Our Experience with Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Clinical Stage T3 Prostate Cancer and Its Possible Advantages

I. Kartal, O. Alkış, Mehmet Sevim, O. Sönmez, Serkan Telli, B. Aras
{"title":"Our Experience with Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Clinical Stage T3 Prostate Cancer and Its Possible Advantages","authors":"I. Kartal, O. Alkış, Mehmet Sevim, O. Sönmez, Serkan Telli, B. Aras","doi":"10.5505/gju.2022.02986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our experience with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of clinical T3 and its possible advantages. Abstract Objective: To evaluate the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (EPLND) on the disease process in terms of oncological outcomes and quality of life in the treatment of clinical stage cT3N0M0 prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: The data of patients with cT3N0M0 who had undergone open radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in our clinic between January 2015 and March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared in terms of oncological and functional outcomes. Biochemical recurrence was accepted as detection of PSA >0.2 ng/ml on consecutive measurements and biochemical disease-free survival time was calculated. Results: The mean age of 23 operated patients who met the study criteria, was 66.8±7.4 years. In the pathological staging, the organ-confined disease was detected in 10 (43.4%) patients. Surgical margin positivity was observed in 6 (26.2%), while lymph node positivity in 3 (13.1%) patients. Biochemical recurrence was detected in 7 (30.2%) patients during a mean follow-up period of 33.6±22.9 months. The mean biochemical disease-free survival time was 48.4±6.3 months. In the evaluations of the patients at the postoperative 6 th months, a 3.2±2.2-point decrease was found in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (p=0.001) and a 13.1±5.0 point decrease in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score (p=<0.001). Conclusion: Radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection applied in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer is seem to be an effective and safe treatment method in terms of oncological and functional outcomes.","PeriodicalId":266572,"journal":{"name":"GRAND JOURNAL OF UROLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GRAND JOURNAL OF UROLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/gju.2022.02986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our experience with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of clinical T3 and its possible advantages. Abstract Objective: To evaluate the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (EPLND) on the disease process in terms of oncological outcomes and quality of life in the treatment of clinical stage cT3N0M0 prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: The data of patients with cT3N0M0 who had undergone open radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in our clinic between January 2015 and March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared in terms of oncological and functional outcomes. Biochemical recurrence was accepted as detection of PSA >0.2 ng/ml on consecutive measurements and biochemical disease-free survival time was calculated. Results: The mean age of 23 operated patients who met the study criteria, was 66.8±7.4 years. In the pathological staging, the organ-confined disease was detected in 10 (43.4%) patients. Surgical margin positivity was observed in 6 (26.2%), while lymph node positivity in 3 (13.1%) patients. Biochemical recurrence was detected in 7 (30.2%) patients during a mean follow-up period of 33.6±22.9 months. The mean biochemical disease-free survival time was 48.4±6.3 months. In the evaluations of the patients at the postoperative 6 th months, a 3.2±2.2-point decrease was found in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (p=0.001) and a 13.1±5.0 point decrease in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score (p=<0.001). Conclusion: Radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection applied in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer is seem to be an effective and safe treatment method in terms of oncological and functional outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性前列腺切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗临床T3期前列腺癌的经验及其可能的优势
我们在根治性前列腺切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗临床T3的经验及其可能的优势。摘要目的:探讨根治性前列腺切除术(RP)联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术(EPLND)对临床分期cT3N0M0期前列腺癌(PCa)患者肿瘤预后及生活质量的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院2015年1月至2021年3月行开放性根治性前列腺切除术及扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的cT3N0M0患者资料。术前和术后的数据比较肿瘤和功能结果。连续测定PSA >0.2 ng/ml为生化复发,计算生化无病生存时间。结果:23例符合研究标准的手术患者平均年龄为66.8±7.4岁。病理分期中,器官局限性病变10例(43.4%)。手术缘阳性6例(26.2%),淋巴结阳性3例(13.1%)。7例(30.2%)患者在平均33.6±22.9个月的随访中出现生化复发。平均生化无病生存时间为48.4±6.3个月。术后6个月对患者的评价中,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)下降3.2±2.2分(p=0.001),国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)评分下降13.1±5.0分(p=<0.001)。结论:根治性前列腺切除术联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗局部晚期前列腺癌是一种安全有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Absolute White Blood Cell Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio May Predict the Need for Double- J Stent Insertion in Ureteral Stones in Children: A Comparative Study The Effect of Curcumin on Penile Fibrotic Plaque in Rats with Experimental Peyronie’s Disease Management of Non-Deflating Foley Catheter Balloons in Emergency and Urology Clinics: A 5-Year Retrospective Study Comparison of Fixed and Ramping Voltage Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy with Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers: Prospective Randomized Clinical Study Comparison of Intrarenal Retrograde Surgery Results Between Different Age Groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1