Estimation of a Structural Labour Supply Model for Belgium: Application to the Earnings Test for Pension Recipients

M. Maes
{"title":"Estimation of a Structural Labour Supply Model for Belgium: Application to the Earnings Test for Pension Recipients","authors":"M. Maes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2496817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In several OECD countries pension benefits are taxed away if retirees continue working and receive earnings that cross a threshold. Recently governments started to increase these earnings thresholds for working pensioners. On the basis of Belgian administrative data covering the years before and after such a reform, we show that bunching at a convex kink of the budget constraint tracks these tax rule changes. To account also for income effects along other parts of the piecewise-linear budget constraint, we estimate a structural labour supply model. A removal of the earnings test would lead to an increase of 2.44 hours worked per week but causes a budgetary deficit as well: pension benefits will be claimed earlier (as the deferral rate for pensions equals zero in Belgium) while social contribution revenues fall back. The intuition is that the income effect which leads high-earners to work less partly offsets the substitution effect which stimulates low-earner (previously at the convex kink) to work more.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netspar Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2496817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In several OECD countries pension benefits are taxed away if retirees continue working and receive earnings that cross a threshold. Recently governments started to increase these earnings thresholds for working pensioners. On the basis of Belgian administrative data covering the years before and after such a reform, we show that bunching at a convex kink of the budget constraint tracks these tax rule changes. To account also for income effects along other parts of the piecewise-linear budget constraint, we estimate a structural labour supply model. A removal of the earnings test would lead to an increase of 2.44 hours worked per week but causes a budgetary deficit as well: pension benefits will be claimed earlier (as the deferral rate for pensions equals zero in Belgium) while social contribution revenues fall back. The intuition is that the income effect which leads high-earners to work less partly offsets the substitution effect which stimulates low-earner (previously at the convex kink) to work more.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比利时结构性劳动力供给模型的估计:在养老金领取者收入检验中的应用
在几个经合组织国家,如果退休人员继续工作并获得超过阈值的收入,养老金福利就会被征税。最近,政府开始提高在职养老金领取者的收入门槛。在比利时行政数据的基础上,涵盖了改革前后的年份,我们表明,在预算约束的凸结处聚集跟踪这些税收规则的变化。为了考虑分段线性预算约束的其他部分的收入影响,我们估计了一个结构性劳动力供给模型。取消收入测试将导致每周工作时间增加2.44小时,但也会导致预算赤字:养老金福利将提前领取(因为养老金的递延率在比利时等于零),而社会缴款收入将下降。直觉是,导致高收入者减少工作的收入效应部分抵消了刺激低收入者(先前处于凸结)增加工作的替代效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consumers’ Decaying Generosity Can Sustain a Profit-Oriented Firm Dependent on Social Preferences The Malthusian Origins of the General Theory: Or How Keynes Came to Write a Book About Say’s Law and Effective Demand Review of Divine Economics Framework Financialization and Hysteresis: The Case of Chile Several Considerations on Commercial Techniques, in the Student's Interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1