Navigating uncertainty: an examination of how people with haemophilia understand and cope with uncertainty in protection in an ethnographic study

T. Hughes, Mikkel Brok-Kristensen, Yosha Gargeya, Anne Mette Worsøe Lottrup, Ask Bo Larsen, A. Torres-Ortuño, N. Mackett, J. Stevens
{"title":"Navigating uncertainty: an examination of how people with haemophilia understand and cope with uncertainty in protection in an ethnographic study","authors":"T. Hughes, Mikkel Brok-Kristensen, Yosha Gargeya, Anne Mette Worsøe Lottrup, Ask Bo Larsen, A. Torres-Ortuño, N. Mackett, J. Stevens","doi":"10.17225/jhp00168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background With the major advances in treatment of haemophilia in recent decades, people with haemophilia (PwH) are more protected in their daily lives than ever before. However, recent studies point to persisting or increasing patient experience of uncertainty. Aims The aim of this article is to further investigate findings related to how PwH understand and cope with uncertainty around their protection in their everyday life, one of the main themes identified in a large-scale ethnographic study of the everyday life of PwH, including beliefs and experiences related to their condition, their treatment, and their personal ways of managing the condition. Methods The study used ethnographic research methods. Five haemophilia experts provided historical and disease area context prior to the initiation of field research. During field research, study researchers collected data through 8–12 hours of participant observation, semi-structured interviews, written exercises, facilitated group dialogues, and on-site observations of the interactions of PwH with friends, family, and health care professionals (HCPs). Study researchers also conducted on-site observation at haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) and interviewed HCPs. The study employed a multi-tiered grounded theory approach and combined data were analysed using techniques such as inductive and deductive analysis, cross-case analysis, challenge mapping, and clustering exercises. This article explores findings related to uncertainty and thus focuses on a subset of the data from the study. Results Fifty-one PwH in Italy, Germany, Spain, UK, and Ireland were interviewed and followed in their daily lives, and 18 HCPs were interviewed. Fifty-two per cent (n=26/50) of PwH in the study experience difficulties translating clinical understanding of protection into specific activities in everyday life. Many have developed their own mental models and care adaptations to navigate treatment uncertainy: these seldom match the medical community's view. These mental models of protection among PwH can cause distress and influence behaviour in a way that can limit possibilities, and/or increase risk. There is also a prevalent tension in the strategies PwH have for managing their protection in terms of day-to-day vs. long-term ambitions. Conclusions These findings on PwH's experience of treatment uncertainty suggest a need to develop tools and communication materials to help PwH better understand the protection provided by their treatment regimen and what that means practically for everyday life.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Background With the major advances in treatment of haemophilia in recent decades, people with haemophilia (PwH) are more protected in their daily lives than ever before. However, recent studies point to persisting or increasing patient experience of uncertainty. Aims The aim of this article is to further investigate findings related to how PwH understand and cope with uncertainty around their protection in their everyday life, one of the main themes identified in a large-scale ethnographic study of the everyday life of PwH, including beliefs and experiences related to their condition, their treatment, and their personal ways of managing the condition. Methods The study used ethnographic research methods. Five haemophilia experts provided historical and disease area context prior to the initiation of field research. During field research, study researchers collected data through 8–12 hours of participant observation, semi-structured interviews, written exercises, facilitated group dialogues, and on-site observations of the interactions of PwH with friends, family, and health care professionals (HCPs). Study researchers also conducted on-site observation at haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) and interviewed HCPs. The study employed a multi-tiered grounded theory approach and combined data were analysed using techniques such as inductive and deductive analysis, cross-case analysis, challenge mapping, and clustering exercises. This article explores findings related to uncertainty and thus focuses on a subset of the data from the study. Results Fifty-one PwH in Italy, Germany, Spain, UK, and Ireland were interviewed and followed in their daily lives, and 18 HCPs were interviewed. Fifty-two per cent (n=26/50) of PwH in the study experience difficulties translating clinical understanding of protection into specific activities in everyday life. Many have developed their own mental models and care adaptations to navigate treatment uncertainy: these seldom match the medical community's view. These mental models of protection among PwH can cause distress and influence behaviour in a way that can limit possibilities, and/or increase risk. There is also a prevalent tension in the strategies PwH have for managing their protection in terms of day-to-day vs. long-term ambitions. Conclusions These findings on PwH's experience of treatment uncertainty suggest a need to develop tools and communication materials to help PwH better understand the protection provided by their treatment regimen and what that means practically for everyday life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导航不确定性:血友病患者如何理解和应对民族志研究中保护的不确定性的检查
近几十年来,随着血友病治疗的重大进展,血友病患者(PwH)在日常生活中比以往任何时候都受到更多的保护。然而,最近的研究指出,持续或增加患者的不确定性经验。这篇文章的目的是进一步调查与PwH如何理解和应对他们在日常生活中受到保护的不确定性有关的发现,这是一项针对PwH日常生活的大规模民族志研究确定的主题之一,包括与他们的病情、治疗和个人管理病情相关的信仰和经历。方法采用民族志研究方法。五名血友病专家在实地研究开始前提供了历史和疾病领域背景。在实地调查期间,研究人员通过8-12小时的参与者观察、半结构化访谈、书面练习、促进小组对话和现场观察PwH与朋友、家人和卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)的互动来收集数据。研究人员还在血友病治疗中心(hcs)进行了现场观察,并采访了hcp。该研究采用了多层次的扎根理论方法,并使用归纳和演绎分析、跨案例分析、挑战映射和聚类练习等技术对组合数据进行了分析。本文探讨了与不确定性相关的发现,因此侧重于研究数据的一个子集。结果对意大利、德国、西班牙、英国和爱尔兰的51名PwH和18名HCPs进行了访谈和日常生活随访。研究中52% (n=26/50)的PwH患者在将临床对保护的理解转化为日常生活中的具体活动时遇到困难。许多人已经发展了自己的思维模式和护理适应来应对治疗的不确定性:这些很少符合医学界的观点。残疾人的这些心理保护模式可能会造成痛苦,并在某种程度上影响行为,从而限制可能性和/或增加风险。在日常和长期目标方面,PwH管理其保护的策略也存在普遍的紧张关系。这些关于PwH治疗不确定性的研究结果表明,需要开发工具和交流材料,以帮助PwH更好地了解他们的治疗方案所提供的保护,以及这对日常生活的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living, Caring, Learning – The treatment centre as family for a woman with severe haemophilia Living, Caring, Learning – Reflections on the therapeutic relationship in haemophilia care Future Care Pathways – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Future Care Pathways The impact of the Contaminated Blood Scandal on the next generation: the state of the evidence Editorial – Living, Caring, Learning: How patients shape the specialist haemophilia nurse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1