Library and Information Science Curriculum in a Changing Professional Landscape: The Case of Copyright Education in the United States

D. Kawooya, Donna L. Ferullo, T. Lipinski
{"title":"Library and Information Science Curriculum in a Changing Professional Landscape: The Case of Copyright Education in the United States","authors":"D. Kawooya, Donna L. Ferullo, T. Lipinski","doi":"10.17161/JCEL.V3I2.6974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the importance placed on copyright and intellectual property literacy by the American Library Association, as evidenced in the accreditation standards, issues pertaining to copyright education remain marginal in the library and information science (LIS) curriculum and research. Today, copyright intersects with every library and information service in any type of information institution, yet few librarians get copyright training as part of the formal LIS curriculum in library schools. Lack of copyright education leaves many librarians unable to properly identify and address copyright issues in the workplace. This paper offers a critical analysis of LIS programs over the past 10–12 years with a specific focus on trends in the teaching of copyright matters. Employing a qualitative methodology with a mixed-method approach, the authors analyzed the syllabi of courses dedicated to copyright and intellectual property offered at select LIS programs. The goal was to understand what the copyright courses cover, how they are taught, instructional sources and resources, and curriculum changes over time, where applicable. Findings show that the few LIS programs offering copyright courses have rigorous and dynamic copyright curriculum that constantly changes with the evolving copyright environment. The main takeaway and recommendation is that some kind of coordination is needed in the teaching of copyright and that LIS programs may need minimum standards for the core curriculum of copyright courses. The coordinating mechanism will ensure that periodic review of the core curriculum occurs and takes into account the rapid changes in the different library environments where library students work.","PeriodicalId":354781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/JCEL.V3I2.6974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Despite the importance placed on copyright and intellectual property literacy by the American Library Association, as evidenced in the accreditation standards, issues pertaining to copyright education remain marginal in the library and information science (LIS) curriculum and research. Today, copyright intersects with every library and information service in any type of information institution, yet few librarians get copyright training as part of the formal LIS curriculum in library schools. Lack of copyright education leaves many librarians unable to properly identify and address copyright issues in the workplace. This paper offers a critical analysis of LIS programs over the past 10–12 years with a specific focus on trends in the teaching of copyright matters. Employing a qualitative methodology with a mixed-method approach, the authors analyzed the syllabi of courses dedicated to copyright and intellectual property offered at select LIS programs. The goal was to understand what the copyright courses cover, how they are taught, instructional sources and resources, and curriculum changes over time, where applicable. Findings show that the few LIS programs offering copyright courses have rigorous and dynamic copyright curriculum that constantly changes with the evolving copyright environment. The main takeaway and recommendation is that some kind of coordination is needed in the teaching of copyright and that LIS programs may need minimum standards for the core curriculum of copyright courses. The coordinating mechanism will ensure that periodic review of the core curriculum occurs and takes into account the rapid changes in the different library environments where library students work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业环境变化中的图书馆情报学课程:以美国版权教育为例
尽管美国图书馆协会重视版权和知识产权素养,正如认证标准所证明的那样,与版权教育有关的问题在图书馆和信息科学(LIS)课程和研究中仍然处于边缘地位。今天,版权与任何类型的信息机构的每一个图书馆和信息服务都有交集,但很少有图书馆员在图书馆学校的正式课程中接受版权培训。缺乏版权教育使许多图书馆员无法正确识别和解决工作场所的版权问题。本文对过去10-12年的LIS课程进行了批判性分析,特别关注版权问题教学的趋势。采用混合方法的定性方法,作者分析了在选定的LIS项目提供的版权和知识产权课程的教学大纲。目标是了解版权课程涵盖的内容,如何教学,教学来源和资源,以及课程随时间的变化,如果适用的话。调查结果表明,少数提供版权课程的美国大学课程具有严格和动态的版权课程,随着版权环境的变化而不断变化。主要的收获和建议是,在版权教学中需要某种协调,并且LIS项目可能需要版权课程核心课程的最低标准。协调机制将确保对核心课程进行定期审查,并考虑到图书馆学生工作的不同图书馆环境的快速变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Controlled Digital Lending of Video Resources: Ensuring the Provision of Streaming Access to Videos for Pedagogical Purposes in Academic Libraries Book Review: Helping Library Users with Legal Questions: Practical Advice for Research, Programming, and Outreach Copyright in the Time of COVID-19: An Australian Perspective Introducing the Copyright Anxiety Scale Book Review: Copyright for Schools: A Practical Guide, 6th Edition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1