THE ENHANCEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND SELF-EFFICACY AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH LEARNING- BASED PROBLEMS CONTEXTUAL MODEL
{"title":"THE ENHANCEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND SELF-EFFICACY AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH LEARNING- BASED PROBLEMS CONTEXTUAL MODEL","authors":"Waode Listiani","doi":"10.31327/JOMEDU.V1I2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem in this research is the low geometric reasoning abilities related to levels that van Hiele level 2 (abstraction) and level 3 (deduction) are not achieved its full potential. This research is a quasi experimental design with nonequivalen control group design. This is influenced by the students' ability to reason logically problem remains low, there has been no student's readiness or understanding of mathematical concepts is not optimal. Low student confidence shown from negative attitudes to learning. Based on the results of the study found that: 1) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning abilities of students; 2) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have high self-efficacy; 3) The learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have self-efficacy were; 4) There is no influence of van Hiele model of learning and conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have low self-efficacy","PeriodicalId":337698,"journal":{"name":"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31327/JOMEDU.V1I2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The problem in this research is the low geometric reasoning abilities related to levels that van Hiele level 2 (abstraction) and level 3 (deduction) are not achieved its full potential. This research is a quasi experimental design with nonequivalen control group design. This is influenced by the students' ability to reason logically problem remains low, there has been no student's readiness or understanding of mathematical concepts is not optimal. Low student confidence shown from negative attitudes to learning. Based on the results of the study found that: 1) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning abilities of students; 2) learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have high self-efficacy; 3) The learning model van Hiele had a greater impact than conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have self-efficacy were; 4) There is no influence of van Hiele model of learning and conventional learning models to geometric reasoning skills in students who have low self-efficacy
本研究的问题在于van Hiele第2级(抽象)和第3级(演绎)相关层次的几何推理能力较低,没有充分发挥其潜力。本研究采用非等效对照组设计的准实验设计。这是受学生逻辑推理能力低下问题的影响,没有出现学生对数学概念的准备或理解不够理想的情况。消极的学习态度表现出学生的自信心不足。基于研究结果发现:1)van Hiele学习模式对学生几何推理能力的影响大于传统学习模式;2) van Hiele学习模式对高自我效能学生几何推理技能的影响大于传统学习模式;3) van Hiele学习模式对具有自我效能感的学生几何推理能力的影响大于传统学习模式;4)低自我效能感学生的几何推理能力不受van Hiele学习模式和传统学习模式的影响