The Emergence of Jesus Rock: On Taming the "African Beat"

J. Haines
{"title":"The Emergence of Jesus Rock: On Taming the \"African Beat\"","authors":"J. Haines","doi":"10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.31.2.0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes --I John 1:1 On March 4, 1966, the London Evening Standard published John Lennon's now infamous words: \"Christianity will go.... We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first--rock \"n\" roll or Christianity\" (P. Norman 2003, 268). Some five months later, when the last part of this citation was printed on the cover of the popular American teen magazine Datebook capped off with an exclamation point--\"one of the most influential marks of punctuation ever fixed in print\" (quoted in \"Rock 'n' roll according to John\" 1966, 50) according to Devin McKinney--all hell-fire broke loose, in the words of Time magazine (2003, 141). Two days after Lennon's \"rock 'n' roll or Christianity!\" threat hit newsstands on July 29, public burnings of Beatles records were held in Birmingham, Alabama. Soon anti-Beatle frenzy had spread from the South to the rest of the United States. By September of 1966, Americans from New York City to Reno were burning and banning Beatles' records; John Lennon feared for his life as manager Brian Epstein tried to \"quell the storm over the remark on Jesus,\" as one newspaper put it; \"Are the Beatles Safe in America?\" wondered the New Musical Express; \"Is Beatlemania Dead?\" asked Time (\"Beatles Manager ...\" 1966, 13; Spitz 2005, 627-628, 924). So what had happened? Only two years before, Beatlemania had swept the United States with the overnight success of the Fab Four on the Ed Sullivan Show; the following year saw the release of both films A Hard Day's Night and Help! and their critically acclaimed Rubber Soul, an album that took Beatles music to a new level of maturity. Had America suddenly grown tired of the Beatles? Was Beatlemania threatening to supplant American Christianity? Some might have thought so. A year before the storm broke, one parent worried that his daughter and her friends had developed \"a real cult over the Beatles,\" complete with \"Beatle prayers\" uttered before a \"Beatle altar\" in one girl's bedroom (McKinney 2003, 142-143). In reality, the wind stirring up the 1966 \"storm in a teacup\" (Spitz 2005, 627) was not John Lennon, nor even Beatlemania, but rock 'n' roll itself. As detailed in this essay, many in the United States viewed rock as plagued with two principal problems: its African roots and its stimulation to dance. These two problems were related, since rock's presumed Africanness gave it dangerous rhythm. The racist denunciation of rock was not unique to the sixties; it went back a decade to rock's earliest moments, as Shane Maddock has shown (1996, 181-202). In 1956, for example, the White Citizens Council of Alabama denounced rock's sexual overtones, accusing the \"basic, heavybeat music of the Negroes\" of seducing unsuspecting white youth. Racist antagonism against rock only increased with the battle for civil rights and the \"blanching of rock,\" as David Szatmary has called it (2000, 21-25; see also Romanowski 1996, 211-212). Racist prejudices in American popular music were nothing new, of course. In the 1910s, for example, jazz was called the musical \"virus\" of \"colored ... groups that play for dancing ... they shake and jump and writhe in ways to suggest a return to the medieval jumping mania\" (Osgood 1926, 11). The 1966 Beatles vs. Christianity debacle proved to be a watershed moment in the history of rock 'n' roll, since it brought out antirock racial prejudices as never before. As detailed in this essay, the scandal over the Beatles generated an unprecedented campaign of antirock propaganda that focused on the presumed African aspects of rock. This campaign was shortly followed by the emergence of Jesus Rock. From the late sixties to the late seventies, the expression Jesus Rock became the first Christian incarnation of rock, taming its black and dance elements. The Christian Contemporary Music phase completed this process. What Jesus Rock really changed was less rock music itself than its dressing; namely, the lifestyle and lyrics of rock performers. …","PeriodicalId":354930,"journal":{"name":"Black Music Research Journal","volume":"97 3-4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Music Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.31.2.0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

What we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes --I John 1:1 On March 4, 1966, the London Evening Standard published John Lennon's now infamous words: "Christianity will go.... We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first--rock "n" roll or Christianity" (P. Norman 2003, 268). Some five months later, when the last part of this citation was printed on the cover of the popular American teen magazine Datebook capped off with an exclamation point--"one of the most influential marks of punctuation ever fixed in print" (quoted in "Rock 'n' roll according to John" 1966, 50) according to Devin McKinney--all hell-fire broke loose, in the words of Time magazine (2003, 141). Two days after Lennon's "rock 'n' roll or Christianity!" threat hit newsstands on July 29, public burnings of Beatles records were held in Birmingham, Alabama. Soon anti-Beatle frenzy had spread from the South to the rest of the United States. By September of 1966, Americans from New York City to Reno were burning and banning Beatles' records; John Lennon feared for his life as manager Brian Epstein tried to "quell the storm over the remark on Jesus," as one newspaper put it; "Are the Beatles Safe in America?" wondered the New Musical Express; "Is Beatlemania Dead?" asked Time ("Beatles Manager ..." 1966, 13; Spitz 2005, 627-628, 924). So what had happened? Only two years before, Beatlemania had swept the United States with the overnight success of the Fab Four on the Ed Sullivan Show; the following year saw the release of both films A Hard Day's Night and Help! and their critically acclaimed Rubber Soul, an album that took Beatles music to a new level of maturity. Had America suddenly grown tired of the Beatles? Was Beatlemania threatening to supplant American Christianity? Some might have thought so. A year before the storm broke, one parent worried that his daughter and her friends had developed "a real cult over the Beatles," complete with "Beatle prayers" uttered before a "Beatle altar" in one girl's bedroom (McKinney 2003, 142-143). In reality, the wind stirring up the 1966 "storm in a teacup" (Spitz 2005, 627) was not John Lennon, nor even Beatlemania, but rock 'n' roll itself. As detailed in this essay, many in the United States viewed rock as plagued with two principal problems: its African roots and its stimulation to dance. These two problems were related, since rock's presumed Africanness gave it dangerous rhythm. The racist denunciation of rock was not unique to the sixties; it went back a decade to rock's earliest moments, as Shane Maddock has shown (1996, 181-202). In 1956, for example, the White Citizens Council of Alabama denounced rock's sexual overtones, accusing the "basic, heavybeat music of the Negroes" of seducing unsuspecting white youth. Racist antagonism against rock only increased with the battle for civil rights and the "blanching of rock," as David Szatmary has called it (2000, 21-25; see also Romanowski 1996, 211-212). Racist prejudices in American popular music were nothing new, of course. In the 1910s, for example, jazz was called the musical "virus" of "colored ... groups that play for dancing ... they shake and jump and writhe in ways to suggest a return to the medieval jumping mania" (Osgood 1926, 11). The 1966 Beatles vs. Christianity debacle proved to be a watershed moment in the history of rock 'n' roll, since it brought out antirock racial prejudices as never before. As detailed in this essay, the scandal over the Beatles generated an unprecedented campaign of antirock propaganda that focused on the presumed African aspects of rock. This campaign was shortly followed by the emergence of Jesus Rock. From the late sixties to the late seventies, the expression Jesus Rock became the first Christian incarnation of rock, taming its black and dance elements. The Christian Contemporary Music phase completed this process. What Jesus Rock really changed was less rock music itself than its dressing; namely, the lifestyle and lyrics of rock performers. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耶稣摇滚的兴起:驯服“非洲节拍”
我们所见所闻,亲眼所见——约翰一书1:1 1966年3月4日,《伦敦旗帜晚报》(London Evening Standard)刊登了约翰·列侬(John Lennon)现在臭名昭著的那句话:“基督教会走....我们现在比耶稣还受欢迎;我不知道哪个会先消失——摇滚还是基督教”(P. Norman 2003,268)。大约五个月后,当这段引文的最后一部分被印在美国流行的青少年杂志《Datebook》的封面上,并加上一个感叹号——德文·麦金尼(Devin McKinney)所说的“有史以来最具影响力的标点符号之一”(引自《约翰的摇滚》1966年,50年)——用《时代》杂志(2003年,141年)的话来说,一切都火了起来。7月29日,列侬的“摇滚或基督教!”威胁登上报摊两天后,在阿拉巴马州伯明翰举行了公开焚烧披头士唱片的活动。很快,反披头士的狂热从南方蔓延到美国其他地区。到1966年9月,从纽约到里诺的美国人都在焚烧和禁止披头士的唱片;正如一家报纸所说,约翰·列侬(John Lennon)担心自己的生命安全,因为经纪人布莱恩·爱泼斯坦(Brian Epstein)试图“平息有关耶稣言论的风暴”;《新音乐快报》(New Musical Express)问道:“披头士在美国安全吗?”“披头士狂热已经死了吗?”《时代周刊》问道(“披头士经理……”)1966年,13;Spitz 2005, 627-628, 924)。那么发生了什么?就在两年前,披头士狂热席卷了美国,披头士四人在《埃德·沙利文秀》(Ed Sullivan Show)上一夜成名;第二年,两部电影《一夜狂欢》和《救命!》以及他们广受好评的《橡胶灵魂》,这张专辑将披头士的音乐推向了一个新的成熟阶段。难道美国人突然厌倦了披头士?披头士狂热是否威胁要取代美国的基督教?有些人可能是这么想的。在风暴爆发前一年,一位家长担心他的女儿和她的朋友们已经形成了“对披头士的真正崇拜”,甚至在一个女孩的卧室里的“披头士祭坛”前发出“披头士祈祷”(McKinney 2003, 142-143)。事实上,激起1966年“茶杯风暴”(Spitz 2005, 627)的风不是约翰·列侬,甚至也不是披头士狂热,而是摇滚本身。正如本文所详述的那样,许多美国人认为摇滚有两个主要问题:它的非洲根源和对舞蹈的刺激。这两个问题是相互关联的,因为摇滚被认为是非洲人,这给了它危险的节奏。种族主义者对摇滚的谴责并不是60年代独有的;正如谢恩·马多克(Shane Maddock)所展示的(1996,181-202),这可以追溯到十年前摇滚最早的时刻。例如,1956年,阿拉巴马州白人公民委员会(White Citizens Council of Alabama)谴责摇滚的性色彩,指责“黑人的基本、重节拍音乐”引诱毫无戒心的白人青年。种族主义对摇滚的敌意只会随着民权斗争和大卫·萨特玛丽所说的“摇滚的漂白”而增加(2000,21 -25;另见Romanowski 1996, 211-212)。当然,美国流行音乐中的种族主义偏见并不是什么新鲜事。例如,在20世纪10年代,爵士乐被称为“有色人种”的音乐“病毒”。为跳舞而演奏的团体……他们摇晃、跳跃和扭动,暗示着中世纪跳跃狂热的回归”(Osgood 1926, 11)。1966年披头士对基督教的惨败被证明是摇滚历史上的一个分水岭,因为它带来了前所未有的反摇滚种族偏见。正如本文所详述的那样,披头士的丑闻引发了一场前所未有的反摇滚宣传运动,这场运动的重点是所谓的摇滚的非洲方面。这场运动之后不久,耶稣摇滚就出现了。从60年代末到70年代末,“耶稣摇滚”(Jesus Rock)一词成为摇滚的第一个基督教化身,驯服了它的黑色和舞蹈元素。基督教当代音乐阶段完成了这一过程。耶稣摇滚真正改变的不是摇滚乐本身,而是它的着装;也就是摇滚歌手的生活方式和歌词。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ragga Soca Burning the Moral Compass: An Analysis of "Hellfire" Lyrics in the Music of Bunji Garlin Freedom Songs: Helping Black Activists, Black Residents, and White Volunteers Work Together in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, during the Summer of 1964 "Cien porciento tico tico": Reggae, Belonging, and the Afro-Caribbean Ticos of Costa Rica Revisiting the Katanga Guitar Style(s) and Some Other Early African Guitar Idioms Las Tonadas Trinitarias: History of an Afro-Cuban Musical Tradition from Trinidad de Cuba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1