Temperature dependence of $\eta/s$: uncertainties from the equation of state

J. Auvinen, K. Eskola, P. Huovinen, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, P. Petreczky
{"title":"Temperature dependence of $\\eta/s$: uncertainties from the equation of state","authors":"J. Auvinen, K. Eskola, P. Huovinen, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, P. Petreczky","doi":"10.22323/1.336.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We perform a global model-to-data comparison on Au+Au collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV and Pb+Pb collisions at $2.76$ TeV and $5.02$ TeV, using a 2+1D hydrodynamics model with the EKRT initial state and a shear viscosity over entropy density ratio $(\\eta/s)(T)$ with a linear $T$ dependence. To quantify the amount of uncertainty due to the choice of the equation of state (EoS), we compare analysis results based on four different EoSs: the well known $s95p$ parametrisation, an updated parametrisation based on the same list of particles in hadron resonance gas, but using recent lattice results for the partonic part of the EoS, and two new parametrisations based on the Particle Data Group 2016 particle list and the recent lattice results. We find that the choice of the EoS does affect the favoured minimum value of $\\eta/s$, although within the confidence limits of the analysis. On the other hand, our analysis hardly constrains the temperature dependence of $\\eta/s$, no matter the EoS.","PeriodicalId":441384,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of XIII Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum — PoS(Confinement2018)","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of XIII Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum — PoS(Confinement2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22323/1.336.0135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We perform a global model-to-data comparison on Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV and Pb+Pb collisions at $2.76$ TeV and $5.02$ TeV, using a 2+1D hydrodynamics model with the EKRT initial state and a shear viscosity over entropy density ratio $(\eta/s)(T)$ with a linear $T$ dependence. To quantify the amount of uncertainty due to the choice of the equation of state (EoS), we compare analysis results based on four different EoSs: the well known $s95p$ parametrisation, an updated parametrisation based on the same list of particles in hadron resonance gas, but using recent lattice results for the partonic part of the EoS, and two new parametrisations based on the Particle Data Group 2016 particle list and the recent lattice results. We find that the choice of the EoS does affect the favoured minimum value of $\eta/s$, although within the confidence limits of the analysis. On the other hand, our analysis hardly constrains the temperature dependence of $\eta/s$, no matter the EoS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
$\eta/s$的温度依赖性:状态方程的不确定性
我们对$\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV的Au+Au碰撞和$2.76$ TeV和$5.02$ TeV的Pb+Pb碰撞进行了全局模型-数据比较,使用2+1D流体力学模型,具有EKRT初始状态和剪切粘度/熵密度比$(\eta/s)(T)$,并具有线性$T$依赖。为了量化由于选择状态方程(EoS)而导致的不确定性,我们比较了基于四种不同的EoS的分析结果:众所周知的$s95p$参数化,基于强子共振气体中相同粒子列表的更新参数化,但使用了EoS的部分子部分的最新晶格结果,以及基于粒子数据组2016粒子列表和最近晶格结果的两种新参数化。我们发现EoS的选择确实影响了最有利的最小值$\eta/s$,尽管在分析的置信范围内。另一方面,我们的分析几乎不限制$\eta/s$的温度依赖性,无论EoS如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fractal structure, power-law distribution and hadron spectrum A Model for Soft and Hard Interactions based on the CGC/Saturation Approach Proper time evolution of magnetic susceptibility in amagnetized plasma of quarks and gluons Transport in Dense Nuclear Matter Higher-order condensate corrections to bottomonium observables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1