Revisiting 'brain modes' in a new computational era: approaches for the characterization of brain-behavioural associations.

M. Toba, O. Godefroy, R. Rushmore, M. Zavaglia, R. Maatoug, C. Hilgetag, A. Valero-Cabré
{"title":"Revisiting 'brain modes' in a new computational era: approaches for the characterization of brain-behavioural associations.","authors":"M. Toba, O. Godefroy, R. Rushmore, M. Zavaglia, R. Maatoug, C. Hilgetag, A. Valero-Cabré","doi":"10.1093/brain/awz343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of brain-function relationships is undergoing a conceptual and methodological transformation due to the emergence of network neuroscience and the development of multivariate methods for lesion-deficit inferences. Anticipating this process, in 1998 Godefroy and co-workers conceptualized the potential of four elementary typologies of brain-behaviour relationships named 'brain modes' (unicity, equivalence, association, summation) as building blocks able to describe the association between intact or lesioned brain regions and cognitive processes or neurological deficits. In the light of new multivariate lesion inference and network approaches, we critically revisit and update the original theoretical notion of brain modes, and provide real-life clinical examples that support their existence. To improve the characterization of elementary units of brain-behavioural relationships further, we extend such conceptualization with a fifth brain mode (mutual inhibition/masking summation). We critically assess the ability of these five brain modes to account for any type of brain-function relationship, and discuss past versus future contributions in redefining the anatomical basis of human cognition. We also address the potential of brain modes for predicting the behavioural consequences of lesions and their future role in the design of cognitive neurorehabilitation therapies.","PeriodicalId":121505,"journal":{"name":"Brain : a journal of neurology","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain : a journal of neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The study of brain-function relationships is undergoing a conceptual and methodological transformation due to the emergence of network neuroscience and the development of multivariate methods for lesion-deficit inferences. Anticipating this process, in 1998 Godefroy and co-workers conceptualized the potential of four elementary typologies of brain-behaviour relationships named 'brain modes' (unicity, equivalence, association, summation) as building blocks able to describe the association between intact or lesioned brain regions and cognitive processes or neurological deficits. In the light of new multivariate lesion inference and network approaches, we critically revisit and update the original theoretical notion of brain modes, and provide real-life clinical examples that support their existence. To improve the characterization of elementary units of brain-behavioural relationships further, we extend such conceptualization with a fifth brain mode (mutual inhibition/masking summation). We critically assess the ability of these five brain modes to account for any type of brain-function relationship, and discuss past versus future contributions in redefining the anatomical basis of human cognition. We also address the potential of brain modes for predicting the behavioural consequences of lesions and their future role in the design of cognitive neurorehabilitation therapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新的计算时代重新审视“大脑模式”:描述大脑行为关联的方法。
由于网络神经科学的出现和多变量损伤-缺陷推断方法的发展,脑功能关系的研究正在经历概念和方法上的转变。预计到这一过程,1998年Godefroy和同事将大脑行为关系的四种基本类型的潜力概念化,称为“大脑模式”(唯一性,等效,关联,总和),作为能够描述完整或受损的大脑区域与认知过程或神经缺陷之间联系的构建模块。在新的多元病变推断和网络方法的指导下,我们批判性地重新审视和更新了大脑模式的原始理论概念,并提供了支持其存在的现实临床实例。为了进一步提高大脑行为关系基本单位的表征,我们用第五种大脑模式(相互抑制/掩蔽求和)扩展了这种概念化。我们批判性地评估了这五种大脑模式的能力,以解释任何类型的脑功能关系,并讨论了在重新定义人类认知的解剖学基础方面过去与未来的贡献。我们还讨论了预测病变行为后果的大脑模式的潜力及其在认知神经康复疗法设计中的未来作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vaccination with structurally modified fungal protein fibrils: a new treatment for synucleinopathies? Serum GFAP levels correlate with astrocyte reactivity, post-mortem brain atrophy and neurofibrillary tangles. Biallelic truncating variants in PACSIN3 cause childhood-onset myopathy with hyperCKaemia. Blood GFAP reflects astrocyte reactivity to Alzheimer's pathology in post-mortem brain tissue. Correction to: Disrupted daily activity/rest cycles in relation to daily cortisol rhythms of home-dwelling patients with early Alzheimer's dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1