From Workplace Mistreatment to Job Insecurity: The Moderating Effect of Work Centrality.

Victoria Li, Lixin Jiang, X. Xu
{"title":"From Workplace Mistreatment to Job Insecurity: The Moderating Effect of Work Centrality.","authors":"Victoria Li, Lixin Jiang, X. Xu","doi":"10.1002/smi.2915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although outcomes of job insecurity have been extensively examined, researchers have paid significantly less attention to antecedents of job insecurity. However, in order to lessen and eliminate job insecurity, a deeper understanding of the sources of job insecurity is required. Among triggers of job insecurity, very few studies have examined workplace interpersonal relationships as predictors of job insecurity. To fill this research gap, we examine the relation between workplace mistreatment (i.e., workplace incivility, bullying, and abusive supervision) and job insecurity. Examining multiple forms of mistreatment also allows us to compare and contrast the relative impact of each workplace mistreatment on job insecurity. Further, we identify a group of individuals who are particularly vulnerable to the negative impact of workplace mistreatment - those who are high in work centrality. Across two lagged survey studies, we largely found that work centrality exacerbates the relations of workplace incivility, bullying, and abusive supervision with job insecurity. Thus, this research contributes to the occupational health literature by demonstrating the relative predictive power of multiple forms of workplace mistreatment on job insecurity and identifying a vulnerable group who might suffer more from workplace mistreatment (i.e., those high in work centrality).","PeriodicalId":309674,"journal":{"name":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Although outcomes of job insecurity have been extensively examined, researchers have paid significantly less attention to antecedents of job insecurity. However, in order to lessen and eliminate job insecurity, a deeper understanding of the sources of job insecurity is required. Among triggers of job insecurity, very few studies have examined workplace interpersonal relationships as predictors of job insecurity. To fill this research gap, we examine the relation between workplace mistreatment (i.e., workplace incivility, bullying, and abusive supervision) and job insecurity. Examining multiple forms of mistreatment also allows us to compare and contrast the relative impact of each workplace mistreatment on job insecurity. Further, we identify a group of individuals who are particularly vulnerable to the negative impact of workplace mistreatment - those who are high in work centrality. Across two lagged survey studies, we largely found that work centrality exacerbates the relations of workplace incivility, bullying, and abusive supervision with job insecurity. Thus, this research contributes to the occupational health literature by demonstrating the relative predictive power of multiple forms of workplace mistreatment on job insecurity and identifying a vulnerable group who might suffer more from workplace mistreatment (i.e., those high in work centrality).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从职场虐待到工作不安全感:工作中心性的调节作用。
尽管工作不安全感的结果已经得到了广泛的研究,但研究人员对工作不安全感的前因的关注却少得多。然而,为了减少和消除工作不安全感,需要更深入地了解工作不安全感的来源。在工作不安全感的触发因素中,很少有研究将职场人际关系作为工作不安全感的预测因素。为了填补这一研究空白,我们研究了工作场所虐待(即工作场所的不文明行为、欺凌和滥用监督)与工作不安全感之间的关系。检查多种形式的虐待也使我们能够比较和对比每种工作场所虐待对工作不安全感的相对影响。此外,我们确定了一群特别容易受到工作场所虐待负面影响的人——那些工作中心性高的人。在两项滞后的调查研究中,我们发现,工作中心性加剧了工作场所的不文明、欺凌和滥用监管与工作不安全感的关系。因此,本研究通过展示多种形式的工作场所虐待对工作不安全感的相对预测能力,并确定可能遭受更多工作场所虐待的弱势群体(即工作中心性高的群体),为职业健康文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of alexithymia in suicide ideation among Taiwanese army military personnel: A serial mediation model investigating the effects of perceived stress and depression. Ageist attitudes and psychological distress in older adults: The moderating role of reflective functioning. Relationship between stigma and infertility-related stress among couples undergoing AID: The mediating role of communication patterns. Longitudinal mediation effect of hassles between neuroticism and dimensions of the tripartite model in college students. Unravelling the link between sleep and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1