The Comparison of Supervision of Notaries and Land Deed Making Officials

Sulthon Faiz Saifuddin, I. Maerani
{"title":"The Comparison of Supervision of Notaries and Land Deed Making Officials","authors":"Sulthon Faiz Saifuddin, I. Maerani","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1274-1285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notaries and Land Deed Making Officials are public officials who are given the task, obligation and authority to make authentic deeds and are usually held by one person. Supervision of notaries and Land Deed Making Officials is a must because mistakes or omissions often occur during carrying out their positions. The author in this study tries to compare the supervision carried out on the notary and the Land Deed Making Officer with the aim of knowing the advantages and disadvantages of each supervisor based on the theory of supervision. This research is a normative juridical research by examining secondary data which is analyzed deductively. There are two legal theories used in this research, namely the theory of state power and the theory of supervision. The results showed that the supervision of the notary was carried out by two supervisory institutions, namely the Supervisory Council and the Honorary Council, while the supervision of the Land Deed Making Officer was carried out by two institutions, namely, the Supervisory Council and the Supervisor of the Land Deed Making Officer and the Association Honorary Council. Comparison of supervision between supervisory institutions is focused on four things, namely the form of supervision, type of supervision, supervisory mechanism and authority & scope of supervision. Based on these four things, the Supervisory Board is the best supervisory agency, while the other three supervisory institutions need to be improved through changes or additions to their legal rules.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1274-1285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notaries and Land Deed Making Officials are public officials who are given the task, obligation and authority to make authentic deeds and are usually held by one person. Supervision of notaries and Land Deed Making Officials is a must because mistakes or omissions often occur during carrying out their positions. The author in this study tries to compare the supervision carried out on the notary and the Land Deed Making Officer with the aim of knowing the advantages and disadvantages of each supervisor based on the theory of supervision. This research is a normative juridical research by examining secondary data which is analyzed deductively. There are two legal theories used in this research, namely the theory of state power and the theory of supervision. The results showed that the supervision of the notary was carried out by two supervisory institutions, namely the Supervisory Council and the Honorary Council, while the supervision of the Land Deed Making Officer was carried out by two institutions, namely, the Supervisory Council and the Supervisor of the Land Deed Making Officer and the Association Honorary Council. Comparison of supervision between supervisory institutions is focused on four things, namely the form of supervision, type of supervision, supervisory mechanism and authority & scope of supervision. Based on these four things, the Supervisory Board is the best supervisory agency, while the other three supervisory institutions need to be improved through changes or additions to their legal rules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公证员与土地契约官员监督之比较
公证人和土地契约制作官员是被赋予制作真实契约的任务、义务和权力的公职人员,通常由一人担任。对公证员和土地契约官员的监督是必须的,因为他们在履行职责过程中经常出现错误或遗漏。本文试图以监督理论为基础,对公证员和土地契据官的监督进行比较,以了解各自监督的优缺点。本研究是一项对二手资料进行检验并进行演绎分析的规范性法律研究。在本研究中使用了两种法律理论,即国家权力理论和监督理论。结果表明,对公证员的监督由监事会和荣誉理事会两个监督机构进行,对土地契约员的监督由监事会、土地契约员监事和协会荣誉理事会两个监督机构进行。监管机构之间的监管比较主要集中在四个方面,即监管形式、监管类型、监管机制和监管权限与范围。基于这四点,监事会是最好的监管机构,其他三种监管机构需要通过修改或增加其法律规则来完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Legal Protection for Debtors in the Implementation of Bad Credit Settlement with Guaranteed Objects of Mortgage The Role of Land Deed Maker Officials (PPAT) and the National Land Agency (BPN) in Prevention of Land Mafia The Role and Responsibilities of a Notary in Making a Certificate of Inheritance for Disbursement of Time Deposit Savings Funds by the Heirs Legal Protection for the Public for Legal Certainty of Notary Authentic Deeds Against Deeds That Are Not Read And Explained To The Parties The Role of Land Deed Maker Officials in Making the Deed of Transfer of Land Rights and Registration of Transfer of Names During the Covid-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1