Building Last Mile Delivery Scenarios: A Case Study of Melbourne

K. Ewedairo, P. Chhetri, J. Dodson, S. Rahman
{"title":"Building Last Mile Delivery Scenarios: A Case Study of Melbourne","authors":"K. Ewedairo, P. Chhetri, J. Dodson, S. Rahman","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to build plausible scenarios to formulate the future of last mile delivery using planning and transport infrastructure attributes as key drivers of last mile bottlenecks. The scenario thinking method is applied to understand and analyse apparent perverse last mile challenges with ‘critical uncertainties’ associated with projection of future patterns. Key stakeholders associated with last mile delivery in an urban setting were identified and their positioning assessed on power and interest. The state and local government with HighPower: LowInterest (HP:LI), and truck associations/drivers LowPower: HighInterest (LP:HI) were identified as key stakeholders with different levels of power and interest. Players such as VicRoads and Traders Associations represent the quadrant of HP:HI who could play a vital role to gain support for more infrastructure investment and technological innovation to help improve the efficiency of city logistics operations. Four plausible urban scenarios were identified using two extracted dimensions: Infrastructure Supply and Intensive Land use. The worst/worst scenario highlighted the area of need for strategic planning to mitigate risk associated with damaged products, congestion, last mile delivery stagnation and ageing infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":119238,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper aims to build plausible scenarios to formulate the future of last mile delivery using planning and transport infrastructure attributes as key drivers of last mile bottlenecks. The scenario thinking method is applied to understand and analyse apparent perverse last mile challenges with ‘critical uncertainties’ associated with projection of future patterns. Key stakeholders associated with last mile delivery in an urban setting were identified and their positioning assessed on power and interest. The state and local government with HighPower: LowInterest (HP:LI), and truck associations/drivers LowPower: HighInterest (LP:HI) were identified as key stakeholders with different levels of power and interest. Players such as VicRoads and Traders Associations represent the quadrant of HP:HI who could play a vital role to gain support for more infrastructure investment and technological innovation to help improve the efficiency of city logistics operations. Four plausible urban scenarios were identified using two extracted dimensions: Infrastructure Supply and Intensive Land use. The worst/worst scenario highlighted the area of need for strategic planning to mitigate risk associated with damaged products, congestion, last mile delivery stagnation and ageing infrastructure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建“最后一英里”配送场景:以墨尔本为例
本文旨在构建合理的场景,以规划和交通基础设施属性作为最后一英里瓶颈的关键驱动因素,来制定最后一英里交付的未来。情景思维方法用于理解和分析与未来模式预测相关的“关键不确定性”的明显反常的最后一英里挑战。确定了与城市环境中最后一英里交付相关的关键利益相关者,并根据权力和利益评估了他们的定位。具有高权力:低利益(HP:LI)的州和地方政府以及低权力:高利益(LP:HI)的卡车协会/司机被确定为具有不同权力和利益水平的关键利益相关者。像VicRoads和Traders Associations这样的参与者代表了HP:HI的象限,他们可以在获得更多基础设施投资和技术创新的支持方面发挥重要作用,以帮助提高城市物流运营的效率。利用提取的两个维度:基础设施供应和集约土地利用,确定了四种合理的城市情景。最坏/最坏的情况突出了需要战略规划的领域,以减轻与产品损坏、拥堵、最后一英里交付停滞和基础设施老化相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Conceptual Interaction Cycle Between Individual and Group Absorptive Capacity with Social Integration Mechanism and Cohesive Learning Group as Moderating Variables Data-driven Defense Strategies for an Infrastructure Network against Multiple Interdictions Supplier Selection Model Development for Modular Product with Substitutability and Controllable Lead Time On a Discrete-time Epidemic Model based on a Continuous-time SEIR Model Under Feedback Vaccination Controls Biomass Supply Chain Design, Planning and Management: A Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1