Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Various Classification and Sampling Techniques: A Comparative Study

J. V. V. Sriram Sasank, G. Sahith, K. Abhinav, Meena Belwal
{"title":"Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Various Classification and Sampling Techniques: A Comparative Study","authors":"J. V. V. Sriram Sasank, G. Sahith, K. Abhinav, Meena Belwal","doi":"10.1109/ICCES45898.2019.9002289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With an ascent in the development of web-based business, the utilization of credit cards for internet shopping has expanded significantly. This, in turn, has brought about a great deal of credit card fakes. However, once in a while. Consequently, the execution of effective fraud detection frameworks has turned out to be fundamental for all banks to limit their misfortunes as far as credit card transactions are concerned. Numerous advanced systems have been created to monitor different credit card exchanges in literature. In this way, individuals have been attempting their best to identify the extortion in credit card exchanges as much as they can. Various machine learning techniques have been applied to predict whether a particular transaction is fraudulent or not. The biggest challenge with the techniques is the unavailability of the balanced dataset. Which is due to the nature of the transaction: the fraud transactions are too less when compared to genuine transactions. This work handles the challenge by balancing the dataset. Five machine learning techniques: Random forest, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbor and Logistic regression were applied on the balanced dataset with different sampling techniques such as Oversampling, Undersampling, Both sampling, ROSE and SMOTE. The performance metric AUC – ROC suggests that logistic regression performs with an accuracy of 97.04 % and precision of 99.99%.","PeriodicalId":348347,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES45898.2019.9002289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

With an ascent in the development of web-based business, the utilization of credit cards for internet shopping has expanded significantly. This, in turn, has brought about a great deal of credit card fakes. However, once in a while. Consequently, the execution of effective fraud detection frameworks has turned out to be fundamental for all banks to limit their misfortunes as far as credit card transactions are concerned. Numerous advanced systems have been created to monitor different credit card exchanges in literature. In this way, individuals have been attempting their best to identify the extortion in credit card exchanges as much as they can. Various machine learning techniques have been applied to predict whether a particular transaction is fraudulent or not. The biggest challenge with the techniques is the unavailability of the balanced dataset. Which is due to the nature of the transaction: the fraud transactions are too less when compared to genuine transactions. This work handles the challenge by balancing the dataset. Five machine learning techniques: Random forest, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbor and Logistic regression were applied on the balanced dataset with different sampling techniques such as Oversampling, Undersampling, Both sampling, ROSE and SMOTE. The performance metric AUC – ROC suggests that logistic regression performs with an accuracy of 97.04 % and precision of 99.99%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同分类和抽样技术的信用卡欺诈检测:比较研究
随着网络商务的发展,使用信用卡进行网上购物的人越来越多。这反过来又带来了大量的信用卡伪造。然而,偶尔。因此,就信用卡交易而言,执行有效的欺诈检测框架已被证明是所有银行限制其不幸的基础。许多先进的系统已经被创造出来以监控不同的信用卡交易。通过这种方式,个人尽可能多地试图识别信用卡交易中的勒索行为。各种机器学习技术已经被用于预测特定交易是否具有欺诈性。该技术最大的挑战是平衡数据集的不可用性。这是由于交易的性质:与真实交易相比,欺诈交易太少了。这项工作通过平衡数据集来处理这个挑战。利用随机森林、朴素贝叶斯、支持向量机、k近邻和逻辑回归等五种机器学习技术,采用过采样、欠采样、双采样、ROSE和SMOTE等不同的采样技术对平衡数据集进行学习。性能指标AUC - ROC表明,逻辑回归的准确度为97.04%,精密度为99.99%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated Library System Using Robotic Arm Road Crack Detection and Segmentation for Autonomous Driving Design and Simulation of Two Stage Sample and Hold Circuit with Low Power using Current Controlled Conveyor The PI Controllers and its optimal tuning for Load Frequency Control (LFC) of Hybrid Hydro-thermal Power Systems Low Power Hardware Based Real Time Music System and Digital Data Transmission Using FPGA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1