Egoism and the Limits of Ethics

Jared K. Rothstein
{"title":"Egoism and the Limits of Ethics","authors":"Jared K. Rothstein","doi":"10.33790/jmhsb1100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author discusses his experiences as the son of divorced parents, one a proud egoist and the other a dutiful altruist, and the resultant challenges in his own romantic life. Based on research from evolutionary psychology, he argues that ethical egoists and their critics have typically committed the same core error. By imputing a false dichotomy between ‘selfishness’ and ‘altruism,’ all sides have obscured the motivational intricacy of human behavior and the moral nuance entailed. How much of your own needs and happiness should be sacrificed for those you love? Drawing on Aristotelian insight, the author concludes that this is one of the most confounding ethical quandaries in life--which no moral theory can conclusively resolve.","PeriodicalId":179784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health and Social Behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health and Social Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33790/jmhsb1100161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author discusses his experiences as the son of divorced parents, one a proud egoist and the other a dutiful altruist, and the resultant challenges in his own romantic life. Based on research from evolutionary psychology, he argues that ethical egoists and their critics have typically committed the same core error. By imputing a false dichotomy between ‘selfishness’ and ‘altruism,’ all sides have obscured the motivational intricacy of human behavior and the moral nuance entailed. How much of your own needs and happiness should be sacrificed for those you love? Drawing on Aristotelian insight, the author concludes that this is one of the most confounding ethical quandaries in life--which no moral theory can conclusively resolve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利己主义与伦理学的局限
作者讨论了他作为离异父母的儿子的经历,一个是骄傲的利己主义者,另一个是尽职的利他主义者,以及他自己的浪漫生活中由此产生的挑战。基于进化心理学的研究,他认为道德利己主义者和他们的批评者通常都犯了同样的核心错误。通过在“自私”和“利他”之间强加一种错误的二分法,各方都模糊了人类行为动机的复杂性和由此带来的道德上的细微差别。为了你爱的人,你应该牺牲多少自己的需要和幸福?根据亚里士多德的见解,作者得出结论,这是生活中最令人困惑的伦理困境之一,没有任何道德理论可以最终解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frustration, Examination, Appreciation: An Autoethnography of a Psychotherapist’s Work with a Challenging Patient The Essential Need to Clearly Define Addiction Criticism in Literature Studies Relieving Pandemic-Related Psychological Distress: Key Protective Factors Against Mental Health Impairment An Increasing Bilateral Advantage in Chinese Reading Challenges Faced by Mexican Americans when Accessing Mental Health Care Service Utilization along the South Texas – Mexico border
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1