Should Antitrust Education Be Mandatory (for Law School Administrators)?

R. R. Barondes, T. Lambert
{"title":"Should Antitrust Education Be Mandatory (for Law School Administrators)?","authors":"R. R. Barondes, T. Lambert","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.597841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Executive Committee of the Association of American Law Schools has adopted a Statement of Good Practices that purports to limit the times when law schools may make offers to hire faculty members at other schools. Schools are generally not to make offers for indefinite appointments to professors on other faculties after March 1, subject to extension for two months with the consent of the incumbent's dean. They also are not to make offers contemplating resignation from a current faculty position more than two weeks following those deadlines. Proceeding on the assumption that the AALS policy, whose express terms are precatory, speaks to what is in fact an agreement among law schools, this essay concludes this policy memorializes an understanding in violation of Federal antitrust law.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.597841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Executive Committee of the Association of American Law Schools has adopted a Statement of Good Practices that purports to limit the times when law schools may make offers to hire faculty members at other schools. Schools are generally not to make offers for indefinite appointments to professors on other faculties after March 1, subject to extension for two months with the consent of the incumbent's dean. They also are not to make offers contemplating resignation from a current faculty position more than two weeks following those deadlines. Proceeding on the assumption that the AALS policy, whose express terms are precatory, speaks to what is in fact an agreement among law schools, this essay concludes this policy memorializes an understanding in violation of Federal antitrust law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反垄断教育应该是强制性的吗(对法学院管理者来说)?
美国法学院协会执行委员会通过了一项良好实践声明,旨在限制法学院向其他学校提供教职员工的时间。在3月1日之后,商学院一般不得向其他院系的教授提供无限期聘用,但经现任院长同意,可以将聘用期限延长两个月。他们也不能在截止日期后的两周内提出辞职的建议。基于AALS政策(其明确条款是强制性的)实际上是法学院之间的协议的假设,本文得出结论,该政策是一种违反联邦反垄断法的谅解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lawyer Brain - Transform your Well-being and Develop a Performance Edge The Scholarly Impact Matrix: An Empirical Study of How Multiple Metrics Create an Informed Story of a Scholar's Work Law and Economics Under the Palms: Henry Manne at the University of Miami, 1974–1980 Curriculum Decolonisation and Revisionist Pedagogy of African Customary Law Правовое просвещение, электронная демократия и медиаобразование: основы эффективной интеграции (Legal Education, e-Democracy and Media Education: The Basis of Effective Integration)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1