The New Jim Crow

Michelle Alexander
{"title":"The New Jim Crow","authors":"Michelle Alexander","doi":"10.4324/9781315201511-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject that I intend to explore today is one that most Americans seem content to ignore. Conversations and debates about race-much less racial casteare frequently dismissed as yesterday's news, not relevant to the current era. Media pundits and more than a few politicians insist that we, as a nation, have finally \"moved beyond race.\" We have entered into the era of \"post-racialism,\" it is said, the promised land of colorblindness. Not just in America, but around the world, President Obama's election has been touted as the final nail in the coffin of Jim Crow, the bookend placed on the history of racial caste in America. This triumphant notion of post-racialism is, in my view, nothing more than fiction-a type of Orwellian doublespeak made no less sinister by virtue of the fact that the people saying it may actually believe it. Racial caste is not dead; it is alive and well in America. The mass incarceration of poor people of color in the United States amounts to a new caste system-one specifically tailored to the political, economic, and social challenges of our time. It is the moral equivalent of Jim Crow. I am well aware that this kind of claim may be hard for many people to swallow. Particularly if you, yourself, have never spent time in prison or been labeled a felon, the claim may seem downright absurd. I, myself, rejected the notion that something akin to a racial caste system could be functioning in the United States more than a decade ago-something that I now deeply regret. I first encountered the idea of a new racial caste system in the mid-1990s when I was rushing to catch the bus in Oakland, California and a bright orange poster caught my eye. It screamed in large bold print: THE DRUG WAR IS THE NEW JIM CROW. I recall pausing for a moment and skimming the text of the flyer. A radical group was holding a community meeting about police brutality, the new three-strikes law in California, the drug war, and the expansion of America's prison system. The meeting was being held at a small community church a few blocks away; it had seating capacity for no more than fifty people. I sighed and muttered to myself something like, \"Yeah, the criminal justice system is racist in many ways, but it really doesn't help to make such absurd comparisons. People will just think you're crazy.\" I then crossed the street and hopped on the","PeriodicalId":235532,"journal":{"name":"Power and Inequality","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5045","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315201511-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5045

Abstract

The subject that I intend to explore today is one that most Americans seem content to ignore. Conversations and debates about race-much less racial casteare frequently dismissed as yesterday's news, not relevant to the current era. Media pundits and more than a few politicians insist that we, as a nation, have finally "moved beyond race." We have entered into the era of "post-racialism," it is said, the promised land of colorblindness. Not just in America, but around the world, President Obama's election has been touted as the final nail in the coffin of Jim Crow, the bookend placed on the history of racial caste in America. This triumphant notion of post-racialism is, in my view, nothing more than fiction-a type of Orwellian doublespeak made no less sinister by virtue of the fact that the people saying it may actually believe it. Racial caste is not dead; it is alive and well in America. The mass incarceration of poor people of color in the United States amounts to a new caste system-one specifically tailored to the political, economic, and social challenges of our time. It is the moral equivalent of Jim Crow. I am well aware that this kind of claim may be hard for many people to swallow. Particularly if you, yourself, have never spent time in prison or been labeled a felon, the claim may seem downright absurd. I, myself, rejected the notion that something akin to a racial caste system could be functioning in the United States more than a decade ago-something that I now deeply regret. I first encountered the idea of a new racial caste system in the mid-1990s when I was rushing to catch the bus in Oakland, California and a bright orange poster caught my eye. It screamed in large bold print: THE DRUG WAR IS THE NEW JIM CROW. I recall pausing for a moment and skimming the text of the flyer. A radical group was holding a community meeting about police brutality, the new three-strikes law in California, the drug war, and the expansion of America's prison system. The meeting was being held at a small community church a few blocks away; it had seating capacity for no more than fifty people. I sighed and muttered to myself something like, "Yeah, the criminal justice system is racist in many ways, but it really doesn't help to make such absurd comparisons. People will just think you're crazy." I then crossed the street and hopped on the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新种族歧视
我今天要探讨的主题是大多数美国人似乎乐于忽视的。关于种族的对话和辩论——更不用说种族种姓了——经常被当作昨天的新闻而不予理睬,与当前时代无关。媒体权威人士和不少政客坚持认为,作为一个国家,我们终于“超越了种族”。我们已经进入了“后种族主义”时代,有人说,这是色盲的乐土。不仅在美国,而且在全世界,奥巴马总统的当选被吹捧为终结吉姆·克劳制度的最后一颗钉子,这是美国种族种姓历史的终结。在我看来,这种后种族主义的胜利概念只不过是虚构的——一种奥威尔式的双重性,因为说这种话的人可能真的相信它,所以它的险恶程度丝毫没有降低。种族等级并没有消亡;它在美国依然生机勃勃。在美国,对有色人种穷人的大规模监禁相当于一种新的种姓制度——一种专门为我们这个时代的政治、经济和社会挑战量身定制的制度。这是道德上的吉姆·克劳(Jim Crow)。我很清楚,这种说法可能让很多人难以接受。特别是如果你自己从来没有在监狱里呆过,也没有被贴上重罪犯的标签,这种说法可能看起来完全荒谬。十多年前,我本人拒绝接受类似于种族种姓制度的东西可能在美国发挥作用的说法——我现在对此深感遗憾。上世纪90年代中期,我第一次接触到新种族种姓制度的概念,当时我在加州奥克兰赶公交车,一张亮橙色的海报引起了我的注意。它用粗体字大声疾呼:毒品战争是新的吉姆·克劳。我记得我停顿了一下,略读了一下传单上的文字。一个激进组织正在举行社区会议,讨论警察暴行、加州新的三振出局法、毒品战争和美国监狱系统的扩张。会议在几个街区外的一个小型社区教堂举行;它的座位不超过50人。我叹了口气,喃喃自语,“是的,刑事司法系统在很多方面都是种族主义的,但做这种荒谬的比较真的没有帮助。人们只会认为你疯了。”然后我穿过街道,跳上了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Still Manufacturing Consent The Future of Inequality A Right to the City? Domhoff, Mills, and Slow Power The New Forms of Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1