‘In the Land of the Blind, the One-eyed is King’: Some Pedagogical Foundations for Deep, Practical Online Student Learning

P. Mudge
{"title":"‘In the Land of the Blind, the One-eyed is King’: Some Pedagogical Foundations for Deep, Practical Online Student Learning","authors":"P. Mudge","doi":"10.1179/1740714115Z.00000000040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract All those involved in teaching and learning, whether lecturers or their students, are likely to have one or more ‘blind spots’. These blind spots can materialize without warning in areas such as ways of knowing, pedagogical frameworks, or even the types of teaching strategies one selects for face-to-face, blended or online teaching contexts. This article draws examples from online courses designed and taught by the author (principally to RE teachers in primary and secondary schools), and argues that course lecturers and their students alike need to examine and critique certain background assumptions to teaching and learning, their pedagogical models and ways of knowing, along with the practical teaching and learning strategies that they select to support these areas. The two courses referred to are EDUC6043, Religious education: theory and practice, and RELT6016, Spiritualities, practices and values. Two teaching approaches explored in more detail are personal, reflective writing, and project-based learning.","PeriodicalId":224329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1740714115Z.00000000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract All those involved in teaching and learning, whether lecturers or their students, are likely to have one or more ‘blind spots’. These blind spots can materialize without warning in areas such as ways of knowing, pedagogical frameworks, or even the types of teaching strategies one selects for face-to-face, blended or online teaching contexts. This article draws examples from online courses designed and taught by the author (principally to RE teachers in primary and secondary schools), and argues that course lecturers and their students alike need to examine and critique certain background assumptions to teaching and learning, their pedagogical models and ways of knowing, along with the practical teaching and learning strategies that they select to support these areas. The two courses referred to are EDUC6043, Religious education: theory and practice, and RELT6016, Spiritualities, practices and values. Two teaching approaches explored in more detail are personal, reflective writing, and project-based learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“在盲人之国,独眼为王”:深度、实用的在线学生学习的教学基础
所有参与教学的人,无论是教师还是学生,都可能有一个或多个“盲点”。这些盲点可能会毫无征兆地出现在诸如认知方式、教学框架,甚至是面对面、混合或在线教学环境中选择的教学策略类型等领域。本文以作者设计和教授的在线课程为例(主要是针对中小学的RE教师),并认为课程讲师和学生都需要检查和批判教学和学习的某些背景假设,他们的教学模式和认识方式,以及他们选择支持这些领域的实践教学和学习策略。所指的两门课程是:EDUC6043,宗教教育:理论与实践;RELT6016,灵性,实践与价值观。更详细地探讨了两种教学方法:个人反思写作和基于项目的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Threshold of Conscience: A Radical Challenge for Education in Theological Ethics … and Beyond ‘Dissolving Boundaries’ – An Analysis of Threshold Concepts Within Disability Theology Cognition or Spiritual Disposition? Threshold Concepts in Theological Reflection† ‘Tell Me the Landscapes in Which You Live and I Will Tell You Who You Are’ – Online Theology Students Crossing Thresholds in Religious Education and Spirituality Against an Australian Desert Context A Response: Threshold Concepts in Religious Education and Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1