Integrating software process assessment models using a process meta model

M. Lepasaar, T. Makinen
{"title":"Integrating software process assessment models using a process meta model","authors":"M. Lepasaar, T. Makinen","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software process improvement (SPI) is motivated by the need to increase the quality and productivity of software work. It is a widely accepted fact that the quality of the software product is largely determined by the quality of the process used to develop and maintain it. SPI requires knowledge of what is needed, awareness of what is feasible, and a long-term commitment to its investment. Software process assessment helps software organizations improve themselves by identifying their critical problems and establishing improvement priorities. The assessment takes place by comparing the state of the organization's software process against the model and the improvement scale. An assessment is usually based on a software process model and an improvement roadmap. The interest in software process improvement has created dozens of international software process models and standards. CMMI and SPICE are two most widely used process assessment models in the SPI work today. In order to help software companies, a SPI support tool is currently being developed. The SPI support tool guides the users through software process improvement, diminishing the need for continuous external consultations and assessors. Software process models form the central part of this support tool. In order to implement various process models into the support tool, the structure of the models should be analyzed and integrated into one common meta model. We have previously conducted conceptual analyses of SPICE and CMMI where the structure of both models has been studied. In this paper we describe the result of the conceptual synthesis of these process models-integration of SPICE and CMMI through a meta model. The integrated meta model contributes to a more complete process assessment, since it includes elements of various process models.","PeriodicalId":355841,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Software process improvement (SPI) is motivated by the need to increase the quality and productivity of software work. It is a widely accepted fact that the quality of the software product is largely determined by the quality of the process used to develop and maintain it. SPI requires knowledge of what is needed, awareness of what is feasible, and a long-term commitment to its investment. Software process assessment helps software organizations improve themselves by identifying their critical problems and establishing improvement priorities. The assessment takes place by comparing the state of the organization's software process against the model and the improvement scale. An assessment is usually based on a software process model and an improvement roadmap. The interest in software process improvement has created dozens of international software process models and standards. CMMI and SPICE are two most widely used process assessment models in the SPI work today. In order to help software companies, a SPI support tool is currently being developed. The SPI support tool guides the users through software process improvement, diminishing the need for continuous external consultations and assessors. Software process models form the central part of this support tool. In order to implement various process models into the support tool, the structure of the models should be analyzed and integrated into one common meta model. We have previously conducted conceptual analyses of SPICE and CMMI where the structure of both models has been studied. In this paper we describe the result of the conceptual synthesis of these process models-integration of SPICE and CMMI through a meta model. The integrated meta model contributes to a more complete process assessment, since it includes elements of various process models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用过程元模型集成软件过程评估模型
软件过程改进(SPI)的动机是需要提高软件工作的质量和生产力。软件产品的质量在很大程度上取决于用于开发和维护它的过程的质量,这是一个被广泛接受的事实。SPI需要了解需要什么,了解什么是可行的,并对其投资作出长期承诺。软件过程评估帮助软件组织通过识别关键问题和建立改进优先级来改进自己。通过将组织的软件过程的状态与模型和改进规模进行比较来进行评估。评估通常基于软件过程模型和改进路线图。对软件过程改进的兴趣已经创建了许多国际软件过程模型和标准。CMMI和SPICE是目前SPI工作中使用最广泛的两个过程评估模型。为了帮助软件公司,目前正在开发一个SPI支持工具。SPI支持工具通过软件过程改进指导用户,减少了对持续外部咨询和评估人员的需求。软件过程模型构成了这个支持工具的中心部分。为了在支持工具中实现各种流程模型,应该分析模型的结构并将其集成到一个公共元模型中。我们之前对SPICE和CMMI进行了概念分析,研究了这两个模型的结构。本文描述了这些过程模型的概念综合结果——通过元模型将SPICE和CMMI集成。集成的元模型有助于更完整的过程评估,因为它包含了各种过程模型的元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Business management models for high technological small to medium enterprises (SMEs), incorporating the close relations of subdivisions within the company, and aspects of volatile economic climates Application of R&D portfolio analysis at a De Beers business unit Mass customization: four approaches to deliver customized products and services with mass production efficiency Developing integrated circuits for an efficient electronic commerce in the semiconductor industry New product development as a complex system of decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1