Bed-Detection Sensitivity Employing 1D Response to an Electric Dipole Source in Multilayer Anisotropic Formations

Joshua Bautista-Anguiano, T. Hagiwara
{"title":"Bed-Detection Sensitivity Employing 1D Response to an Electric Dipole Source in Multilayer Anisotropic Formations","authors":"Joshua Bautista-Anguiano, T. Hagiwara","doi":"10.30632/pjv63n4-2022a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electric and magnetic field responses originating from a primary electric current source have been analytically derived, explored, and employed to explore and detect electrical anomalies due to the presence of a bed boundary in a two-layer model, using the controlled source electromagnetic method. However, previous works on the subject demand in-depth knowledge of mathematics, which could become an obstacle for the practitioner looking to immerse into the realm of induction logging and who needs a straightforward approach to develop their algorithms. Consequently, we introduce the analytical expressions for electric and magnetic field responses to an electric current dipole source arbitrarily oriented in one-dimension (1D) transversely isotropic media. In addition, we apply these equations to examine both electric and magnetic field responses to a distant resistive anomaly from electric transverse electric dipole transmitters. Our analysis shows that magnetic field responses are significantly more sensitive to the anomaly ahead of the tool for a vertical or a horizontal borehole. While the coplanar electric field measurements with conventional electric resistivity tools are known to be sensitive to the resistivity anomaly around the tool, the axial magnetic field measurement using the transverse electric dipole transmitter and the transverse magnetic field measurement using an axial electric dipole transmitter are significantly more sensitive to the anomaly around the tool than any electric field measurements. This deep-looking capability is achieved with a relatively short source-receiver spacing of 10 m. Based on the increased deep-looking capability, we encourage the use of magnetic components from our generalized geosteering tool based on electric dipole sources because it can potentially flag anomalies at a distance 60% further in comparison to the sensitivity of electric measurements.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv63n4-2022a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric and magnetic field responses originating from a primary electric current source have been analytically derived, explored, and employed to explore and detect electrical anomalies due to the presence of a bed boundary in a two-layer model, using the controlled source electromagnetic method. However, previous works on the subject demand in-depth knowledge of mathematics, which could become an obstacle for the practitioner looking to immerse into the realm of induction logging and who needs a straightforward approach to develop their algorithms. Consequently, we introduce the analytical expressions for electric and magnetic field responses to an electric current dipole source arbitrarily oriented in one-dimension (1D) transversely isotropic media. In addition, we apply these equations to examine both electric and magnetic field responses to a distant resistive anomaly from electric transverse electric dipole transmitters. Our analysis shows that magnetic field responses are significantly more sensitive to the anomaly ahead of the tool for a vertical or a horizontal borehole. While the coplanar electric field measurements with conventional electric resistivity tools are known to be sensitive to the resistivity anomaly around the tool, the axial magnetic field measurement using the transverse electric dipole transmitter and the transverse magnetic field measurement using an axial electric dipole transmitter are significantly more sensitive to the anomaly around the tool than any electric field measurements. This deep-looking capability is achieved with a relatively short source-receiver spacing of 10 m. Based on the increased deep-looking capability, we encourage the use of magnetic components from our generalized geosteering tool based on electric dipole sources because it can potentially flag anomalies at a distance 60% further in comparison to the sensitivity of electric measurements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多层各向异性地层中电偶极子源一维响应的床层探测灵敏度
利用可控源电磁方法,对一次电流源产生的电场和磁场响应进行了解析推导和探索,并用于探测和检测由于两层模型中存在床层边界而导致的电异常。然而,先前关于该主题的工作需要深入的数学知识,这可能成为从业者希望沉浸在归纳日志领域的障碍,他们需要一种直接的方法来开发他们的算法。因此,我们引入了在一维(1D)横向各向同性介质中任意定向的电流偶极子源的电场和磁场响应的解析表达式。此外,我们应用这些方程来检查电横向电偶极发射机对远距离电阻异常的电场和磁场响应。我们的分析表明,无论是垂直井眼还是水平井眼,磁场响应对工具前方的异常都要敏感得多。虽然已知使用传统电阻率工具进行共面电场测量对工具周围的电阻率异常敏感,但使用横向电偶极变送器进行轴向磁场测量和使用轴向电偶极变送器进行横向磁场测量对工具周围异常的敏感性明显高于任何电场测量。这种深度探测能力是通过相对较短的10米的源接收器间距实现的。基于深度探测能力的提高,我们鼓励使用基于电偶极子源的广义地质导向工具中的磁性元件,因为与电测量的灵敏度相比,它可以在距离远60%的地方标记异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Geological Facies Analysis in Crust-Mantle Transition Zone Petrophysical Analyses for Supporting the Search for a Claystone-Hosted Nuclear Repository A New R35 and Fractal Joint Rock Typing Method Using MICP Analysis: A Case Study in Middle East Iraq Nuclear Logging in Geological Probing for a Low-Carbon Energy Future – A New Frontier? Underground Hydrogen Storage in Porous Media: The Potential Role of Petrophysics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1