Implementation of Competency-Based Curriculum in Medical Education: Perspective of Different Roles

ISRN Education Pub Date : 2012-08-29 DOI:10.5402/2012/651426
Aline Guerra Aquilante, Roseli F. da Silva, Mariza Borges Brito de Souza, Renata Gianecchini Bongiovanni Kishi
{"title":"Implementation of Competency-Based Curriculum in Medical Education: Perspective of Different Roles","authors":"Aline Guerra Aquilante, Roseli F. da Silva, Mariza Borges Brito de Souza, Renata Gianecchini Bongiovanni Kishi","doi":"10.5402/2012/651426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This cross-sectional case study investigates the curriculum implementation at the School of Medicine at the Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos (UFSCar), comparing the perspectives of the different participant types involved in this training (i.e., students, lecturers, and preceptors) and the programme goals. The sample included 22 lecturers, 55 students, and 16 preceptors. The researchers created a structured questionnaire based on study indicators extracted from the following aspects of the educational programme: teaching and learning process, integration of competency areas, teaching and learning scenarios, integration of theory and practice, and assessment. A Likert scale with four response options was used to score the respondents' choices. The participants answered the questionnaire online, and the responses were entered into a MySQL database. Using this database, an analysis was conducted based on the subjects' responses and the indicators. Comparative analysis was performed using the bootstrap method for responses and analysis feasibility with a 5% empirical significance level. The teaching and learning process, integration of theory and practice, and assessment indicators were in agreement with the educational programme, while integration of competency areas and teaching and learning scenarios require greater attention to establish consistency with the educational programme and training qualifications.","PeriodicalId":202265,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/651426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This cross-sectional case study investigates the curriculum implementation at the School of Medicine at the Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos (UFSCar), comparing the perspectives of the different participant types involved in this training (i.e., students, lecturers, and preceptors) and the programme goals. The sample included 22 lecturers, 55 students, and 16 preceptors. The researchers created a structured questionnaire based on study indicators extracted from the following aspects of the educational programme: teaching and learning process, integration of competency areas, teaching and learning scenarios, integration of theory and practice, and assessment. A Likert scale with four response options was used to score the respondents' choices. The participants answered the questionnaire online, and the responses were entered into a MySQL database. Using this database, an analysis was conducted based on the subjects' responses and the indicators. Comparative analysis was performed using the bootstrap method for responses and analysis feasibility with a 5% empirical significance level. The teaching and learning process, integration of theory and practice, and assessment indicators were in agreement with the educational programme, while integration of competency areas and teaching and learning scenarios require greater attention to establish consistency with the educational programme and training qualifications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能力本位课程在医学教育中的实施:不同角色的视角
本横断面案例研究调查了圣卡洛斯联邦大学医学院的课程实施情况,比较了参与培训的不同参与者类型(即学生、讲师和导师)的观点和方案目标。样本包括22名讲师,55名学生和16名导师。研究人员根据从教育计划的以下方面提取的研究指标创建了一份结构化问卷:教与学过程、能力领域的整合、教与学场景、理论与实践的整合以及评估。李克特量表有四个回答选项,用于对受访者的选择进行评分。参与者在线回答问卷,并将回答输入MySQL数据库。利用该数据库,根据被试的回答和指标进行分析。采用bootstrap方法对响应和分析可行性进行比较分析,实证显著性水平为5%。教学过程、理论与实践的结合和评价指标与教育方案一致,而能力领域和教学情景的结合则需要更加注意与教育方案和培训资格建立一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inquiry-Based Education for Students with Visual Impairment Comparison of Teacher Motivation for Mathematics and Special Educators in Middle Schools That Have and Have Not Achieved AYP Considering District and School Factors and Their Relationship to ACT Performance in North Carolina: An Examination of the ACT Pilot Results Caring for Students: What Teachers Have to Say Tool Use in Computer-Based Learning Environments: Adopting and Extending the Technology Acceptance Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1