{"title":"Options for rehabilitation of Australia's Snowy River: an economic perspective.","authors":"J. Pigram","doi":"10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<363::AID-RRR610>3.0.CO;2-I","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Snowy Mountains Scheme in southeast Australia provides a good example of the extensive changes that can occur in streams from which water is transferred. The Scheme, now 50 years old, diverts large amounts of water from the Snowy River inland to generate hydro-electricity and to supply water for irrigation. In recent years, growing criticism of the degraded condition of the Snowy River has prompted a number of investigations into the feasibility of providing increased flows in the river and of rehabilitation of the stream environment. A recent Snowy Water Inquiry recommended the partial restoration of streamflow in the Snowy River to 15% of natural levels. However, the Snowy Water Inquiry noted the considerable trade-offs involved in terms of hydro-electricity generation and irrigation, at an overall estimated cost of Australian dollars (A$) 194 million (approximately US$125 million). All monetary values are at 1998 levels (A$ converted to US$ at 0.63). The preferred option identified satisfied none of the interested parties and the matter remains unresolved. Given the complexity of the issue, the Snowy Water Inquiry must be seen as only an initial step in a lengthy process of balancing socioeconomic costs and benefits, and ecological, legal and political considerations, before rehabilitation of the Snowy River can be achieved. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<363::AID-RRR610>3.0.CO;2-I","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
澳大利亚雪河的修复选择:经济视角。
澳大利亚东南部的雪山计划提供了一个很好的例子,说明了水从溪流中转移时可能发生的广泛变化。该计划已有50年的历史,它将大量的水从雪河引到内陆来发电和灌溉用水。近年来,对雪河恶化状况的批评越来越多,促使人们对增加河流流量和恢复河流环境的可行性进行了一些调查。最近的雪水调查建议将雪河的部分流量恢复到自然水平的15%。然而,Snowy Water调查指出,在水力发电和灌溉方面涉及相当大的权衡,估计总成本为1.94亿澳元(约1.25亿美元)。所有货币价值都是1998年的水平(澳元兑换美元为0.63)。所确定的首选方案没有使任何有关方面满意,因此问题仍未得到解决。鉴于问题的复杂性,雪水调查必须被视为平衡社会经济成本和收益,以及生态,法律和政治因素的漫长过程中的第一步,然后才能实现雪水河的恢复。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。