、Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus来源中进行了搜索,初步发现了2841条记录。其中,35篇文章被纳入2011-2022年出版的研究。关键词:卒中,运动,运动,上肢,认知,认知,认知-运动,运动-认知功能。在各种康复干预措施的影响下,评估认知障碍与UL运动功能恢复程度的关系。选取5项研究纳入180例脑卒中患者进行meta分析。结果表明,认知测试(MoCA)的改善伴随着UL运动障碍(FMA, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test)的改善,而手灵巧(Box and blocks, NHPT, Minnesota manual dexterity Test)在医疗康复期间无统计学意义的变化。meta分析提供了认知功能对运动恢复和手灵巧的关系和相互影响的证据。然而,现有研究的小样本量和异质性仍然是获得明确结论的限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medical rehabilitation after lower limb injuries in patients with diabetes mellitus: a review Enhancing sleep quality in non-alcoholic fatty liver with combined accelerated aerobic training: a randomized control study Rationale of using magnetically sensitive biomaterials in bone tissue therapy: a review Features of sensorimotor response of students with different types of attitude to the disease: a cross-sectional study Non-invasive laser therapy effect on lipid profile and renal function in metabolic syndrome: randomized control trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1