Eliciting People's Conceptual Models of Activities and Systems

A. Blandford
{"title":"Eliciting People's Conceptual Models of Activities and Systems","authors":"A. Blandford","doi":"10.4018/IJCSSA.2013010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People using computer systems are required to work with the concepts implemented by system developers. If there is a poor fit between system concepts and users' pre-existing conceptualisation of domain and task, this places a high workload on the user as they translate between their own conceptualisation and that imposed by the system. The focus of this paper is on how to identify users' conceptualisations of a domain-ideally, prior to system implementation. For this, it is necessary to gather verbal data from people that allows them to articulate their conceptual models in ways that are not overly constrained by existing devices but allows them to articulate taken-for-granted knowledge. Possible study types include semi-structured interviews, contextual inquiry interviews and think-aloud protocols. The authors discuss how to design a study, covering choosing between different kinds of study, detailed planning of questions and tasks, data gathering, and preliminary data analysis.","PeriodicalId":277615,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCSSA.2013010101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

People using computer systems are required to work with the concepts implemented by system developers. If there is a poor fit between system concepts and users' pre-existing conceptualisation of domain and task, this places a high workload on the user as they translate between their own conceptualisation and that imposed by the system. The focus of this paper is on how to identify users' conceptualisations of a domain-ideally, prior to system implementation. For this, it is necessary to gather verbal data from people that allows them to articulate their conceptual models in ways that are not overly constrained by existing devices but allows them to articulate taken-for-granted knowledge. Possible study types include semi-structured interviews, contextual inquiry interviews and think-aloud protocols. The authors discuss how to design a study, covering choosing between different kinds of study, detailed planning of questions and tasks, data gathering, and preliminary data analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引出人们对活动和系统的概念模型
使用计算机系统的人需要与系统开发人员实现的概念一起工作。如果系统概念和用户预先存在的领域和任务概念化之间不太匹配,这将给用户带来很高的工作量,因为他们需要在自己的概念化和系统强加的概念化之间进行转换。本文的重点是如何在系统实现之前识别用户对领域的概念化。为此,有必要从人们那里收集口头数据,使他们能够以不受现有设备过度限制的方式表达他们的概念模型,但允许他们表达想当然的知识。可能的研究类型包括半结构化访谈、情境探究访谈和有声思考协议。作者讨论了如何设计一项研究,包括选择不同类型的研究,详细规划问题和任务,数据收集和初步数据分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Business Ontology to Integrate Business Architecture and Business Process Management for Healthcare Modeling Embedded System Verification Using Formal Model an Approach Based on the Combined Use of UML and Maude Language On Because and Why: Reasoning with Natural Language Specifying Constraints for Detecting Inconsistencies in A Conceptual Graph Knowledge Base Conceptual Graphs Based Approach for Subjective Answers Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1