Different Approach of Policies in E-Waste Management System: A Case Study of India in Comparison to Germany

Silvia Refina Dewi
{"title":"Different Approach of Policies in E-Waste Management System: A Case Study of India in Comparison to Germany","authors":"Silvia Refina Dewi","doi":"10.33422/2nd.rsetconf.2019.09.623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". With a total of 44.7 million tonnes of electronic waste (e-waste) produced worldwide in 2016, only approximately 20% of e-waste documented to be recycled in formal sectors. As many as 80% of undocumented e-waste which both informally recycled and piled up in landfill has huge side effects towards the health of societies and environment. Policies have contributed to be the guideline in implementing e-waste management system within the country. Thus, in this article India and Germany are chosen in order to compare the different policies existed in both country that result in different management of e-waste. India as the fourth country who generates most ewaste in the world produces 2 million e-waste in 2016. However, only 0.036 million tonnes of ewaste managed by India in 2016-2017. Whereas 95% of India e-waste is recycled informally. In other hand, Germany ranks in the fifth place of countries with most e-waste producer (1.9 million tonnes) successfully recycles their e-waste up to 39% in 2016. The method used in comparing these two conditions is a case study with data collected from various sources. As result, standards of equipment and recovery as well as recycling of e-waste have become the key differences in India policies in compared to Germany. This condition can be addressed by increasing the standards, increasing knowledge sharing, maximizing the output of e-waste management, stating clear sanctions to societies and companies. Besides, strengthening the implementation and monitoring of policies issued should become India’s strategy in achieving its e-waste management target.","PeriodicalId":332246,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Research in Science, Engineering and Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Research in Science, Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/2nd.rsetconf.2019.09.623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. With a total of 44.7 million tonnes of electronic waste (e-waste) produced worldwide in 2016, only approximately 20% of e-waste documented to be recycled in formal sectors. As many as 80% of undocumented e-waste which both informally recycled and piled up in landfill has huge side effects towards the health of societies and environment. Policies have contributed to be the guideline in implementing e-waste management system within the country. Thus, in this article India and Germany are chosen in order to compare the different policies existed in both country that result in different management of e-waste. India as the fourth country who generates most ewaste in the world produces 2 million e-waste in 2016. However, only 0.036 million tonnes of ewaste managed by India in 2016-2017. Whereas 95% of India e-waste is recycled informally. In other hand, Germany ranks in the fifth place of countries with most e-waste producer (1.9 million tonnes) successfully recycles their e-waste up to 39% in 2016. The method used in comparing these two conditions is a case study with data collected from various sources. As result, standards of equipment and recovery as well as recycling of e-waste have become the key differences in India policies in compared to Germany. This condition can be addressed by increasing the standards, increasing knowledge sharing, maximizing the output of e-waste management, stating clear sanctions to societies and companies. Besides, strengthening the implementation and monitoring of policies issued should become India’s strategy in achieving its e-waste management target.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子垃圾管理系统的不同政策路径:以印度与德国为例
. 2016年,全球共产生4470万吨电子废物(电子废物),只有约20%的电子废物被记录在正规部门进行回收。多达80%的无证电子垃圾被非正式地回收和堆积在垃圾填埋场,对社会和环境的健康产生了巨大的副作用。政策有助于成为国内实施电子废物管理系统的指导方针。因此,在这篇文章中,选择印度和德国,以比较两国存在的不同政策,导致不同的电子废物管理。印度是世界上第四个产生电子垃圾最多的国家,2016年产生了200万个电子垃圾。然而,2016-2017年印度只处理了0.036万吨电子垃圾。然而,印度95%的电子垃圾是通过非正式方式回收的。另一方面,德国在电子垃圾生产国(190万吨)最多的国家中排名第五,2016年成功回收电子垃圾的比例高达39%。比较这两种情况所使用的方法是从不同来源收集数据的案例研究。因此,与德国相比,设备和回收标准以及电子废物的再循环已成为印度政策的关键差异。这种情况可以通过提高标准、增加知识共享、最大化电子废物管理的产出、明确对社会和公司的制裁来解决。此外,加强政策的实施和监督应成为印度实现其电子废物管理目标的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Inverted Fins Design Problem Feature Extraction for Handwritten Signature Verification Analysis of Post-Disaster Construction Safety Management: Challenges Faced by Mozambican Government due to Natural Disasters (Cyclone, Floods) Coating as Micro-Structural System Impact of Material On Energy Efficiency of Distribution System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1