A Test of Diverse Hypotheses about Smartphone Addiction and Juvenile Violent Delinquency: A Panel Study

Seong-sik Lee, S. Lim, S. Ryu
{"title":"A Test of Diverse Hypotheses about Smartphone Addiction and Juvenile Violent Delinquency: A Panel Study","authors":"Seong-sik Lee, S. Lim, S. Ryu","doi":"10.25277/kcpr.2023.19.2.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between smartphone addiction and online and offline violent delinquency, adds relationships with parents, teachers, and peers, and intends to test four hypotheses for relationships among three variables. There are four hypotheses; first, strain-inducing hypothesis that smartphone addiction has negative influences on relationships with parents, teachers, and peers, which in turn affect both online and offline violent delinquency, second, strain reducing or spurious relationship hypothesis that relationships with parents, teachers, and peers explain both smartphone addiction and violent delinquency and the relationship between smartphone addiction and violent delinquency is spurious, third, opportunity hypothesis that the effects of relationships with parents, teachers, and friends on violent delinquency are mediated by smartphone addiction, and fourth, condition hypothesis that expects the interaction effect between smartphone addiction and relationships with parents, teachers, and peers on violent delinquency. This study tests relative efficacy among four hypotheses by using data from a panel study. Results show that smartphone addiction has effects on both relationships with parents and teachers, but it has not indirect but direct effect on both online and offline violent delinquency, which does not support strain-inducing hypothesis. Instead, relationships with parents and teachers have indirect effects on online violent delinquency through smartphone addiction, which supports opportunity hypothesis, but it is also shown that they have also indirect effects on offline violent delinquency and relationships with teachers and peers have direct effects on online violent delinquency. Results also do not support spurious hypothesis, and it is also shown that condition hypothesis is not supported. Overall, the effect of smartphone addiction is significant on both online and offline violent delinquency.","PeriodicalId":246265,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association of Criminal Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association of Criminal Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25277/kcpr.2023.19.2.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between smartphone addiction and online and offline violent delinquency, adds relationships with parents, teachers, and peers, and intends to test four hypotheses for relationships among three variables. There are four hypotheses; first, strain-inducing hypothesis that smartphone addiction has negative influences on relationships with parents, teachers, and peers, which in turn affect both online and offline violent delinquency, second, strain reducing or spurious relationship hypothesis that relationships with parents, teachers, and peers explain both smartphone addiction and violent delinquency and the relationship between smartphone addiction and violent delinquency is spurious, third, opportunity hypothesis that the effects of relationships with parents, teachers, and friends on violent delinquency are mediated by smartphone addiction, and fourth, condition hypothesis that expects the interaction effect between smartphone addiction and relationships with parents, teachers, and peers on violent delinquency. This study tests relative efficacy among four hypotheses by using data from a panel study. Results show that smartphone addiction has effects on both relationships with parents and teachers, but it has not indirect but direct effect on both online and offline violent delinquency, which does not support strain-inducing hypothesis. Instead, relationships with parents and teachers have indirect effects on online violent delinquency through smartphone addiction, which supports opportunity hypothesis, but it is also shown that they have also indirect effects on offline violent delinquency and relationships with teachers and peers have direct effects on online violent delinquency. Results also do not support spurious hypothesis, and it is also shown that condition hypothesis is not supported. Overall, the effect of smartphone addiction is significant on both online and offline violent delinquency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能手机成瘾与青少年暴力犯罪的多元假设检验:一项小组研究
本研究考察了智能手机成瘾与线上和线下暴力犯罪之间的关系,增加了与父母、老师和同龄人的关系,并打算测试三个变量之间关系的四个假设。有四种假设;一是压力诱导假说,即智能手机成瘾对与父母、老师和同伴的关系有负面影响,进而影响线上和线下的暴力犯罪;二是压力减少或虚假关系假说,即与父母、老师和同伴的关系可以解释智能手机成瘾和暴力犯罪,并且智能手机成瘾和暴力犯罪之间的关系是虚假的;机会假说认为,父母、老师、朋友关系对暴力犯罪的影响是由智能手机成瘾介导的;条件假说认为,智能手机成瘾与父母、老师、同伴关系对暴力犯罪的影响是相互作用的。本研究通过小组研究的数据检验了四种假设的相对有效性。结果表明,智能手机成瘾对学生的亲子关系和教师关系均有影响,但对网络暴力犯罪和线下暴力犯罪均无直接影响,不支持压力诱导假说。相反,与父母和老师的关系通过智能手机成瘾对网络暴力犯罪有间接影响,支持机会假说,但也表明它们对线下暴力犯罪有间接影响,与教师和同伴的关系对网络暴力犯罪有直接影响。结果也不支持虚假假设,条件假设也不支持。总体而言,智能手机成瘾对线上和线下暴力犯罪的影响都很显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Horizons and Issues in the Trauma of Crime Victim A Study on on the People's Terrorism Response Behavior A Study on the Development Plan of Nationwide Special Judicial Police Suitable for the Dual Autonomous Police System The Effect of Violence Allowance on Dating Violation Perpetration : The Moderating Effect of Self-Esteem Analysis of Cyberbullying Perpetration Behaviors among Korean Adolescents Using Latent Class Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1