Facilitators, Barriers and Motivators of Paramedic Continuing Professional Development

Lisa Hobbs, S. Devenish, D. Long, V. Tippett
{"title":"Facilitators, Barriers and Motivators of Paramedic Continuing Professional Development","authors":"Lisa Hobbs, S. Devenish, D. Long, V. Tippett","doi":"10.33151/ajp.18.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction As registered health professionals, Australian paramedics are required to abide by professional registration standards including the maintenance of continuing professional development (CPD). The broader health literature identifies facilitators, barriers and motivators for engaging in CPD, however the body of knowledge specific to paramedicine is weak. This research seeks to address this gap in the paramedicine body of knowledge. Methods This study adopts a constructivist grounded theory methodology. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and analysed using first and second cycle coding techniques. Paramedics from various state-based Australasian ambulance services and private industry (N=10) discussed their experiences specific to their attitudes, perceptions and engagement about CPD. Results Paramedic CPD goes beyond the traditional approach to mandatory training. Paramedics are motivated by factors such as modality of delivery, professional expectations, clinical/professional improvement and, sometimes, fear. Facilitators included organisational support, improved clinical knowledge, practitioner confidence, self-directed learning opportunities and perceived relevance of content. Barriers include cost, workload/fatigue, location, rostering, lack of incentive to engage, lack of employer support and technological problems. Conclusion By understanding what facilitates or motivates engagement in CPD activities, paramedics can navigate their CPD in conjunction with regulatory requirements. Although paramedics report some similar experiences to other health professionals, there are nuances that appear specific to the discipline of paramedicine. Of interest, a unique finding related to fear influencing paramedic CPD engagement. The results of this study informs paramedic employers and paramedic CPD providers with insights to assist in the development of positive CPD experiences and interactions.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.18.857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction As registered health professionals, Australian paramedics are required to abide by professional registration standards including the maintenance of continuing professional development (CPD). The broader health literature identifies facilitators, barriers and motivators for engaging in CPD, however the body of knowledge specific to paramedicine is weak. This research seeks to address this gap in the paramedicine body of knowledge. Methods This study adopts a constructivist grounded theory methodology. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and analysed using first and second cycle coding techniques. Paramedics from various state-based Australasian ambulance services and private industry (N=10) discussed their experiences specific to their attitudes, perceptions and engagement about CPD. Results Paramedic CPD goes beyond the traditional approach to mandatory training. Paramedics are motivated by factors such as modality of delivery, professional expectations, clinical/professional improvement and, sometimes, fear. Facilitators included organisational support, improved clinical knowledge, practitioner confidence, self-directed learning opportunities and perceived relevance of content. Barriers include cost, workload/fatigue, location, rostering, lack of incentive to engage, lack of employer support and technological problems. Conclusion By understanding what facilitates or motivates engagement in CPD activities, paramedics can navigate their CPD in conjunction with regulatory requirements. Although paramedics report some similar experiences to other health professionals, there are nuances that appear specific to the discipline of paramedicine. Of interest, a unique finding related to fear influencing paramedic CPD engagement. The results of this study informs paramedic employers and paramedic CPD providers with insights to assist in the development of positive CPD experiences and interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助医务人员持续专业发展的促进因素、障碍和激励因素
作为注册的卫生专业人员,澳大利亚护理人员必须遵守专业注册标准,包括维持持续专业发展(CPD)。更广泛的健康文献确定了参与CPD的促进因素、障碍和动机,然而,专门针对辅助医学的知识体系很薄弱。本研究旨在解决这一差距在辅助医学知识体系。方法本研究采用建构主义扎根理论研究方法。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用第一和第二周期编码技术进行分析。来自澳大利亚各州救护车服务和私营企业的护理人员(N=10)讨论了他们对CPD的态度、看法和参与的具体经历。结果护理人员CPD超越了传统的强制性培训方式。护理人员的动机包括分娩方式、专业期望、临床/专业进步,有时还有恐惧。促进因素包括组织支持、临床知识的提高、从业人员的信心、自主学习机会和内容的感知相关性。障碍包括成本、工作量/疲劳、地点、名册、缺乏参与的激励、缺乏雇主支持和技术问题。通过了解促进或激励参与CPD活动的因素,护理人员可以结合监管要求驾驭他们的CPD。虽然护理人员报告了一些与其他卫生专业人员相似的经历,但护理人员的学科似乎存在细微差别。有趣的是,一个关于恐惧影响护理人员CPD参与的独特发现。本研究的结果为护理人员雇主和护理人员CPD提供者提供了见解,以协助发展积极的CPD经验和互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of An Electronic Referral Proforma from Paramedics to General Practitioners: A Delphi Study Comparison of Two Pre-Hospital Stroke Scales to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes in Australia: A Prospective Observational Study A New Era of Opportunity – Securing Excellence for Our Journal Experience of Paramedics Providing Care to People Living with Dementia: The Working with Uncertainty Pre-Hospital Early Warning Scores are Associated with Requirement for Medical Retrieval Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1