A Performance Comparison of Different Topologies for Wireless Sensor Networks

A. Shrestha, L. Xing
{"title":"A Performance Comparison of Different Topologies for Wireless Sensor Networks","authors":"A. Shrestha, L. Xing","doi":"10.1109/THS.2007.370059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presently, star, mesh, tree, and clustered hierarchical architecture have emerged as the choice topologies for wireless sensor networks (WSN). Each topology has its own pros and cons under the specific working environment constraints. Consequently, current research depicts customized domain-specific ad hoc network topologies for efficient utilization of the constrained sensor resources. In this paper, we compare the various WSN topologies using performance criteria such as reliability, energy-efficiency, network life, scalability, self-organizing capability, data latency, etc. We focus on the reliability comparison of different topologies through a quantitative study. And we present a qualitative discussion on other performance criteria. Our study will provide useful insights for the WSN designers in choosing the appropriate topology and associated design parameters. We illustrate our observations via case studies.","PeriodicalId":428684,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2007.370059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Presently, star, mesh, tree, and clustered hierarchical architecture have emerged as the choice topologies for wireless sensor networks (WSN). Each topology has its own pros and cons under the specific working environment constraints. Consequently, current research depicts customized domain-specific ad hoc network topologies for efficient utilization of the constrained sensor resources. In this paper, we compare the various WSN topologies using performance criteria such as reliability, energy-efficiency, network life, scalability, self-organizing capability, data latency, etc. We focus on the reliability comparison of different topologies through a quantitative study. And we present a qualitative discussion on other performance criteria. Our study will provide useful insights for the WSN designers in choosing the appropriate topology and associated design parameters. We illustrate our observations via case studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无线传感器网络不同拓扑结构的性能比较
目前,星形、网状、树形和聚类等层次结构已成为无线传感器网络的首选拓扑结构。在特定的工作环境约束下,每种拓扑都有自己的优缺点。因此,目前的研究描述了定制的特定领域的自组织网络拓扑,以有效利用受限的传感器资源。在本文中,我们使用诸如可靠性、能效、网络寿命、可扩展性、自组织能力、数据延迟等性能标准来比较各种WSN拓扑。通过定量研究,重点比较了不同拓扑结构的可靠性。并对其他性能标准进行了定性讨论。我们的研究将为WSN设计者选择合适的拓扑和相关的设计参数提供有用的见解。我们通过案例研究来说明我们的观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Millimeter Waves: The Evolving Scene Automatic Visual Analysis for Transportation Security Intelligent Video for Homeland Security Applications An Evaluation of eLoran as a Backup to GPS Results of Location Service Measurements for CCDS Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1