VISON: An Ontology-Based Approach for Software Visualization Tool Discoverability

Leonel Merino, E. Kozlova, Oscar Nierstrasz, D. Weiskopf
{"title":"VISON: An Ontology-Based Approach for Software Visualization Tool Discoverability","authors":"Leonel Merino, E. Kozlova, Oscar Nierstrasz, D. Weiskopf","doi":"10.1109/VISSOFT.2019.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many tools have been presented in the research literature of software visualization, there is little evidence of their adoption. To choose a suitable visualization tool, practitioners need to analyze various characteristics of tools such as their supported software concerns and level of maturity. Indeed, some tools can be prototypes for which the lifespan is expected to be short, whereas others can be fairly mature products that are maintained for a longer time. Although such characteristics are often described in papers, we conjecture that practitioners willing to adopt software visualizations require additional support to discover suitable visualization tools. In this paper, we elaborate on our efforts to provide such support. To this end, we systematically analyzed research papers in the literature of software visualization and curated a catalog of 70 available tools that employ various visualization techniques to support the analysis of multiple software concerns. We further encapsulate these characteristics in an ontology. VISON, our software visualization ontology, captures these semantics as concepts and relationships. We report on early results of usage scenarios that demonstrate how the ontology can support (i) developers to find suitable tools for particular development concerns, and (ii) researchers who propose new software visualization tools to identify a baseline tool for a controlled experiment.","PeriodicalId":375862,"journal":{"name":"2019 Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOFT.2019.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Although many tools have been presented in the research literature of software visualization, there is little evidence of their adoption. To choose a suitable visualization tool, practitioners need to analyze various characteristics of tools such as their supported software concerns and level of maturity. Indeed, some tools can be prototypes for which the lifespan is expected to be short, whereas others can be fairly mature products that are maintained for a longer time. Although such characteristics are often described in papers, we conjecture that practitioners willing to adopt software visualizations require additional support to discover suitable visualization tools. In this paper, we elaborate on our efforts to provide such support. To this end, we systematically analyzed research papers in the literature of software visualization and curated a catalog of 70 available tools that employ various visualization techniques to support the analysis of multiple software concerns. We further encapsulate these characteristics in an ontology. VISON, our software visualization ontology, captures these semantics as concepts and relationships. We report on early results of usage scenarios that demonstrate how the ontology can support (i) developers to find suitable tools for particular development concerns, and (ii) researchers who propose new software visualization tools to identify a baseline tool for a controlled experiment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于本体的软件可视化工具可发现性方法
尽管在软件可视化的研究文献中提出了许多工具,但很少有证据表明它们被采用。为了选择合适的可视化工具,从业者需要分析工具的各种特征,例如他们所支持的软件关注点和成熟度级别。实际上,有些工具可能是寿命预期较短的原型,而另一些则可能是相当成熟的产品,需要维护较长时间。尽管这样的特征经常在论文中描述,我们推测愿意采用软件可视化的从业者需要额外的支持来发现合适的可视化工具。在本文中,我们详细阐述了我们为提供这种支持所做的努力。为此,我们系统地分析了软件可视化文献中的研究论文,并整理了70个可用工具的目录,这些工具使用各种可视化技术来支持对多个软件关注点的分析。我们进一步将这些特征封装在一个本体中。我们的软件可视化本体,将这些语义捕获为概念和关系。我们报告了使用场景的早期结果,展示了本体如何支持(i)开发人员为特定的开发关注点找到合适的工具,以及(ii)提出新的软件可视化工具的研究人员为受控实验确定基线工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Speak to your Software Visualization—Exploring Component-Based Software Architectures in Augmented Reality with a Conversational Interface Evo-Clocks: Software Evolution at a Glance CloneCompass: Visualizations for Exploring Assembly Code Clone Ecosystems Visually Exploring Software Maintenance Activities Performance Evolution Matrix: Visualizing Performance Variations Along Software Versions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1