Coping Strategies for Stress: A Comparative Study among Nurses Working in Multi-and Single-Speciality Hospitals

D. Rajan
{"title":"Coping Strategies for Stress: A Comparative Study among Nurses Working in Multi-and Single-Speciality Hospitals","authors":"D. Rajan","doi":"10.5958/2231-0657.2016.00028.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This survey-based qualitative descriptive research has been undertaken in Tirunelveli city, Tamilnadu to understand and differentiate coping strategies being followed by nurses working in both multi-speciality and single-speciality hospitals to deal with stress and to examine the relationship between demographic variables and coping strategies. The structured format of coping strategies established by Folkman and Lazarus has been used in this study to analyse and differentiate coping styles of nurses. It has been analysed under five dimensions namely positive and action focused coping, wishful thinking and positive reappraisal, distancing, escape and avoidance and seeking social support coping. The study has sampled 120 (60 from multi-speciality hospitals and 60 from single-speciality hospitals) nurses qualified with Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery and Bachelor of Science in Nursing courses. Mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation have been used to rank and differentiate the dimensions of coping strategies. Kruskal–Wallis test has been administered to examine the relationship between coping strategies and demographic variables. The result indicates that there is no marked differences in the perception of the nurses working in both kinds of organisation towards majority of the coping strategies discussed under five dimensions of the Folkman and Lazarus coping strategies. The perception level of majority of the respondents working in both kinds of hospitals has been at medium level towards all coping strategies.","PeriodicalId":268303,"journal":{"name":"Siddhant- A Journal of Decision Making","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siddhant- A Journal of Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-0657.2016.00028.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This survey-based qualitative descriptive research has been undertaken in Tirunelveli city, Tamilnadu to understand and differentiate coping strategies being followed by nurses working in both multi-speciality and single-speciality hospitals to deal with stress and to examine the relationship between demographic variables and coping strategies. The structured format of coping strategies established by Folkman and Lazarus has been used in this study to analyse and differentiate coping styles of nurses. It has been analysed under five dimensions namely positive and action focused coping, wishful thinking and positive reappraisal, distancing, escape and avoidance and seeking social support coping. The study has sampled 120 (60 from multi-speciality hospitals and 60 from single-speciality hospitals) nurses qualified with Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery and Bachelor of Science in Nursing courses. Mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation have been used to rank and differentiate the dimensions of coping strategies. Kruskal–Wallis test has been administered to examine the relationship between coping strategies and demographic variables. The result indicates that there is no marked differences in the perception of the nurses working in both kinds of organisation towards majority of the coping strategies discussed under five dimensions of the Folkman and Lazarus coping strategies. The perception level of majority of the respondents working in both kinds of hospitals has been at medium level towards all coping strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多专科医院与单专科医院护士压力应对策略的比较研究
这项基于调查的定性描述性研究是在泰米尔纳德邦蒂鲁内veli市进行的,目的是了解和区分在多专科医院和单一专科医院工作的护士为应对压力而采取的应对策略,并检查人口变量与应对策略之间的关系。本研究采用Folkman和Lazarus建立的应对策略结构化格式来分析和区分护士的应对方式。它被分析为五个维度,即积极和以行动为中心的应对,一厢情愿和积极的重新评价,距离,逃避和回避以及寻求社会支持应对。该研究抽样了120名护士(60名来自多专科医院,60名来自单一专科医院),这些护士具有普通护理和助产文凭以及护理学学士学位。采用均值、标准差和变异系数对应对策略的维度进行排序和区分。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验检验应对策略与人口统计学变量之间的关系。结果表明,在这两种组织中工作的护士对在Folkman和Lazarus应对策略的五个维度下讨论的大多数应对策略的看法没有显著差异。在这两种医院工作的大多数受访者对所有应对策略的认知水平都处于中等水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Effect of Corruption on Industrial Exports Value (Case Study: The Selected Developing Countries) Carbon Tax for Sustainability-An Indian Perspective Financial innovations in Indian Banking Industry: An evaluation of innovativeness and financial performance of selected bank Analysis of Performance of Road User Services on Two Toll Roads in Pune Region Public Perception Towards the Decision of Demonetisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1