Axis Specific Player Load to Quantify Lower Limb Biomechanical Loading in Adolescent Badminton Players

M. Wylde, B.R.Senthil Kumar, L. C. Yong, Andrew J. Callaway
{"title":"Axis Specific Player Load to Quantify Lower Limb Biomechanical Loading in Adolescent Badminton Players","authors":"M. Wylde, B.R.Senthil Kumar, L. C. Yong, Andrew J. Callaway","doi":"10.30827/digibug.57329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the use of accelerometer derived Player Load has become increasingly prominent, the limitation of this approach is that training load is reduced to a single number with no differentiation between the mechanisms of loading, resulting in a loss of context. As recovery from different loadings occur at different rates, the inability to differentiate between the loading mechanisms could lead to under or over training in one or more of these mechanisms. This study sought to compare axis specific accelerometer derived Player Load with differential RPE scores to establish a means of quantifying the lower limb biomechanical load of adolescent badminton training, to \ntry and understand some of the context into the Player Load number. It was postulated that the Player Load from the vertical axis would provide a more precise measure of lower limb loading as other loading parameters, such as upper body rotation observed during a smash, would be removed from the calculation. Nineteen adolescent \nbadminton players (Age: 14.0 ± 0.8 y) based at a dedicated high performance youth training environment wore a GPS-embedded accelerometer between the scapulae in a purpose built vest during court-based training. After each training session the participants provided two RPE scores, one localised for the legs and one for breathlessness. Overall low correlations were observed between the Player Load and RPE values. The Player Load for the vertical \naxis showed a stronger correlation with the RPE for breathlessness than the RPE for the lower limb stress. The results from this study suggest that axis specific Player Load from the vertical axis does not provide greater insight into lower-limb biomechanical load compared to overall Player Load in adolescent badminton players.","PeriodicalId":393687,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Racket Sports Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Racket Sports Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.57329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

While the use of accelerometer derived Player Load has become increasingly prominent, the limitation of this approach is that training load is reduced to a single number with no differentiation between the mechanisms of loading, resulting in a loss of context. As recovery from different loadings occur at different rates, the inability to differentiate between the loading mechanisms could lead to under or over training in one or more of these mechanisms. This study sought to compare axis specific accelerometer derived Player Load with differential RPE scores to establish a means of quantifying the lower limb biomechanical load of adolescent badminton training, to try and understand some of the context into the Player Load number. It was postulated that the Player Load from the vertical axis would provide a more precise measure of lower limb loading as other loading parameters, such as upper body rotation observed during a smash, would be removed from the calculation. Nineteen adolescent badminton players (Age: 14.0 ± 0.8 y) based at a dedicated high performance youth training environment wore a GPS-embedded accelerometer between the scapulae in a purpose built vest during court-based training. After each training session the participants provided two RPE scores, one localised for the legs and one for breathlessness. Overall low correlations were observed between the Player Load and RPE values. The Player Load for the vertical axis showed a stronger correlation with the RPE for breathlessness than the RPE for the lower limb stress. The results from this study suggest that axis specific Player Load from the vertical axis does not provide greater insight into lower-limb biomechanical load compared to overall Player Load in adolescent badminton players.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轴特定球员负荷量化青少年羽毛球运动员下肢生物力学负荷
虽然使用加速计衍生的玩家负荷变得越来越突出,但这种方法的局限性在于,训练负荷被减少到一个单一的数字,没有区分负荷机制,导致丢失上下文。由于不同负荷的恢复速度不同,无法区分不同的负荷机制可能导致其中一种或多种机制的训练不足或过度。本研究试图比较轴向特定加速度计得出的运动员负荷与不同的RPE分数,以建立一种量化青少年羽毛球训练下肢生物力学负荷的方法,并试图了解运动员负荷数字的一些背景。假设来自垂直轴的玩家载荷将提供更精确的下肢载荷测量,因为其他载荷参数,如在粉碎过程中观察到的上体旋转,将从计算中删除。19名青少年羽毛球运动员(年龄:14.0±0.8岁)在一个专门的高性能青少年训练环境中,在一件特制的背心中,在肩胛骨之间佩戴了嵌入gps的加速度计,进行了基于球场的训练。每次训练结束后,参与者提供两份RPE评分,一份针对腿部,另一份针对呼吸困难。总体而言,玩家负载和RPE值之间的相关性较低。纵轴的玩家负荷与呼吸困难的RPE的相关性比下肢压力的RPE更强。本研究的结果表明,与青少年羽毛球运动员的整体运动员负荷相比,来自垂直轴的特定运动员负荷并不能更深入地了解下肢生物力学负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of subjective stats of key performance indicators in tennis Performance analysis in tennis since 2000: A systematic review focused on the methods of data collection Validation of lower limb muscle activation estimated using musculoskeletal modeling against electromyography in the table tennis topspin forehand and backhand Reliability and validity of motion sensor and radar for measuring shuttlecock velocity in badminton. Reliability and validity to measure velocity in badminton Validation of wearables for technical analysis of tennis players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1