Time Efficiency, Written Feedback, and Student Achievement in Inquiry-Oriented Biology Labs

John M. Basey, Anastasia P. Maines, C. D. Francis
{"title":"Time Efficiency, Written Feedback, and Student Achievement in Inquiry-Oriented Biology Labs","authors":"John M. Basey, Anastasia P. Maines, C. D. Francis","doi":"10.20429/IJSOTL.2014.080215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We examined how different styles of written feedback by graduate-student teaching assistants (GTAs) incollege intro biology lab (USA) influenced student achievement and related the different styles to timeefficiency. We quantified GTA feedback on formative lab reports and student achievement on two differenttypes of assessments, a quiz in 2010 and a summative lab report in 2011. We evaluated the extent to whichthree categories of written feedback impacted student achievement (grade discrepancy between actual andideal, short direct comments, and in-depth explanatory comments). Student achievement was best explainedby both grade discrepancy and short direct comments in 2010 and grade discrepancy only in 2011. In-depthexplanations were not part of the best-fit models in either year. Results also indicated that GTAs provided littleencouraging feedback, most feedback was targeted and asked students to expand on explanations. Results arediscussed in relation to relative time efficiency and GTA training.","PeriodicalId":332019,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20429/IJSOTL.2014.080215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract We examined how different styles of written feedback by graduate-student teaching assistants (GTAs) incollege intro biology lab (USA) influenced student achievement and related the different styles to timeefficiency. We quantified GTA feedback on formative lab reports and student achievement on two differenttypes of assessments, a quiz in 2010 and a summative lab report in 2011. We evaluated the extent to whichthree categories of written feedback impacted student achievement (grade discrepancy between actual andideal, short direct comments, and in-depth explanatory comments). Student achievement was best explainedby both grade discrepancy and short direct comments in 2010 and grade discrepancy only in 2011. In-depthexplanations were not part of the best-fit models in either year. Results also indicated that GTAs provided littleencouraging feedback, most feedback was targeted and asked students to expand on explanations. Results arediscussed in relation to relative time efficiency and GTA training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究性生物实验室的时间效率、书面反馈与学生成绩
摘要本研究考察了美国大学生物导论实验室研究生助教写作反馈的不同风格对学生成绩的影响,以及不同风格与时间效率的关系。我们量化了GTA对形成性实验报告的反馈和学生在两种不同类型的评估上的成就,2010年的测验和2011年的总结实验报告。我们评估了三类书面反馈对学生成绩的影响程度(实际和理想之间的分数差异,简短的直接评论和深入的解释性评论)。2010年,学生成绩最好的解释是成绩差异和简短的直接评论,2011年只有成绩差异。在这两年中,深度解释都不是最佳拟合模型的一部分。结果还表明,gta提供的令人鼓舞的反馈很少,大多数反馈是有针对性的,并要求学生扩展解释。结果讨论了相对时间效率和GTA训练的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact High Impact Learning for Facilitator Training and Development Using the Authentic Intellectual (AIW) Framework to Connect First Year Students with the Local Blues Society Service-Learning to Develop Responsiveness Among Preservice Teachers Growth of Pedagogical Practice in an Active Multidisciplinary FLC on Flipped Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1