Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ceftazidime+avibactam (Zavicefta®) in the treatment of sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria

S. Nedogoda, A. Salasyuk, I. Barykina, V. O. Smirnova
{"title":"Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ceftazidime+avibactam (Zavicefta®) in the treatment of sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria","authors":"S. Nedogoda, A. Salasyuk, I. Barykina, V. O. Smirnova","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909.2019.12.2.72-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to assess the economic outcomes of using ceftazidime + avibactam (compared with the recommended treatments) in adult patients with sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria. Methods. The economic assessment was made using the cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis. The cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses were performed using the Microsoft Excel software. Results. The treatment efficacy analysis showed that patients treated with the fixed-dose combination ceftazidime + avibactam had fewer days spent in the ICU and higher clinical cure rates than patients receiving the reference drug combinations (8 vs 18 days and 75% vs 34.8%, respectively, p=0.031). The cost of treatment with ceftazidime + avibactam amounted to 228.3 thousand rubles, which was lower than the cost of using the alternative treatment regimens by 34.5-229.5 thousand rubles or 13.12-50.14%. According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, the use of ceftazidime + avibactam is pharmacoeconomically effective as it reduces the cost of patient clinical cure case by 61-72% (depending on the treatment regimen used); in addition, the ceftazidime + avibactam allows for managing the hospitalized patient at a cost lower by 76270 thousand rubles or 16-40% than the compared treatment. The median economic benefit from using the fixed dose combination ceftazidime + avibactam is 154 thousand rubles (28% savings compared with the current practice). The budget impact analysis showed that the reduction in the health budget burden would reach 29% or 34.3 million rubles in year. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the above results. Conclusion. Based on the obtained results, we conclude that the ceftazidime + avibactam combination in patients with sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria is economically preferable as compared with the current antibiotic therapy regimens.","PeriodicalId":201824,"journal":{"name":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2019.12.2.72-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: to assess the economic outcomes of using ceftazidime + avibactam (compared with the recommended treatments) in adult patients with sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria. Methods. The economic assessment was made using the cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis. The cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses were performed using the Microsoft Excel software. Results. The treatment efficacy analysis showed that patients treated with the fixed-dose combination ceftazidime + avibactam had fewer days spent in the ICU and higher clinical cure rates than patients receiving the reference drug combinations (8 vs 18 days and 75% vs 34.8%, respectively, p=0.031). The cost of treatment with ceftazidime + avibactam amounted to 228.3 thousand rubles, which was lower than the cost of using the alternative treatment regimens by 34.5-229.5 thousand rubles or 13.12-50.14%. According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, the use of ceftazidime + avibactam is pharmacoeconomically effective as it reduces the cost of patient clinical cure case by 61-72% (depending on the treatment regimen used); in addition, the ceftazidime + avibactam allows for managing the hospitalized patient at a cost lower by 76270 thousand rubles or 16-40% than the compared treatment. The median economic benefit from using the fixed dose combination ceftazidime + avibactam is 154 thousand rubles (28% savings compared with the current practice). The budget impact analysis showed that the reduction in the health budget burden would reach 29% or 34.3 million rubles in year. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the above results. Conclusion. Based on the obtained results, we conclude that the ceftazidime + avibactam combination in patients with sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria is economically preferable as compared with the current antibiotic therapy regimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢他啶+阿维巴坦(Zavicefta®)治疗碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌所致脓毒症的药物经济学分析
目的:评价头孢他啶+阿维巴坦治疗碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌所致脓毒症的经济效果(与推荐治疗方法比较)。方法。采用成本效益分析和预算影响分析进行了经济评价。使用Microsoft Excel软件进行成本效益和预算影响分析。结果。疗效分析显示,头孢他啶+阿维巴坦固定剂量联合治疗患者ICU天数少于对照药物联合治疗患者(8天vs 18天,75% vs 34.8%, p=0.031),临床治愈率较高。使用头孢他啶+阿维巴坦治疗的费用为22.83万卢布,比使用替代治疗方案的费用低34.5- 22.95万卢布或13.12-50.14%。根据成本-效果分析,头孢他啶+阿维巴坦使用具有药物经济效益,可使患者临床治愈病例的成本降低61-72%(取决于所使用的治疗方案);此外,头孢他啶+阿维巴坦治疗住院病人的费用比同类治疗低7627万卢布或16-40%。使用固定剂量头孢他啶+阿维巴坦组合的经济效益中位数为15.4万卢布(与目前的做法相比节省28%)。预算影响分析表明,卫生预算负担将减少29%,即每年减少3 430万卢布。敏感性分析证实了上述结果。结论。基于所获得的结果,我们得出结论,与目前的抗生素治疗方案相比,头孢他啶+阿维巴坦联合治疗碳青霉烯耐药菌引起的脓毒症在经济上更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chemoreactome screening of pharmaceutical effects on SARS-CoV-2 and human virome to help decide on drug-based COVID-19 therapy Impact of disease information (Ebola and COVID-19) on the pharmaceutical sector in Russia and USA Analysis of the availability and affordability of pharmaceuticals for children in need of palliative care Comparative effectiveness of simultaneous and staged operations in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of carotid and coronary arteries Systematic computer analysis of published literature on nutritional support for vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1