{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"Xuefei Ren","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691203393.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the consequences of the territorial and associational forms of the governing cities in China and India. It analyzes why China's and India's approach have not been able to deliver a just and equitable urban growth. It looks into the territorial forms of governance in China that have created not only a deep cleavage between urban and rural areas, but also unprecedented levels of disparity across cities and towns throughout the country. The chapter also looks into the associational politics of India that has produced inequalities and caused the exclusion of citizens from particular alliances and partnerships. It emphasizes how China and India should move forward by adopting a model that can empower municipal-level urban authorities in order to preserve space for democratic deliberation.","PeriodicalId":360053,"journal":{"name":"Governing the Urban in China and India","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governing the Urban in China and India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691203393.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses the consequences of the territorial and associational forms of the governing cities in China and India. It analyzes why China's and India's approach have not been able to deliver a just and equitable urban growth. It looks into the territorial forms of governance in China that have created not only a deep cleavage between urban and rural areas, but also unprecedented levels of disparity across cities and towns throughout the country. The chapter also looks into the associational politics of India that has produced inequalities and caused the exclusion of citizens from particular alliances and partnerships. It emphasizes how China and India should move forward by adopting a model that can empower municipal-level urban authorities in order to preserve space for democratic deliberation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结论
本章讨论了中国和印度统治城市的领土和联合形式的后果。它分析了为什么中国和印度的方法无法实现公正和公平的城市增长。它研究了中国的领土治理形式,这些形式不仅造成了城乡之间的深刻鸿沟,而且造成了全国城镇之间前所未有的差距。本章还研究了印度的联合政治,这种政治产生了不平等,并导致公民被排除在特定的联盟和伙伴关系之外。报告强调,中国和印度应该采取一种模式,赋予市级城市当局权力,以保留民主审议的空间,从而向前迈进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index 4. Urban Redevelopment in Guangzhou and Mumbai Frontmatter 5. Airpocalypse in Beijing and Delhi List of Figures and Tables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1