Attitudes of general practitioners and their patients about ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in family medicine

M. Petek Šter, J. Kersnik
{"title":"Attitudes of general practitioners and their patients about ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in family medicine","authors":"M. Petek Šter, J. Kersnik","doi":"10.18690/actabiomed.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is increasingly being used in general practice, but there is a lack of information about the attitudes of general practitioners and their patients about the use of ABPM in primary care in Europe.Methods: Cross sectional survey performed on consecutive patients with uncontrolled hypertension treated by at least two different antihypertensive drugs and referred for ABPM in 38 general practices in Slovenia. Patients and physicians completed a questionnaire about their satisfaction with, attitudes about and acceptance of ABPM in general practice; the latter two were assessed using 5 point Likert scales.Results: We obtained complete data for 185 patients; 95 female (51.4 %) and 90 (48.6%) male, aged 37 to 79 years (mean 59.5, SD 9.5 years). 106 (67.3 %) patients were completely satisfied with the instructions given before ABPM. Patients found ABPM an acceptable method of blood pressure control. They believed that ABMP helped to reach better bloodpressure control (Likert scale: 4.46, SD 1.03) and valued having access to ABPM in general practice (Likert scale: 4.65, SD 1.01). General practitioners strongly believed that ABPM wasacceptable to patients, improved patient and physician interest in blood pressure control, improved compliance with treatment and reduced prescription of antihypertensive drugs. They recognised ABPM as being most valuable in cases of patients with suspected white-coat hypertension (Likert scale: 4.79, SD 0.49).Conclusions: Patients and general practitioners find ABPM to be an acceptable method for investigating blood pressure. Patients value being able to access ABPM in general practice rather than in a specialist setting.","PeriodicalId":186880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is increasingly being used in general practice, but there is a lack of information about the attitudes of general practitioners and their patients about the use of ABPM in primary care in Europe.Methods: Cross sectional survey performed on consecutive patients with uncontrolled hypertension treated by at least two different antihypertensive drugs and referred for ABPM in 38 general practices in Slovenia. Patients and physicians completed a questionnaire about their satisfaction with, attitudes about and acceptance of ABPM in general practice; the latter two were assessed using 5 point Likert scales.Results: We obtained complete data for 185 patients; 95 female (51.4 %) and 90 (48.6%) male, aged 37 to 79 years (mean 59.5, SD 9.5 years). 106 (67.3 %) patients were completely satisfied with the instructions given before ABPM. Patients found ABPM an acceptable method of blood pressure control. They believed that ABMP helped to reach better bloodpressure control (Likert scale: 4.46, SD 1.03) and valued having access to ABPM in general practice (Likert scale: 4.65, SD 1.01). General practitioners strongly believed that ABPM wasacceptable to patients, improved patient and physician interest in blood pressure control, improved compliance with treatment and reduced prescription of antihypertensive drugs. They recognised ABPM as being most valuable in cases of patients with suspected white-coat hypertension (Likert scale: 4.79, SD 0.49).Conclusions: Patients and general practitioners find ABPM to be an acceptable method for investigating blood pressure. Patients value being able to access ABPM in general practice rather than in a specialist setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生及患者对家庭医学动态血压监测的态度
目的:动态血压监测(ABPM)越来越多地在全科医生中使用,但缺乏关于全科医生及其患者在欧洲初级保健中使用ABPM的态度的信息。方法:对斯洛文尼亚38家全科医院接受至少两种不同降压药治疗并转诊为ABPM的连续高血压患者进行横断面调查。患者和医生填写了一份关于全科实践中ABPM的满意度、态度和接受度的问卷;后两者采用5点李克特量表进行评估。结果:185例患者获得完整资料;女性95例(51.4%),男性90例(48.6%),年龄37 ~ 79岁(平均59.5岁,SD 9.5岁)。106例(67.3%)患者对ABPM前的指导完全满意。患者发现ABPM是一种可接受的血压控制方法。他们认为ABMP有助于达到更好的血压控制(Likert量表:4.46,SD 1.03),并重视在一般实践中使用ABPM (Likert量表:4.65,SD 1.01)。全科医生坚信患者可以接受ABPM,提高了患者和医生对血压控制的兴趣,提高了治疗依从性,减少了抗高血压药物的处方。他们认为ABPM在疑似白大衣高血压患者中最有价值(李克特量表:4.79,标准差0.49)。结论:患者和全科医生认为ABPM是一种可接受的血压检测方法。患者希望能够在一般实践中获得ABPM,而不是在专业环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Razvoj znanstvenoraziskovalnega dela študentov MF UM v zadnji 20 letih / The development of the scientific research work of MF UM students in the last 20 years Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: Effect on oncological outcomes Transient Neonatal Myasthenia Gravis: Case Report Polyneuritis cranialis related to SARS-CoV-2 infection: a case report Alpha Cell Stimulus-Secretion Coupling and Intercellular Interactions in Health and Type 2 Diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1