Foreigners and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings

Anzor Saadulaev
{"title":"Foreigners and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings","authors":"Anzor Saadulaev","doi":"10.31548/law2021.04.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to appeal to a court, including an administrative one, is one of the key rights of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. Apart from the general constitutional right to judicial protection, Article 7 of the Law of Ukraine No. 1402-VIII “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” dated June 2, 2016, guarantees everyone the protection of their rights, freedoms, and interests within a reasonable time by an independent, impartial, and fair court established by law. Considering the relevance of this study, its purpose was to establish the main reasons for improper recognition of the legal status of all participants in administrative proceedings at the legislative level. The study used a set of methods and techniques of scientific cognition. The principal ones are as follows: the dialectical method, which determines the essence and content of the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals; the comparative legal method, with the application of which the Ukrainian and foreign regulatory framework governing the status of foreign citizens and stateless individuals were compared; the formal legal method, which, together the method of logical analysis, allowed comprehensively investigating the modern system of legal norms that establish administrative procedural legal personality and the procedure for citizens and subjects of authority to exercise their rights and duties in an administrative court; the logical-semantic method allowed developing proposals for improving the legislation of Ukraine in the field of administrative proceedings. It was stated that access to justice for every person is ensured according to the Constitution of Ukraine and according to the procedure established by the laws of Ukraine. However, along with the guaranteed right to appeal to the court of foreigners, stateless individuals (refugees, migrants, immigrants), such a category of subjects of administrative proceedings as stateless individuals stayed outside the limits of Ukrainian legislation. The paper considered the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings. To eliminate the shortcomings of the legislative regulation of the legal status of stateless individuals in Ukraine, the author concluded that it is necessary to eliminate the existing deficiency by amending the Law of Ukraine No. 3773-V “On the Legal Status of Foreigners and Stateless Individuals” dated September 22, 2011. The practical value of the obtained results is that the theoretical propositions, conclusions, and proposals formulated in the article can be used: in the research field (for further developments aimed at investigating the issues of administrative justice in Ukraine), in the law-making field (to improve the current legislation of Ukraine), in the field of law enforcement (to improve the activities of administrative courts, state executive authorities, local self-government bodies), in the field related to ensuring the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.04.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The right to appeal to a court, including an administrative one, is one of the key rights of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. Apart from the general constitutional right to judicial protection, Article 7 of the Law of Ukraine No. 1402-VIII “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” dated June 2, 2016, guarantees everyone the protection of their rights, freedoms, and interests within a reasonable time by an independent, impartial, and fair court established by law. Considering the relevance of this study, its purpose was to establish the main reasons for improper recognition of the legal status of all participants in administrative proceedings at the legislative level. The study used a set of methods and techniques of scientific cognition. The principal ones are as follows: the dialectical method, which determines the essence and content of the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals; the comparative legal method, with the application of which the Ukrainian and foreign regulatory framework governing the status of foreign citizens and stateless individuals were compared; the formal legal method, which, together the method of logical analysis, allowed comprehensively investigating the modern system of legal norms that establish administrative procedural legal personality and the procedure for citizens and subjects of authority to exercise their rights and duties in an administrative court; the logical-semantic method allowed developing proposals for improving the legislation of Ukraine in the field of administrative proceedings. It was stated that access to justice for every person is ensured according to the Constitution of Ukraine and according to the procedure established by the laws of Ukraine. However, along with the guaranteed right to appeal to the court of foreigners, stateless individuals (refugees, migrants, immigrants), such a category of subjects of administrative proceedings as stateless individuals stayed outside the limits of Ukrainian legislation. The paper considered the administrative legal status of Ukrainian citizens, foreign citizens, and stateless individuals as subjects of administrative proceedings. To eliminate the shortcomings of the legislative regulation of the legal status of stateless individuals in Ukraine, the author concluded that it is necessary to eliminate the existing deficiency by amending the Law of Ukraine No. 3773-V “On the Legal Status of Foreigners and Stateless Individuals” dated September 22, 2011. The practical value of the obtained results is that the theoretical propositions, conclusions, and proposals formulated in the article can be used: in the research field (for further developments aimed at investigating the issues of administrative justice in Ukraine), in the law-making field (to improve the current legislation of Ukraine), in the field of law enforcement (to improve the activities of administrative courts, state executive authorities, local self-government bodies), in the field related to ensuring the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为行政诉讼对象的外国人和无国籍个人
向法院(包括行政法院)上诉的权利是乌克兰宪法和法律保障的公民的主要权利之一。除了获得司法保护的一般宪法权利外,2016年6月2日乌克兰第1402-VIII号法律“关于司法和法官地位”第7条保障每个人在合理时间内由依法设立的独立,公正和公平的法院保护其权利,自由和利益。考虑到这项研究的相关性,其目的是确定立法一级不适当承认行政诉讼中所有参与人的法律地位的主要原因。本研究采用了一套科学认知的方法和技术。主要有:辨证法,确定乌克兰公民、外国公民和无国籍个人行政法律地位的实质和内容;比较法律方法,对乌克兰和外国关于外国公民和无国籍个人地位的管理框架的适用情况进行了比较;形式法方法与逻辑分析方法相结合,全面考察了确立行政程序法律人格的现代法律规范体系以及公民和权力主体在行政法院行使权利和义务的程序;逻辑-语义方法可以为改进乌克兰在行政诉讼领域的立法提出建议。有人指出,根据《乌克兰宪法》和乌克兰法律规定的程序,确保每个人都有诉诸司法的机会。但是,除了保证向外国人、无国籍个人(难民、移民、移民)法院提出上诉的权利外,诸如无国籍个人这一类的行政诉讼对象仍然不在乌克兰立法的范围之内。该文件考虑了乌克兰公民、外国公民和无国籍个人作为行政诉讼主体的行政法律地位。为了消除乌克兰无国籍个人法律地位立法规定的不足,笔者认为有必要通过修改2011年9月22日乌克兰第3773-V号法“关于外国人和无国籍个人的法律地位”来消除现有的不足。所得结果的实用价值在于本文提出的理论命题、结论和建议可以应用:在研究领域(为进一步发展旨在调查乌克兰行政司法问题),在立法领域(改善乌克兰现行立法),在执法领域(改善行政法院,国家行政机关,地方自治机构的活动),在与确保个人和法人实体的权利,自由和合法利益有关的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative liability of juveniles for smoking Epistemological construction doctrine of the veterinary care defect phenomenon in forensic veterinary examination International experience in the use of alternative energy sources (within the European Union) Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights The role of collective-contractual regulation in ensuring the right of agricultural workers to a safe and healthy working environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1