Marx and Engels on the Revolutionary Party

August H. Nimtz
{"title":"Marx and Engels on the Revolutionary Party","authors":"August H. Nimtz","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt1bpmbn2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engels began his brief remarks at Marx’s funeral in 1883 by describing his life-long political companion’s ‘scientific’ accomplishments. ‘But he looked upon science above all things as a grand historical lever, as a revolutionary power in the most eminent sense of the word … For he was indeed, what he called himself, a Revolutionist’. As his closest collaborator, Engels knew better than anyone about this indispensable dimension of Marx’s project. If it wasn’t enough, as the young Marx had concluded in 1845, to ‘interpret the world’ but also necessary ‘to change it’, then action and organization were essential. Yet nowhere did Marx lay out a set of clearly articulated principles for revolutionary organization. But if all of his organized political activities are examined – along with those of Engels after Marx’s death – this essay demonstrates it is possible to distill in broad outlines the norms that guided Marx’s approach to revolutionary organizing. Almost fifty years ago, in the 1967 Socialist Register, Monty Johnstone performed an invaluable service in synthesizing for the first time – certainly in English – Marx and Engels’s views on the revolutionary party. But aside from materials Johnstone didn’t have access to when he published his still quite valuable essay (above all the Marx-Engels Collected Works (MECW), the most complete compilation of their writings in any language) it’s now easier to verify citations of their writings and, more importantly, to see the larger context in which the citations were originally written. Also, much has passed in real world politics since 1967, not least the collapse of the Soviet Union and its satellite regimes after 1989, reigniting much-debated questions (which Johnstone didn’t address) about whether the actions of Lenin, let alone Stalin and his successors, were consistent with the views of Marx and Engels. For today’s activists, what are – the question Marx and Engels would have posed – the organizational lessons inspired by their example?","PeriodicalId":364251,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Register","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Register","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1bpmbn2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engels began his brief remarks at Marx’s funeral in 1883 by describing his life-long political companion’s ‘scientific’ accomplishments. ‘But he looked upon science above all things as a grand historical lever, as a revolutionary power in the most eminent sense of the word … For he was indeed, what he called himself, a Revolutionist’. As his closest collaborator, Engels knew better than anyone about this indispensable dimension of Marx’s project. If it wasn’t enough, as the young Marx had concluded in 1845, to ‘interpret the world’ but also necessary ‘to change it’, then action and organization were essential. Yet nowhere did Marx lay out a set of clearly articulated principles for revolutionary organization. But if all of his organized political activities are examined – along with those of Engels after Marx’s death – this essay demonstrates it is possible to distill in broad outlines the norms that guided Marx’s approach to revolutionary organizing. Almost fifty years ago, in the 1967 Socialist Register, Monty Johnstone performed an invaluable service in synthesizing for the first time – certainly in English – Marx and Engels’s views on the revolutionary party. But aside from materials Johnstone didn’t have access to when he published his still quite valuable essay (above all the Marx-Engels Collected Works (MECW), the most complete compilation of their writings in any language) it’s now easier to verify citations of their writings and, more importantly, to see the larger context in which the citations were originally written. Also, much has passed in real world politics since 1967, not least the collapse of the Soviet Union and its satellite regimes after 1989, reigniting much-debated questions (which Johnstone didn’t address) about whether the actions of Lenin, let alone Stalin and his successors, were consistent with the views of Marx and Engels. For today’s activists, what are – the question Marx and Engels would have posed – the organizational lessons inspired by their example?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马克思和恩格斯论革命党
1883年,恩格斯在马克思的葬礼上发表了简短的讲话,开头描述了他一生的政治伙伴的“科学”成就。“但他把科学看作是一个伟大的历史杠杆,是一种最杰出意义上的革命力量……因为,正如他自称的那样,他确实是一个革命家。”作为马克思最亲密的合作者,恩格斯比任何人都更了解马克思计划中这个不可或缺的方面。正如年轻的马克思在1845年总结的那样,如果仅仅“解释世界”还不够,而且还必须“改变世界”,那么行动和组织是必不可少的。然而,马克思并没有在任何地方为革命组织提出一套清晰的原则。但是,如果考察他所有的有组织的政治活动——以及马克思死后恩格斯的活动——这篇文章表明,有可能概括出指导马克思革命组织方法的准则。大约50年前,在1967年的《社会主义公报》(Socialist Register)上,蒙蒂·约翰斯通(Monty Johnstone)首次(当然是用英文)综合了马克思和恩格斯对革命党的看法,做出了宝贵的贡献。但是,除了约翰斯通在发表他那篇仍然很有价值的文章时没有获得的材料(尤其是《马克思恩格斯文集》(MECW),这是所有语言中最完整的马克思恩格斯著作汇编)之外,现在更容易核实他们著作的引用,更重要的是,可以看到最初引用的更大的背景。此外,自1967年以来,现实世界的政治发生了很多变化,尤其是1989年后苏联及其卫星政权的解体,重新引发了一些备受争议的问题(约翰斯通没有提到),即列宁的行为是否与马克思和恩格斯的观点一致,更不用说斯大林及其继任者了。对于今天的积极分子来说,马克思和恩格斯会提出的问题是,从他们的榜样中得到的组织教训是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing the Impossible The Actuality Of Revolution The Heritage of Eurocommunism in the Contemporary Radical Left The Working Class and the Islamic State in Iran The Role of Financial Discipline in Imperial Strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1