{"title":"15N as a marker for effed efficiency in beef cattle","authors":"M. Marcondes","doi":"10.24072/pci.animsci.100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Line 38. Specify which percentage does “extreme animals” refer to [AU]: Sorry but this specification was already shown in the first version “the top 20% highest and lowest animals within-CG in terms of RFI and FCE (extreme animals)” Introduction Line 70. Suggest “ranking individual animals” [AU]: Done Line 77. I think there is a leap in the explanation regarding feed sorting. Consider expanding with one or two sentences to clarify the point [AU]: Done, thank you. Materials and Methods Lines 119-120. Did the authors try running the analyses both with and without Study #8, as 15N abundance was not measured in plasma urea but in muscle? [AU]: In a previous experiment from our team (Nasrollahi et al.2020) we obtained similar relationships between Δ15N and feed efficiency regardless the isotopic analysis was conducted on plasma or muscle. We did not try to remove study ID#8 because we consider that all animal proteins once the isotopic equilibrium is reached has similar isotopic signatures (excepting the case of hair where no turnover exist). We have added in L178-181 the following statement to justify it: According to previous results from our team (Nasrollahi et al., 2020) and to allow sufficient time to reach an isotopic equilibrium, Δ15Nanimal-diet","PeriodicalId":117264,"journal":{"name":"Peer Community In Animal Science","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peer Community In Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.animsci.100012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Line 38. Specify which percentage does “extreme animals” refer to [AU]: Sorry but this specification was already shown in the first version “the top 20% highest and lowest animals within-CG in terms of RFI and FCE (extreme animals)” Introduction Line 70. Suggest “ranking individual animals” [AU]: Done Line 77. I think there is a leap in the explanation regarding feed sorting. Consider expanding with one or two sentences to clarify the point [AU]: Done, thank you. Materials and Methods Lines 119-120. Did the authors try running the analyses both with and without Study #8, as 15N abundance was not measured in plasma urea but in muscle? [AU]: In a previous experiment from our team (Nasrollahi et al.2020) we obtained similar relationships between Δ15N and feed efficiency regardless the isotopic analysis was conducted on plasma or muscle. We did not try to remove study ID#8 because we consider that all animal proteins once the isotopic equilibrium is reached has similar isotopic signatures (excepting the case of hair where no turnover exist). We have added in L178-181 the following statement to justify it: According to previous results from our team (Nasrollahi et al., 2020) and to allow sufficient time to reach an isotopic equilibrium, Δ15Nanimal-diet
行38。指定“极端动物”指的百分比[AU]:对不起,这个规范已经在第一个版本中显示了“根据RFI和FCE(极端动物),cg内最高和最低的20%的动物”引言第70行。建议“给单个动物排序”[AU]:完成第77行。我认为关于提要排序的解释有一个飞跃。考虑用一到两句话来阐明要点:完成,谢谢。材料和方法第119-120行。由于15N丰度不是在血浆尿素中测量的,而是在肌肉中测量的,作者是否尝试在有和没有研究8的情况下进行分析?[AU]:在我们团队(Nasrollahi et al.2020)之前的实验中,我们获得了Δ15N与饲料效率之间的类似关系,无论对血浆或肌肉进行同位素分析。我们没有试图删除研究ID#8,因为我们认为一旦达到同位素平衡,所有动物蛋白都具有相似的同位素特征(除了毛发没有周转的情况)。我们在L178-181中添加了以下声明来证明它:根据我们团队之前的结果(Nasrollahi et al., 2020),并允许有足够的时间达到同位素平衡,Δ15Nanimal-diet