Light exposure in home-based work: Can a simple lighting system increase alertness?

H. Rolf, L. Udovičić, S. Völker
{"title":"Light exposure in home-based work: Can a simple lighting system increase alertness?","authors":"H. Rolf, L. Udovičić, S. Völker","doi":"10.1177/14771535231158029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the proportion of digital and more flexible work in the western labour market increases, more and more employees are working at least partly from home. This development was even enhanced by the COVID-19-pandemic. In contrast to office workplaces, lighting at home-based workplaces is less studied and regulated. Lighting has been shown to not only ensure vision but also evoke non-image forming effects such as changes in alertness. In this study, light exposure of nine office employees at their home-based workplaces was investigated. Illuminance at home-based workplaces was found to be low, compared to office standards. In addition, melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance (MEDI) did not reach recommendations for healthy daytime light exposure. Furthermore, an additional lighting was installed at participants’ desks in order to examine possible effects on alertness. Mean illuminance and MEDI during work were increased by the additional lighting. A decrease in subjective sleepiness could be shown after 6 hours, although differences were not significant. Improvements of response time in a psychomotor vigilance task were already achieved at the beginning of work and after 3 hours. This study shows that lighting conditions at home-based workplaces often do not meet the criteria for health-promoting lighting in terms of non-image forming effects.","PeriodicalId":269493,"journal":{"name":"Lighting Research & Technology","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lighting Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535231158029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the proportion of digital and more flexible work in the western labour market increases, more and more employees are working at least partly from home. This development was even enhanced by the COVID-19-pandemic. In contrast to office workplaces, lighting at home-based workplaces is less studied and regulated. Lighting has been shown to not only ensure vision but also evoke non-image forming effects such as changes in alertness. In this study, light exposure of nine office employees at their home-based workplaces was investigated. Illuminance at home-based workplaces was found to be low, compared to office standards. In addition, melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance (MEDI) did not reach recommendations for healthy daytime light exposure. Furthermore, an additional lighting was installed at participants’ desks in order to examine possible effects on alertness. Mean illuminance and MEDI during work were increased by the additional lighting. A decrease in subjective sleepiness could be shown after 6 hours, although differences were not significant. Improvements of response time in a psychomotor vigilance task were already achieved at the beginning of work and after 3 hours. This study shows that lighting conditions at home-based workplaces often do not meet the criteria for health-promoting lighting in terms of non-image forming effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在家工作时的光照:一个简单的照明系统能提高警觉性吗?
由于数字化和更灵活的工作在西方劳动力市场中的比例上升,越来越多的员工至少部分在家工作。covid -19大流行甚至加强了这一发展。与办公室相比,家庭办公场所的照明较少受到研究和监管。照明已被证明不仅能保证视觉,还能引起非图像形成效应,如警觉性的变化。在这项研究中,九名办公室员工在他们的家庭工作场所的光暴露进行了调查。与办公室标准相比,居家办公场所的照度较低。此外,黑视等效日光照度(MEDI)没有达到健康的日间光照建议值。此外,在参与者的办公桌上安装了额外的照明,以检查对警觉性可能产生的影响。工作期间的平均照度和MEDI因额外照明而增加。6小时后主观困倦程度有所下降,但差异并不显著。精神运动警觉性任务的反应时间在工作开始时和3小时后已经得到改善。本研究表明,居家工作场所的照明条件在非形象形成效果方面往往不符合促进健康的照明标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Defining daytime in the day-dark approach to measuring the pedestrian reassurance of road lighting Editorial: The many faces of sustainability in lighting research Recommendations for light-dosimetry field studies based on a meta-analysis of personal light levels of office workers Opinion: Embracing ‘anthropogenic’ over ‘artificial’ light at night Opinion: The role of outdoor lighting with pedestrian reassurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1