Solemn Venues

Noah Tsika
{"title":"Solemn Venues","authors":"Noah Tsika","doi":"10.1525/california/9780520297630.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1943, the army psychiatrist George S. Goldman began to develop a series of documentaries that could “contribute to mental health” by “removing some of the mystery connected with psychiatry and by properly explaining many of the misconceptions commonly connected with this specialty.” The hope was that such films would help rehabilitate affected veterans and also prevent future psychiatric casualties, and, in the process, that they would solidify the military’s reputation as a “healthful” set of institutions—or, at the very least, as institutions capable of providing effective psychiatric treatment for those in need. Because the so-called neuropsychiatric problem had become so large, threatening to “amount to the largest medical-social problem this country [had] ever faced,” documentary film was deemed necessary as a flexible instrument of education, rehabilitation, and public relations. Because the resulting films dealt with “death and the fear of death,” they were deemed widely relevant, particularly during the nuclear age. Their “focus is on the wartime patient,” noted a 1953 manual, “but the psychodynamics portrayed are generally applicable,” making these films helpful for the population at large. The postwar passage of the National Mental Health Act (1946) and the emergence of a bona fide mental health movement seemed to confirm this power, as government and civilian agencies continued to find new uses for the documentaries.","PeriodicalId":255152,"journal":{"name":"Traumatic Imprints","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traumatic Imprints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520297630.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1943, the army psychiatrist George S. Goldman began to develop a series of documentaries that could “contribute to mental health” by “removing some of the mystery connected with psychiatry and by properly explaining many of the misconceptions commonly connected with this specialty.” The hope was that such films would help rehabilitate affected veterans and also prevent future psychiatric casualties, and, in the process, that they would solidify the military’s reputation as a “healthful” set of institutions—or, at the very least, as institutions capable of providing effective psychiatric treatment for those in need. Because the so-called neuropsychiatric problem had become so large, threatening to “amount to the largest medical-social problem this country [had] ever faced,” documentary film was deemed necessary as a flexible instrument of education, rehabilitation, and public relations. Because the resulting films dealt with “death and the fear of death,” they were deemed widely relevant, particularly during the nuclear age. Their “focus is on the wartime patient,” noted a 1953 manual, “but the psychodynamics portrayed are generally applicable,” making these films helpful for the population at large. The postwar passage of the National Mental Health Act (1946) and the emergence of a bona fide mental health movement seemed to confirm this power, as government and civilian agencies continued to find new uses for the documentaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1943年,陆军精神病学家乔治·s·戈德曼(George S. Goldman)开始制作一系列纪录片,通过“消除与精神病学有关的一些谜团,并适当解释与这一专业有关的许多误解”,“为精神健康做出贡献”。他们希望这样的电影能帮助受影响的退伍军人康复,同时也能防止未来的精神创伤,并且,在这个过程中,他们会巩固军队作为“健康”机构的声誉——或者,至少,作为能够为有需要的人提供有效精神治疗的机构。因为所谓的神经精神问题已经变得如此之大,有可能“成为这个国家所面临的最大的医疗社会问题”,纪录片被认为是教育、康复和公共关系的灵活工具。由于这些电影涉及“死亡和对死亡的恐惧”,它们被认为具有广泛的相关性,尤其是在核时代。1953年的一本手册指出,他们“关注的是战时病人”,“但所描绘的心理动力学是普遍适用的”,这使得这些电影对大多数人都有帮助。战后通过的《国家精神卫生法》(1946年)和真正的精神健康运动的出现似乎证实了这种力量,因为政府和民间机构继续为纪录片寻找新的用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Index 2. Solemn Venues: War Trauma and the Expanding Nontheatrical Realm Select Bibliography Acknowledgments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1