{"title":"Advances in Management Accounting","authors":"M. Malina","doi":"10.1108/s1474-787120140000024015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This article examines management accounting practice in relation to the two aspects of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM): risk management and internal controls. Methodology/Approach – We conducted a survey of experienced management accountants to find out about the risk management and internal control aspects of their current ERM practices, and their perceived effectiveness in performing various ERM roles, within the context of the ERM culture and the level of information systems support for ERM in their organizations. Findings – In terms of the risk management aspects of ERM, the management accountants in the survey contribute highly to managing risks of a Advances in Management Accounting, Volume 30, 1–25 Copyright © 2018 by Emerald Publishing Limited All rights of reproduction in any form reserved ISSN: 1474-7871/doi:10.1108/S1474-787120180000030002 2 REGINA F. BENTO ET AL. financial or compliance/legal nature and tend to focus mostly on risks with potentially higher impact and higher likelihood of occurring. In terms of the internal control aspects of ERM, they play a highly important role in ERM activities related to prevention and internal risk treatment. Their organizations have an ERM culture that is perceived as open to challenging discussions about risk and have implemented IS support for management accounting in areas such as information security and standardized information architecture. Overall, the effectiveness of their contributions to ERM is perceived to be high in the areas of compliance and finance-related risk. Originality/Value – We develop a framework and offer empirical evidence about the ERM contributions of management accountants. We propose and use two original scales: one to classify ERM activities, and the other to assess ERM culture.","PeriodicalId":273115,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Management Accounting","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Management Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-787120140000024015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
管理会计进展
目的-本文探讨了管理会计实践与企业风险管理(ERM)的两个方面:风险管理和内部控制。方法论/方法-我们对经验丰富的管理会计师进行了一项调查,以了解他们当前ERM实践的风险管理和内部控制方面,以及他们在ERM文化背景下履行各种ERM角色的感知有效性,以及他们组织中ERM的信息系统支持水平。调查结果-就ERM的风险管理方面而言,调查中的管理会计师对管理风险做出了很大贡献。《管理会计进展》,第30卷,第1-25期版权所有©2018 by Emerald Publishing Limited保留所有以任何形式复制的权利ISSN:REGINA F. BENTO ET AL.财务或合规/法律性质,倾向于主要关注潜在影响更大、发生可能性更高的风险。就企业风险管理的内部控制方面而言,它们在企业风险管理的预防和内部风险处理活动中发挥着非常重要的作用。他们的组织有一种ERM文化,这种文化被认为对风险的挑战性讨论持开放态度,并在信息安全和标准化信息架构等领域实现了对管理会计的is支持。总体而言,他们对ERM的贡献在合规和财务相关风险方面的有效性被认为是很高的。原创性/价值-我们开发了一个框架,并提供了关于管理会计师ERM贡献的经验证据。我们提出并使用了两个原始量表:一个用于对ERM活动进行分类,另一个用于评估ERM文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。