Scheuermann’s disease surgery. Major problems: non-systematic literature review (part I).

M. Mikhaylovskiy, V. Lukinov
{"title":"Scheuermann’s disease surgery. Major problems: non-systematic literature review (part I).","authors":"M. Mikhaylovskiy, V. Lukinov","doi":"10.14531/ss2021.3.6-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To perform multivariate comparison of two surgical strategies in the treatment of patients with severe Scheuermann’s disease.Material and Methods. The search of sources (in Scopus and Web of Science databases) revealed  56 publications containing the required information. The literature data were analyzed in four directions: the results of one- and two-stage interventions are compared in terms of the magnitude of achieved correction and its preservation, the complication rate, the surgery duration and the volume of intraoperative blood loss, and the quality of life of patients in the postoperative period.Results. The magnitude of the achieved correction of kyphotic deformity and postoperative loss of correction in patients after one- and two-stage operations are almost identical. Implant-associated complications are more often observed after one-stage operations, and purulent, neurological and other complications – after two-stage operations. Surgery duration and intraoperative blood loss volume are greater in two-stage operations. The quality of life assessed by various questionnaires is significantly improved, regardless of the type of surgery.Conclusion. Two-stage surgical correction of Scheuermann’s kyphosis has no noticeable advantages over one-stage surgery, however, new studies with long (more than 15–18 years) postoperative follow-up are needed.","PeriodicalId":337711,"journal":{"name":"Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2021.3.6-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To perform multivariate comparison of two surgical strategies in the treatment of patients with severe Scheuermann’s disease.Material and Methods. The search of sources (in Scopus and Web of Science databases) revealed  56 publications containing the required information. The literature data were analyzed in four directions: the results of one- and two-stage interventions are compared in terms of the magnitude of achieved correction and its preservation, the complication rate, the surgery duration and the volume of intraoperative blood loss, and the quality of life of patients in the postoperative period.Results. The magnitude of the achieved correction of kyphotic deformity and postoperative loss of correction in patients after one- and two-stage operations are almost identical. Implant-associated complications are more often observed after one-stage operations, and purulent, neurological and other complications – after two-stage operations. Surgery duration and intraoperative blood loss volume are greater in two-stage operations. The quality of life assessed by various questionnaires is significantly improved, regardless of the type of surgery.Conclusion. Two-stage surgical correction of Scheuermann’s kyphosis has no noticeable advantages over one-stage surgery, however, new studies with long (more than 15–18 years) postoperative follow-up are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舒尔曼氏病手术。主要问题:非系统文献综述(第一部分)。
目标。目的:比较两种手术方式治疗严重舒曼氏病的疗效。材料和方法。来源搜索(在Scopus和Web of Science数据库中)显示了56篇包含所需信息的出版物。对文献资料进行四个方面的分析:比较一期和二期干预的结果,包括完成的矫正程度和保存程度、并发症发生率、手术时间和术中出血量、术后患者的生活质量。一期和二期手术患者后凸畸形的矫正程度和术后矫正损失几乎相同。一期手术后更常观察到种植体相关并发症,两期手术后更常观察到化脓性、神经性和其他并发症。两阶段手术的手术时间和术中出血量较大。不论手术类型如何,通过各种问卷评估的生活质量均有显著改善。两期手术矫正Scheuermann后凸与一期手术相比没有明显的优势,但需要进行术后长时间(超过15-18年)随访的新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of surgical methods for the treatment of grade I and II spondylolisthesis of the L5 vertebra Clinical features of infectious spondylitis in patients with COVID-19 Symptomatic arachnoiditis ossificans associated with syringomyelia: a clinical case and a brief literature review Polysegmental and multilevel lesions in hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis: assessment of immediate and long-term results The use of transforaminal epidural block in patients with herniated discs and radicular pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1