Corporate social responsibility committees and the use of corporate social responsibility assurance services

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcae.2022.100317
Michael Bradbury, Jing Jia, Zhongtian Li
{"title":"Corporate social responsibility committees and the use of corporate social responsibility assurance services","authors":"Michael Bradbury,&nbsp;Jing Jia,&nbsp;Zhongtian Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2022.100317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines whether corporate social responsibility<span> (CSR) committees associate with the external assurance of CSR reports. Specifically, we consider the presence and effectiveness of CSR committees. Using a sample of Australian firms over the period 2004–2016, we show the mere presence of a CSR committee is not related to the external assurance of CSR. However, CSR committee effectiveness is positively related. In addition, firms with higher CSR committee effectiveness are more likely to seek external assurance provided by the Big4 accountancy firms and acquire financial audit and CSR assurance services from the same provider. Taken together, CSR committee effectiveness plays an active role in CSR assurance services. Our results are particularly relevant to those with interests in understanding the demand and choice of external CSR assurance services, as well as the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on these services.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 100317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566922000121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examines whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) committees associate with the external assurance of CSR reports. Specifically, we consider the presence and effectiveness of CSR committees. Using a sample of Australian firms over the period 2004–2016, we show the mere presence of a CSR committee is not related to the external assurance of CSR. However, CSR committee effectiveness is positively related. In addition, firms with higher CSR committee effectiveness are more likely to seek external assurance provided by the Big4 accountancy firms and acquire financial audit and CSR assurance services from the same provider. Taken together, CSR committee effectiveness plays an active role in CSR assurance services. Our results are particularly relevant to those with interests in understanding the demand and choice of external CSR assurance services, as well as the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on these services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社会责任委员会和使用企业社会责任保证服务
本研究探讨企业社会责任委员会是否与企业社会责任报告的外部保证相关联。具体而言,我们考虑企业社会责任委员会的存在和有效性。我们以2004-2016年期间的澳大利亚公司为样本,表明企业社会责任委员会的存在与企业社会责任的外部保证无关。然而,企业社会责任委员会的有效性是正相关的。此外,企业社会责任委员会效率越高的事务所更有可能寻求由四大会计师事务所提供的外部保证,并从同一家会计师事务所获得财务审计和企业社会责任保证服务。综上所述,企业社会责任委员会的有效性在企业社会责任保证服务中起着积极的作用。我们的研究结果与那些有兴趣了解外部企业社会责任保证服务的需求和选择,以及公司治理机制对这些服务的影响的人特别相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Expanded auditor’s reports and voluntary disclosure Long-term tax strategy and corporate acquisition payment structure: An analysis based on the book-tax tradeoff theory Dividend signalling and investor protection: An international comparison MD&A tone and stock returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1