Assessment of the Quality of Norm-Setting in the Educational System in a Modern School

E. Koval, A. Sychev, Nataliya Zhadunova
{"title":"Assessment of the Quality of Norm-Setting in the Educational System in a Modern School","authors":"E. Koval, A. Sychev, Nataliya Zhadunova","doi":"10.26907/esd.18.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of the educational process often cause criticism from the state, parental and pedagogical communities and society as a whole. This is due to the fact that norms created at the institutional level of the education system do not always allow achieving goals at the procedural level. It is the school teacher, as a key subject of educational activity, who is able to give the most reasonable answer to the question if the existing norms really help to achieve educational goals. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to assess the quality of norms and norm-setting in the field of education and to determine the possibilities and prospects for the deliberate participation of the pedagogical community in it. An expert survey of practicing teachers (N = 87) was conducted with the help of Google Forms service. Respondents evaluated the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation; federal laws; codes of pedagogical ethics, etc. The experts' assessment of the norms showed that normative regulation of the sphere of education set the important priorities in upbringing. However, there are problems associated with the implementation of these priorities due to excessive bureaucratization; limitation of the creative potential of teachers; unwillingness to constructively interact with other subjects of norm-setting, etc. The majority of teachers cannot influence the creation, change or abolition of norms that regulate the educational process at school (with the exception of the local norms). But they are ready to actively participate in the public discussion of the norms regulating upbringing. The research results can be used to further study of the education system through the prism of norm-setting activity, and can also be useful for the formation and implementation of mechanisms for the participation of the pedagogical community in determining the value-normative priorities of upbringing.","PeriodicalId":158711,"journal":{"name":"Education & Self Development","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education & Self Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of the educational process often cause criticism from the state, parental and pedagogical communities and society as a whole. This is due to the fact that norms created at the institutional level of the education system do not always allow achieving goals at the procedural level. It is the school teacher, as a key subject of educational activity, who is able to give the most reasonable answer to the question if the existing norms really help to achieve educational goals. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to assess the quality of norms and norm-setting in the field of education and to determine the possibilities and prospects for the deliberate participation of the pedagogical community in it. An expert survey of practicing teachers (N = 87) was conducted with the help of Google Forms service. Respondents evaluated the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation; federal laws; codes of pedagogical ethics, etc. The experts' assessment of the norms showed that normative regulation of the sphere of education set the important priorities in upbringing. However, there are problems associated with the implementation of these priorities due to excessive bureaucratization; limitation of the creative potential of teachers; unwillingness to constructively interact with other subjects of norm-setting, etc. The majority of teachers cannot influence the creation, change or abolition of norms that regulate the educational process at school (with the exception of the local norms). But they are ready to actively participate in the public discussion of the norms regulating upbringing. The research results can be used to further study of the education system through the prism of norm-setting activity, and can also be useful for the formation and implementation of mechanisms for the participation of the pedagogical community in determining the value-normative priorities of upbringing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代学校教育体系规范制定质量评价
教育过程的结果经常引起来自国家、家长和教育团体以及整个社会的批评。这是因为在教育制度的体制一级制定的规范并不总是允许在程序一级实现目标。学校教师作为教育活动的关键主体,能够对现有规范是否真的有助于实现教育目标的问题给出最合理的答案。在这方面,这项研究的目的是评估教育领域的规范和制定规范的质量,并确定教育界有意参与其中的可能性和前景。利用Google Forms服务对87名在职教师进行专家调查。受访者对俄罗斯联邦宪法的规范进行了评估;联邦法律;教学道德规范等。专家们对规范的评估表明,教育领域的规范规定了养育方面的重要优先事项。但是,由于过度官僚化,在执行这些优先事项方面存在一些问题;试论教师创造潜力的有限性不愿意与其他主体进行建设性的互动。大多数教师不能影响制定、改变或废除规范学校教育过程的规范(地方规范除外)。但他们已经准备好积极参与有关规范教养的公共讨论。研究结果可用于通过规范制定活动的棱镜进一步研究教育系统,也可用于形成和实施机制,以便教育社区参与确定培养的价值-规范优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shock Innovation: Conceptualisation of Digital Transformation in Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic Teacher Professional Development and Media Education in a Virtual Learning Environment Predicting Student Employment in Teacher Education Using Machine Learning Algorithms E-learning Issues in Online Marathon Application for Teaching a Foreign Language to Hard of Hearing Students The Connection of the Digital Learning Component with the Development of Preschool and School-age Children: A Review of Research and International Educational Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1